The film shows glimmers of the artistry of „Moonlight,“ but it also has difficulty translating Baldwin’s novel to the big screen<\/b>
\nFaith in a very pure romantic attraction between two people was the dramatic core of Barry Jenkins\u2019s Oscar-winning \u201cMoonlight,\u201d and that same faith is the animating principle of his much-anticipated follow-up \u201cIf Beale Street Could Talk,\u201d a rich but very unwieldy adaptation of James Baldwin\u2019s 1974 novel.
\u201cMoonlight\u201d originated in a story from the gifted playwright Tarell Alvin McCraney, and Jenkins was able to make the narrative of that sensitive film his own by applying a poetic kind of stealth to the subjective visuals. But the Baldwin of \u201cIf Beale Street Could Talk\u201d makes for a much more demanding and intimidating authorial basis for a movie.
Tish Rivers (KiKi Layne) and Fonny Hunt (Stephan James, \u201cRace\u201d) have known each other since they were children. Jenkins\u2019s film, like Baldwin\u2019s novel, is told from Tish\u2019s point of view and moves backward and forward in time in a way that suggests puzzle pieces scattered out on a table.
Also Read: ‚If Beale Street Could Talk‘ Director Barry Jenkins on Why Showing Vulnerability Is ‚a Sign of Strength‘
Tish is 19 years old and Fonny 22 when they first begin to love each other in a romantic, adult, and sexual fashion, and Jenkins begins his movie with a shot of them walking together. They stare into each other\u2019s eyes and seem to get lost there, but that process is abruptly halted when we learn that Fonny has been put in jail for a crime he did not commit. \u201cI hope that nobody has ever had to look at anybody they love through glass,\u201d Tish says on the soundtrack. We see her meeting with Fonny in prison and telling him that she is pregnant with his child.
There is a formality to the language here and to the heightened, rather torturously plotted dramatic situations, and so Jenkins wisely tries to put everything across visually as simply as possible. This is not a director\u2019s performance type of movie as \u201cMoonlight\u201d was but more like a test of skill and imagination. What needs to really be stressed in any assessment of \u201cIf Beale Street Could Talk\u201d is just how difficult Baldwin\u2019s source material is to translate into a film.
Also Read: Regina King SAG Awards Snub Sparks Cries of ‚Category Fraud‘ and ‚Dopey Goons‘
Toward the beginning of this movie, there is an outsized, Shakespearean confrontation scene between Tish and her parents and Fonny\u2019s family, which is dominated by his very religious mother Mrs. Hunt (Aunjanue Ellis). Tish tells us on the soundtrack that Mrs. Hunt both disapproves of her as a mate for her son and also sometimes thinks that Fonny deserves her as a kind of punishment. This sort of deep-dish psychological observation sounds very literary, and when we hear it as narration and then see how Mrs. Hunt behaves, the effect feels somehow unbalanced, or top-heavy.
There is a sense sometimes in \u201cIf Beale Street Could Talk\u201d that Tish\u2019s narration competes with the imagery rather than deepening it. There are worse problems a film can have than overly brilliant writing, of course, but it is Baldwin\u2019s lyric talent that puts over the tangled plot he chose, and Jenkins might have had an easier time if he had simplified this plot somewhat and cut down on the novelistic sprawl.
Fonny has been falsely accused of rape by Victoria Rogers (Emily Rios), a Latinx woman who has fled to Puerto Rico after picking Fonny out in a line-up. It is made clear that Fonny has been railroaded by a white cop who has it in for him, and it is also made clear that Victoria has been raped, just not by Fonny. But a narrative that revolves around a false rape charge has unfortunate resonances in this particular American moment.
Also Read: Regina King to Receive Chairman’s Award From Palm Springs International Film Festival
\u201cIf Beale Street Could Talk\u201d contains some indelible moments, none more so than a brief scene involving Tish\u2019s mother Sharon (Regina King), who goes down to Puerto Rico to try to convince Victoria to save Fonny. When she gets to her hotel room, Sharon tries on a wig that she brought for the occasion, and then she slowly takes it off. Sharon is tired of the falseness of this wig, and King gets across how deep this tiredness goes.
And so it feels tragic when the next scene shows Sharon wearing the wig, which has the unintended consequence of making her look too slickly armored and insincere to the man she has come to see about Victoria. (In Baldwin\u2019s novel, Sharon covers her head with a shawl, and Jenkins\u2019s use of a wig instead really adds something emotional and profound to the drama.)
In this sequence in Puerto Rico, and in other scenes of attempted connection and disconnection between people, Jenkins shows some of the talent he displayed in \u201cMoonlight.\u201d This is a film worth grappling with, even if Baldwin\u2019s own talent has a diva-like way of pulling the focus back to his book and away from what we are seeing on the screen.<\/p>\n