In a new paper, an international team of researchers revisited the idea of blowing up an incoming asteroid with a nuclear warhead.<\/b>
\nPlenty of asteroids can survive their fiery plunge through the Earth\u2019s atmosphere. If they\u2019re big enough, they can prove incredibly destructive, like the 60-foot Chelyabinsk meteor that exploded over the southern Ural region in Russia in 2013, releasing a blast equivalent to 30 times the energy of the atomic bomb that was dropped on Hiroshima.
And in case an even larger space rock were to ever threaten humanity, we\u2019d have to get creative to keep it from colliding with our planet. Crashing a spacecraft into it like a pool ball to redirect its path \u2014 just like NASA did with its proof of concept Double Asteroid Redirection Test (DART) mission in 2022 \u2014 may not always be on the table, given the many uncertainties involved.
In a new paper published in the journal Nature Communications, an international team of researchers \u2014 including scientists from CERN and the University of Oxford \u2014 revisited the idea of blowing up an incoming asteroid with a nuclear warhead.
There are intuitive concerns. What if the asteroid shattered, turning a cosmic sniper shot into a shotgun blast of debris raining down over our planet?
But the team used CERN\u2019s Super Proton Synchrotron (SPS) to study how asteroid materials react to different levels of physical stress, including large-scale simulations of nuclear deflection, and found that the space rocks are surprisingly resilient.
\u201cPlanetary defense represents a scientific challenge,\u201d said Karl-Georg Schlesinger, cofounder of nuclear deflection startup Outer Solar System Company (OuSoCo), which partnered with the scientists, in a statement. \u201cThe world must be able to execute a nuclear deflection mission with high confidence, yet cannot conduct a real-world test in advance.\u201d
In an experiment, the team exposed samples of a metal-rich meteorite to 27 short but intense pulses of a proton beam at CERN\u2019s HiRadMat facility. Afterward, the team moved the meteorite to the ISIS Neutron and Muon Source at the Rutherford Appleton Laboratory in the UK to analyze changes to its internal structure at a microscopic level.
To their surprise, the \u201cmaterial became stronger, exhibiting an increase in yield strength, and displayed a self-stabilizing damping behavior,\u201d explained OuSoCo cofounder Melanie Bochmann.
The finding could have major implications for how we approach future asteroid redirection efforts.
\u201cOur experiments indicate that \u2014 at least for metal-rich asteroid material \u2014 a larger device than previously thought can be used without catastrophically breaking the asteroid,\u201d Bochmann said. \u201cThis keeps open an emergency option for situations involving very large objects or very short warning times, where non-nuclear methods are insufficient and where current models might assume fragmentation would limit the usable device size.\u201d
Fortunately, the researchers could soon have far more data to go by. Both NASA and the European Space Agency are planning to study Apophis, an enormous asteroid somewhere between 1,000 and 1,500 feet in width, which is expected to come eerily close to the Earth \u2014 closer than many geosynchronous satellites at just 20,000 miles \u2014 to Earth in April 2029.
\u201cAs a next step, we plan to study more complex and rocky asteroid materials,\u201d the researchers said in a statement. \u201cOne example is a class of meteorites called pallasites, which consist of a metal matrix similar to the meteorite material we have already studied, with up to centimeter-sized magnesium-rich crystals embedded inside.\u201d
The upcoming research could have fascinating implications outside of asteroid redirection as well.
\u201cBecause these objects are thought to originate from the core\u2013mantle boundary of early planetesimals,\u201d they added, \u201csuch experiments could also provide valuable insights into planetary formation processes.\u201d<\/p>\n