The White House on Sunday called for Senate Republicans to change the chamber’s rules to resolve the funding impasse as the government shutdown continued into its second day.
White House budget director Mick Mulvaney said on CNN’s „State of the Union“ that eliminating the filibuster would be one avenue they back to ending the shutdown.
„There’s a bunch of different ways to fix this,“ Mulvaney said. „We just want it to get fixed.“
Senate rules impose a threshold of 60 votes to break a filibuster, and Senate Republicans currently hold a slim majority of 51 votes, meaning even if they can unite their members, they need nine more votes to end debate. The White House is calling for the Senate to change its rules and move the threshold to a simple majority of 51 votes.
Eliminating the 60-vote threshold to break a legislative filibuster would remove significant powers for the minority party in the Senate, and party leaders have been reluctant to do so in the past because of the consequences it would pose when their party returns to the minority.
Mulvaney offered that another way to end the shutdown, from their point of view, would be for enough Democrats to cross the aisle and give the GOP the votes it needs to restore funding.
„Get some of those Democrats who say back home they want to work in a bipartisan fashion, they want to work with Republicans, but don’t,“ Mulvaney said.
He noted that the White House has been „critical“ of the 60-vote threshold to overcome filibusters since Trump took office.
As routine use of the filibuster has increased over the years, debate has grown about its elimination. Last April, McConnell took the latest step to change the rule, triggering the nuclear option to break a filibuster on the confirmation of Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court.
Trump has called repeatedly for McConnell to move the Senate to simple-majority rule, and despite some backing from the House Republicans, the rules have remained. McConnell said in April that the „core of the Senate is the legislative filibuster“ and that he was opposed to going „nuclear.“
