Jim Acosta’s behavior doesn’t just damage his own reputation, it hurts CNN’s and the entire journalistic profession.<\/b>
\nJim Acosta is a pundit who works for CNN. He was credentialed to attend White House press briefings, which he routinely used as opportunities to share his personal political views and animosity toward President Donald Trump.
The situation with Acosta, who is known as a shameless grandstander who seeks personal attention rather than a journalist who seeks to cover the news, came to a head last week when he repeatedly violated decorum at the White House by offering personal opinions in the place of actual questions, fighting with the president, interrupting the president, and belligerently refusing to return the White House microphone to a staff member.
The White House pulled his hard pass that gives him unfettered access to the White House press briefings. He and CNN sued President Trump, Chief of Staff John Kelly, Press Secretary Sarah Sanders, Deputy Chief of Staff for Communications Bill Shine, Secret Service Director Randolph Alles, and the Secret Service officer who took Acosta\u2019s hard pass away.
Yes, really.
Here\u2019s why every single party to this story is wrong.
Precisely no one actually thinks that Acosta is a good news journalist. He might be good entertainment, for some, but he doesn\u2019t break news or accurately report it. He\u2019s a pundit who loves to offer his opinions all day, every day.
Even among his colleagues he\u2019s known as a preener rather than a reporter. He doesn\u2019t break stories or dig into facts. He preens on camera and does it in a way that makes it harder for legitimate press corps members to hold the administration accountable.
Every second that Acosta uses to preen and whine at a press conference is a second that a real journalist can\u2019t use to ask questions or elicit information the American people need to know about. His behavior doesn\u2019t just damage his own reputation, it hurts CNN\u2019s and the entire journalism profession.
His behavior last week crossed a line when he physically refused a young female intern attempting to provide the White House microphone to another reporter. He then doubled down and falsely claimed without evidence that he didn\u2019t touch her. In fact, video evidence showing he did touch her is incontrovertible.
While Acosta is in his 40s, he clearly needs help with his professional development. Instead of being encouraged and promoted, he should be sat down and coached in proper techniques for gathering and broadcasting the news. He should also be taught basic etiquette.
As soon as CNN realized that they had a White House reporter who was intent on making himself the story rather than covering the actual news, they should have given the plum perch to a real reporter who had both the desire and the ability to perform the job and model good behavior for his or her colleagues.
When Acosta made a fool of himself last week, CNN should have encouraged him to apologize for his treatment of the staffer. Instead they poured gasoline on the fire by suing Trump, Sanders, Kelly, Shine, the head of the Secret Service, and the Secret Service employee who took his pass. They claim that Acosta has a First Amendment right to unfettered access to the White House.
After Acosta failed to behave appropriately, and CNN failed to behave appropriately, the leaders of the White House Correspondents Association should have stepped in.
The White House Correspondents\u2019 Association is perhaps best known outside of Washington, D. C., for its annual dinner in which left-wing celebrities of varying notoriety attack Republicans. This year\u2019s dinner featured a comedian viciously mocking Sanders\u2019 physical appearance. Its real purpose is to organize journalists who cover the White House. The organization, which was formed in 1914, handles credentialing, access to the White House and the president, and maintenance of the briefing rooms.
It\u2019s important that the press have access to the White House. Any restriction on that is worth sounding the alarm over. It\u2019s also important to be prudent and wise in how the press practices its craft so as to ensure their preservation.
Amy Wajda wrote a book about an unrelated threat to press freedoms titled \u201c The First Amendment Bubble: How Privacy and Paparazzi Threaten a Free Press.\u201d Even more than our strong laws protecting press freedoms is our strong culture protecting the same. She argues that aggressive paparazzi encroaching on people\u2019s privacy endangers that culture that protects the enforcement of press freedoms.
A similar warning is in play here. To protect this culture of unfettered access to the White House, agreeing not to accost young female interns is prudent and proper.
When a press organization fails to handle its own employee\u2019s improper behavior, the White House Correspondents Association shouldn\u2019t make excuses for the media outlet but be the wiser and calmer head that prevails. Instead, it reportedly did the opposite:
Particularly if the WHCA wants to argue against the revocation of Acosta\u2019s privileges, it can\u2019t ignore what all with eyes can see: Acosta\u2019s behavior at the press conference and treatment of the young female staffer was over the line. Pretending it wasn\u2019t doesn\u2019t give confidence in the WHCA\u2019s position of authority to navigate the affairs it oversees.
It is not the job of the White House or President Trump to tell CNN how they are to manage their employees or affairs. Further, the White House has no business dictating how it\u2019s covered and who covers it.
The White House can, of course, draw the line when members of the press begin accosting White House staff in inappropriate ways. The White House has tolerated Acosta\u2019s behavior for years, no matter how ridiculous. The behavior only crossed the line when he belligerently refused to hand over the government\u2019s microphone he\u2019d been lent.
While CNN has departed from traditional news gathering into an \u201c Orange Man Bad \u201d cartoon version of a news operation, the White House should still allow CNN access, even if it feels the need to limit Acosta because of the threat he poses staff members.
Just from a strategic communications standpoint, however, Acosta was the White House\u2019s best asset as it attempts to convince the country that the media are not doing their jobs well. One could reasonably argue that one Jim Acosta grandstanding moment in front of cameras is worth a thousand \u201cfake news\u201d tweets by the president for making that case. Why turn him into a martyr or otherwise remove him from his special perch that shows the world that CNN and other major media are unable to report the news?<\/p>\n

\n

Similarity rank: 31<\/div>\n

Sentiment rank: -0.4<\/div>\n

<\/div>\n

TW posts: 23<\/div>\n

TW reposts: 214<\/div>\n

TW likes: 500<\/div>\n

TW sentiment: 3.3<\/div>\n<\/div>\n