Do you remember a time when life did not consist entirely of having your brain bludgeoned to mush with copies of The Art of the Deal? Nope? Didn\u2019t think so. Anyhow, our rapidly decaying consensus reality took another neuron-devastating blow this week with news that scientists at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention must now grapple with a list of banned words.<\/b>
\nDo you remember a time when life did not consist entirely of having your brain bludgeoned to mush with copies of The Art of the Deal? Nope? Didn\u2019t think so. Anyhow, our rapidly decaying consensus reality took another neuron-devastating blow this week with news that scientists at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention must now grapple with a list of banned words.
Per the Washington Post, staff at the CDC working on the agency\u2019s budget are now prohibited from using a laundry list of seven terms elderly bigots might grumble about: \u201cvulnerable,\u201d \u201centitlement,\u201d \u201cdiversity,\u201d \u201ctransgender,\u201d \u201cfetus,\u201d \u201cevidence-based\u201d and \u201cscience-based.\u201d Obviously, avoiding using these words is going to directly impact the agency\u2019s work:
According to the Post, CDC officials in charge of the agency\u2019s finances did not relay why the words were now prohibited, but they did provide some alternative phrasing that would pass muster. For example, instead of \u201cevidence-based\u201d or \u201cscience-based,\u201d staff could use the \u201csuggested\u201d wording that the \u201cCDC bases its recommendations on science in consideration with community standards and wishes.\u201d
In other words, the agency charged with protecting Americans from epidemics and safeguarding the health of the public must now formally avoid saying anything even slightly politically inconvenient to Republicans if it wants funding. As the Post noted, the list of banned words is likely in use at other agencies managed by the Health and Human Services administration, though according to Stat News, the Food and Drug Administration has denied it is in effect there.
HHS spokesman Matt Lloyd told the Post that the department \u201cwill continue to use the best scientific evidence available to improve the health of all Americans. HHS also strongly encourages the use of outcome and evidence data in program evaluations and budget decisions.\u201d
But as Harvard Global Health Institute director Dr. Ashish Jha told Stat News, the decision to censor the seven words will likely force staff to self-censor their work.
\u201c… Of course the administration and its defenders are going to argue that this is only about what goes into the budget,\u201d Jha said. \u201cBut we know that the signal to the agency is much stronger than that. And it\u2019s going to change behavior of people who work there. And that\u2019s much more damaging than any direct censorship.\u201d
Anyone paying attention to the current administration\u2019s stance on science will recall similar instances in which federal researchers worried it was going to kill off reports on climate change, or it put climate change deniers and chemical lobbyists in charge at the Environmental Protection Agency, or it tried to make the FDA\u2019s chief scientist a guy whose previous experience mostly included blogging about \u201crace traitors.\u201d So, yeah, no word on whether the White House has requested the CDC get back into phrenology, but don\u2019t worry. There\u2019s plenty of fresh hell waiting for us in 2018.
[ Washington Post]<\/p>\n

\n

Sentiment rank: -0.4<\/div>\n

<\/div>\n<\/div>\n