<!--DEBUG:--><!--DEBUG:dc3-united-states-it-in-english-pdf-2--><!--DEBUG:--><!--DEBUG:dc3-united-states-it-in-english-pdf-2--><!--DEBUG-spv-->{"id":1998417,"date":"2021-09-27T16:33:00","date_gmt":"2021-09-27T14:33:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/nhub.news\/?p=1998417"},"modified":"2021-09-27T23:08:22","modified_gmt":"2021-09-27T21:08:22","slug":"instagram-kids-put-on-ice-after-backlash-from-lawmakers","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/nhub.news\/de\/2021\/09\/instagram-kids-put-on-ice-after-backlash-from-lawmakers\/","title":{"rendered":"Instagram Kids put on ice after backlash from lawmakers"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><b>Plans to build an Instagram Kids have been put on pause amid growing concerns about the dangers that the app could pose for children.<\/b><br \/>\nThe latest tech news Your sardonic source for consumer tech stories Human-centric AI news and analysis Driving the future of sustainable mobility No-nonsense stories about startup growth Inside money, markets, and Big Tech The hottest new jobs in tech Help build the bank of the future Coding for Public Service Small country, big ideas Instagram is pausing plans to build a kids\u2019 version of the app after a fierce backlash from lawmakers, child safety groups, and parents. Adam Mosseri, the head of Instagram, announced the move in a blog post published Monday: The mooted platform would have allowed children aged 10-12 to access a modified version of Instagram. At present, people under the age of 13 are barred from the app, but younger users can lie about their date of birth when they sign up for an account. Instagram said that a site designed for children would make younger users safer, but the proposals were widely slated. After the plan was discovered in March, attorneys general from across the US wrote a letter to Mark Zuckerberg, the CEO of Instagram-owner Facebook, urging the company to abandon the project: Child safety groups have also warned that an Instagram for kids \u201cwould put young users at great risk.\u201d These concerns have escalated since a recent investigation by The Wall Street Journal claimed that Facebook is aware that Instagram is \u201ctoxic\u201d for teen girls. Instagram has attempted to allay their fears by emphasizing that the project would differ significantly from the existing app. \u201cIt will require parental permission to join, it won\u2019t have ads, and it will have age-appropriate content and features,\u201d said Mosseri. \u201cParents can supervise the time their children spend on the app and oversee who can message them, who can follow them, and who they can follow. The list goes on.\u201d Mosseri denied that pausing the plans was an acknowledgment that the service is a bad idea. But he admitted that the company needed to take more time on the project. It could be a long time before the critics are convinced. Some argue that children who have existing Instagram accounts are unlikely to migrate to a \u201cbabyish\u201d version of the platform. Instead, they\u2019ll continue lying about their age and using the real thing current site. The group of attorneys generals said an Instagram Kids would appeal primarily to kids who otherwise wouldn\u2019t have an account for the app. They suspect that Facebook\u2019s plans aren\u2019t responding to a need, but creating one.<\/p>\n<script>jQuery(function(){jQuery(\".vc_icon_element-icon\").css(\"top\", \"0px\");});<\/script><script>jQuery(function(){jQuery(\"#td_post_ranks\").css(\"height\", \"10px\");});<\/script><script>jQuery(function(){jQuery(\".td-post-content\").find(\"p\").find(\"img\").hide();});<\/script>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Plans to build an Instagram Kids have been put on pause amid growing concerns about the dangers that the app could pose for children. The latest tech news Your sardonic source for consumer tech stories Human-centric AI news and analysis Driving the future of sustainable mobility No-nonsense stories about startup growth Inside money, markets, and [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":1998416,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[90],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/nhub.news\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1998417"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/nhub.news\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/nhub.news\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/nhub.news\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/nhub.news\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1998417"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/nhub.news\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1998417\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1998418,"href":"http:\/\/nhub.news\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1998417\/revisions\/1998418"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/nhub.news\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1998416"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/nhub.news\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1998417"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/nhub.news\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1998417"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/nhub.news\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1998417"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}