<!--DEBUG:--><!--DEBUG:dc5-grasp-china-in-english-pdf--><!--DEBUG:--><!--DEBUG:dc5-grasp-china-in-english-pdf--><!--DEBUG-spv-->{"id":663355,"date":"2017-08-24T19:41:00","date_gmt":"2017-08-24T17:41:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/nhub.news\/?p=663355"},"modified":"2017-08-25T02:22:35","modified_gmt":"2017-08-25T00:22:35","slug":"cambridge-university-press-censorship-attacks-are-misguided","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/nhub.news\/de\/2017\/08\/cambridge-university-press-censorship-attacks-are-misguided\/","title":{"rendered":"Cambridge University Press censorship attacks are misguided"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><b>Letters: The censorship is by the customer \u2013 the Chinese government \u2013 not Cambridge University Press<\/b><br \/>\nI refer to Paul Mason\u2019s important, but mistaken argument about Cambridge University Press\u2019s agreement with the Chinese authorities to delete 300 articles from China Quarterly (Cambridge University Press had to reverse its self-censorship in China: the west can\u2019 t afford to collude with Xi\u2019s assault on truth, G2,22 August) . All societies have their own particular sensibilities; many have positions of sacredness. All societies limit free speech in varying detail. Paul Mason knows this. Western societies are currently limiting criticism of the state of Israel and your editorial of 22 August, discusses limiting free speech regarding hate crime online \u2013 rightly so, in my view. These are our sensibilities right now.<br \/>I would love Paul Mason to discuss and explain China\u2019s political sensitivities so we could understand them better. As a founder of Zed press who has worked with authors who have lost their jobs because of the books we have published, I have some experience in this field. I\u00a0don\u2019 t believe that bullying or lecturing other societies with different histories leads anywhere.<br \/>Roger van Zwanenberg<br \/>London<br \/>\u2022 The current outcry against Cambridge University Press is misguided. The publishers removed content unwanted by the customer. The censorship is by the customer \u2013 the Chinese government \u2013 not Cambridge. If the Chinese government had asked CUP not to publish a particular work in order to maintain access to their market that would be unacceptable, but that is not what happened here. Cambridge maintains its publishing independence. Meantime, the works remain available and in due course, as government policies inevitably change over time, they will no doubt come back into circulation even in China.<br \/>Jessica Lagan<br \/>Publisher, Cambridge Archive Edition<br \/>\u2022 Join the debate \u2013 email guardian.letters@theguardian.com <br \/>\u2022 Read more Guardian letters \u2013 click here to visit gu.com\/letters<\/p>\n<div id=\"td_post_ranks_tmp\" class=\"td-post-comments\" style=\"vertical-align: middle;display:none;\">\n<div style=\"float: left;\">Similarity rank: 4<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p><script>\n\/*jQuery(function() {\nvar mainContentMetaInfo = '.td-post-header .meta-info';\nvar tdPostRanks = '#td_post_ranks';\nif (jQuery(tdPostRanks).length) {\n    var tdPostRanksHtml = jQuery(tdPostRanks).get(0).outerHTML;\n    if (typeof tdPostRanksHtml != 'undefined') {\n        jQuery(tdPostRanks).remove();\n        jQuery(mainContentMetaInfo).append(tdPostRanksHtml);\n    }\n}\n});*\/\n<\/script><span>\u00a9 Source: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/world\/2017\/aug\/24\/cambridge-university-press-censorship-attacks-are-misguided\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/world\/2017\/aug\/24\/cambridge-university-press-censorship-attacks-are-misguided<\/a><br \/>\nAll rights are reserved and belongs to a source media.<\/span><\/p>\n<script>jQuery(function(){jQuery(\"#td_post_ranks\").remove();});<\/script><script>jQuery(function(){jQuery(\".td-post-content\").find(\"p\").find(\"img\").hide();});<\/script>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Letters: The censorship is by the customer \u2013 the Chinese government \u2013 not Cambridge University Press I refer to Paul Mason\u2019s important, but mistaken argument about Cambridge University Press\u2019s agreement with the Chinese authorities to delete 300 articles from China Quarterly (Cambridge University Press had to reverse its self-censorship in China: the west can\u2019 t [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":663354,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[115],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/nhub.news\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/663355"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/nhub.news\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/nhub.news\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/nhub.news\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/nhub.news\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=663355"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/nhub.news\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/663355\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":663356,"href":"http:\/\/nhub.news\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/663355\/revisions\/663356"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/nhub.news\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/663354"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/nhub.news\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=663355"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/nhub.news\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=663355"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/nhub.news\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=663355"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}