Despite suing OpenAI for intellectual property theft, Vivek Shah remains ‚bullish‘ on the impact of AI on life and business.<\/b>
\nVivek Shah, CEO of Ziff Davis.
The CEO who is currently best known for standing up to OpenAI by suing it for allowing ChatGPT to make unauthorized copies of his company’s content, has turned his attention to warning consumers against using AI chatbots for buying advice when making big purchases.
Listen to Vivek Shah’s full interview on the Channels podcast.
„In the end, sources matter“, said Shah. „Where we get information matters. And so if you start to look into citations in LLM chatbots, you’re going to see that sources have gone from journalism sources to marketing sources.“
Beyond just ChatGPT, Shah is talking about going to apps like Google Gemini, Perplexity, and Anthropic’s Claude to get information when you’re researching an important purchase. While all of these platforms cite the places where they got the information in their natural language responses, in some cases they make their sources less prominent and not as easy to click through and verify.
But Shah recommended that consumers go on that journey to make sure they understand which sources are shaping the information they are being fed by the chatbots in such a quick and digestible format.
„I am amazed at how many citations are not [from] publishers but [from] brands“, he said. „For most [brands] being sourced in an AI answer is a good thing because it favors their product. But that may not be what’s in the best interest of the user. And so I would just encourage people to look at what’s actually informing the answer, and then ask yourself, ‚Would I have relied on those sources [before AI chatbots]?“
In a quick comparison of four of the most popular chatbots by asking them the question „are the Meta Ray-Ban Display glasses a good purchase“, I discovered mixed results. Claude and Gemini showed more vendor sources while Perplexity and ChatGPT leaned more on publisher sources. Perplexity displayed its sources the most prominently and made it the easiest to click through. But keep in mind that each person will get different results when using LLMs, and could even get different results when asking the same question multiple times.
He told Kafka, „I’m actually very bullish about AI in terms of what it can do in the context of our business and we’re seeing some really smart implementations right now.“ Shah also admitted that a part of his company’s future could be licensing its trustworthy data to feed the AI chatbots of tomorrow.
„My issue is an intellectual property issue, but it’s not one where I say AI is not going to be transformative for our lives and for our businesses“, Shah said. „I think it is going to be.“<\/p>\n