Washington Cardinal Donald Wuerl after he became entangled in two major sexual abuse and cover-up scandals and lost the support of many in his flock.<\/b>
\nVATICAN CITY \u2014 Pope Francis accepted the resignation Friday of Washington Cardinal Donald Wuerl after he became entangled in two major sexual abuse and cover-up scandals and lost the support of many in his flock.
But in a letter released by Wuerl\u2019s office, Francis asked him to stay on temporarily and suggested Wuerl had unfairly become a scapegoat, having made some \u201cmistakes\u201d in handling sex abuse cases, but not having covered them up.
With the resignation, Wuerl becomes the most prominent head to roll in the scandal roiling the Catholic Church after his predecessor as Washington archbishop, Theodore McCarrick, was forced to resign as cardinal over allegations he sexually abused at least two minors and adult seminarians.
A grand jury report issued in August on rampant sex abuse in six Pennsylvania dioceses accused Wuerl of helping to protect some child-molesting priests while he was bishop of Pittsburgh from 1988 to 2006. Simultaneously, Wuerl faced widespread skepticism over his insistence that he knew nothing about years of alleged sexual misconduct by McCarrick.
A Vatican statement Friday said Francis had accepted Wuerl\u2019s resignation, but named no replacement; in his letter, the pope asked him to stay on in a temporary capacity until a new archbishop is found and implied he was accepting the resignation reluctantly.
Wuerl, who turns 78 in November, initially downplayed the scandal, insisted on his own good record, but then progressively came to the conclusion that he could no longer lead the archdiocese.
\u201cThe Holy Father\u2019s decision to provide new leadership to the archdiocese can allow all of the faithful, clergy, religious and lay, to focus on healing and the future,\u201d Wuerl said in a statement Friday. \u201cOnce again for any past errors in judgment I apologize and ask for pardon.\u201d
In his letter accepting the resignation, Francis said he recognized that, in asking to retire, Wuerl had put the interests and unity of his flock ahead of his own ambitions.
\u201cYou have sufficient elements to justify your actions and distinguish between what it means to cover up crimes or not to deal with problems, and to commit some mistakes,\u201d Francis wrote. \u201cHowever, your nobility has led you not to choose this way of defense. Of this I am proud and thank you.\u201d
Francis\u2019 praise alarmed survivors\u2019 advocates, who said it was evidence of the clerical culture Francis himself denounces in which the church hierarchy protects its own.
Terrence McKiernan, president of the online abuse database BishopAccountability, said it showed that for Francis, \u201cCardinal Wuerl is more important than the children he put in harm\u2019s way. Until Pope Francis reverses this emphasis on coddling the hierarchy at the expense of children, the Catholic Church will never emerge from this crisis.\u201d
Wuerl had submitted his resignation to Francis nearly three years ago, when he turned 75, the normal retirement age for bishops. But Francis kept him on, as popes tend to do with able-bodied bishops who share their pastoral priorities.
But Wuerl made a personal appeal to Francis last month to accept the resignation, following the fallout of the McCarrick scandal and outrage over the Pennsylvania grand jury report that has led to a crisis in confidence in the church hierarchy.
Wuerl was also named prominently in the 11-page denunciation of the McCarrick cover-up that was penned by the Vatican\u2019s former ambassador to the U. S., Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano, who accused a long line of U. S. and Vatican churchmen of turning a blind eye to McCarrick\u2019s penchant for sleeping with seminarians.
Wuerl has not been charged with any wrongdoing but was named numerous times in the Pennsylvania report, which details instances in which he allowed priests accused of misconduct to be reassigned or reinstated.
In one case cited in the report, Wuerl \u2014 acting on a doctor\u2019s recommendation \u2014 enabled priest William O\u2019Malley to return to active ministry in 1998 despite allegations of abuse lodged against him in the past and his own admission that he was sexually interested in adolescents. Years later, according to the report, six more people alleged that they were sexually assaulted by O\u2019Malley, in some cases after he had been reinstated.
In another case, Wuerl returned a priest to active ministry in 1995 despite having received multiple complaints that the priest, George Zirwas, had molested boys in the late 1980s.
Wuerl apologized for the damage inflicted on the victims but also defended his efforts to combat clergy sex abuse.
His defenders have cited a case that surfaced in 1988, when a 19-year-old former seminarian, Tim Bendig, filed a lawsuit accusing a priest, Anthony Cipolla, of molesting him. Wuerl initially questioned Bendig\u2019s account but later accepted it and moved to oust Cipolla from the priesthood. The Vatican\u2019s highest court ordered Wuerl to restore Cipolla to priestly ministry, but Wuerl resisted and, after two years of legal procedures, prevailed in preventing Cipolla\u2019s return.
\u201cNo bishop or cardinal in the nation has had a more consistent and courageous record than Donald Wuerl in addressing priestly sexual abuse,\u201d contended Bill Donohue, president of the Catholic League.
Wuerl\u2019s archdiocese issued a series of similar plaudits on Friday, coinciding with the Vatican announcement. They included a letter from the archdiocesan chancellor, Kim Vitti Fiorentino, who lamented that Wuerl\u2019s \u201cpioneering leadership in the enhancement, implementation and enforcement of historically innovative child protection policies was overshadowed by the (Pennsylvania grand jury) report\u2019s flaws and its interpretation by the media.\u201d
The Rev. Thomas Reese, a Jesuit priest who writes for Religion News Service, described Wuerl as an ideological moderate.
\u201cHe was totally enthusiastic about John Paul II, and then Pope Benedict, and now he\u2019s totally enthusiastic about Pope Francis,\u201d Reese said. \u201cThere are not many people in the church who are totally enthusiastic about all three of them.\u201d
Numerous conservative Catholic activists and commentators, though, considered him too tolerant of the LGBT community and too liberal on some other issues. They resented his pivotal role a decade ago in resisting a push by some of his fellow bishops to deny Communion to Catholic politicians who support the right to abortion.
Survivor advocate David Clohessy of the group SNAP said Wuerl\u2019s \u201clong-overdue\u201d resignation might give solace to victims. But he said it would likely do little to deter others in the hierarchy from covering up for abusers.
\u201cBut if archaic, predatory-friendly laws were reformed and if more prosecutors showed real courage, these complicit clerics might face criminal charges, and that might make a real difference,\u201d he said in a statement.
Wuerl was born in Pittsburgh, attended Catholic University in Washington and received a doctorate in theology from the University of Saint Thomas in Rome. He joined the priesthood in 1966, was ordained a bishop by Pope John Paul II in 1986, and served briefly as auxiliary bishop in Seattle before going to Pittsburgh.<\/p>\n

\n

Similarity rank: 29<\/div>\n

Sentiment rank: -1.9<\/div>\n

<\/div>\n

TW posts: 80<\/div>\n

TW reposts: 2<\/div>\n

TW likes: 2<\/div>\n

TW sentiment: -10<\/div>\n<\/div>\n