‘Trump laid unspecified blame on China, North Korea’s leading trade partner, which is widely believed to hold the greatest sway over Kim’s government.’<\/b>
\nPresident Donald Trump said Friday he has directed Secretary of State Mike Pompeo to delay a planned trip to North Korea, citing insufficient progress on denuclearization.
Trump put some blame on Beijing, saying he does not believe China is helping \u201cbecause of our much tougher Trading stance.\u201d
The surprise announcement appeared to mark a concession by the president to domestic and international concerns that his prior claims of world-altering progress on the peninsula had been strikingly premature.
\u201cI have asked Secretary of State Mike Pompeo not to go to North Korea, at this time, because I feel we are not making sufficient progress with respect to the denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula,\u201d Trump tweeted Friday, barely two months after his June meeting with the North\u2019s Kim Jong Un in Singapore.
Trump\u2019s comment followed a report issued Monday by the International Atomic Energy Agency outlining \u201cgrave concern\u201d about the North\u2019s nuclear program. It came a day after Pompeo appointed Stephen Biegun, a senior executive with the Ford Motor Co., to be his special envoy for North Korea and said he and Biegun would visit next week.
TRENDING: Harvard Law Professor Dershowitz Tempers Hysteria on Cohen Plea: \u2018Kind of Like Jaywalking\u2019
The State Department never confirmed details of the trip, but it had been expected that Pompeo would be in Pyongyang for at least several hours Monday, according to several diplomatic sources familiar with the plan.
White House officials did not immediately comment on what prompted Trump to call off Pompeo\u2019s trip. The State Department had no immediate comment on the matter and referred questions to the White House.
Trump laid unspecified blame on China, North Korea\u2019s leading trade partner, which is widely believed to hold the greatest sway over Kim\u2019s government.
The U. S. and China have been locked in a trade dispute for months, with each side ratcheting up tariffs on imports from the other country in what may be the opening salvos of a trade war.
Trump tweeted that \u201cPompeo looks forward to going to North Korea in the near future, most likely after our Trading relationship with China is resolved.\u201d He added: \u201cIn the meantime I would like to send my warmest regards and respect to Chairman Kim. I look forward to seeing him soon!\u201d
After more a year of escalating tensions defined by nuclear and missile tests, new sanctions and \u201cfire and fury\u201d rhetoric, Trump made history meeting Kim earlier this year. In the run-up to the summit both nations engaged in hard-nosed negotiation, with Trump publically calling off the meeting in an effort to push Kim to agree to nuclear concessions. During the summit, the pair signed a vague joint statement in which the North agreed to denuclearize, but which left nearly all details undefined.
\u201cThere is no longer a Nuclear Threat from North Korea,\u201d Trump declared on Twitter after the meeting.
\u201cBefore taking office people were assuming that we were going to War with North Korea. President Obama said that North Korea was our biggest and most dangerous problem,\u201d he added. \u201cNo longer \u2013 sleep well tonight!\u201d
Pompeo would have been hard pressed to return from Pyongyang with anything resembling progress on the denuclearization front.
RELATED: North Korea Claims United States Is Pushing Too Hard for Denuclearization
Although it has halted nuclear and missile testing and taken some unrelated steps \u2014 dismantling portions of a missile engine facility and returning the suspected remains of American servicemen killed during the Korean War \u2014 its nuclear weapons program and ballistic missile development remain intact, according the U. N.\u2019s atomic watchdog and intelligence agencies.
In addition, recent statements from North Korean officials have ruled out any new concessions until it sees a reciprocal gesture from the U. S. beyond suspending military exercises with South Korea. North Korea has been demanding that the U. S. ease or lift crippling sanctions \u2014 something Pompeo and national security adviser John Bolton have flatly ruled out until the its nuclear program is fully and verifiably dismantled.
Other than sanctions relief, the North, backed by South Korea, has been seeking a declaration of the end of the Korean War. The conflict stopped with the signing of an armistice rather than a peace treaty, meaning the war is not technically over. Both the North and South have vowed to end the open state of hostilities, and Seoul had been hoping to persuade the Trump administration to sign off on a non-binding end-of-war declaration as a goodwill gesture that would give Kim Jong Un domestic cover to proceed with denuclearization moves.
Pompeo and other administration officials have suggested some concessions short of easing or lifting sanctions are possible before verified denuclearization, but have refused to be specific about what they could be. And they have been skeptical about an end-of-war declaration in the absence of any progress on the nuclear matter.
At the same time, lawmakers from both parties, including GOP hawks who generally support Trump, have expressed concerns about such a move, as it could be used by the North to demand the removal of U. S. troops from South Korea and potentially Japan without anything in return.
Trump had kept up the positive tone as recently as Tuesday at a campaign rally in West Virginia. There Trump maintained \u201cwe\u2019re doing well with North Korea.\u201d
\u201cThere\u2019s been no missile launches. There\u2019s been no rocket launches,\u201d he added.
At the same rally, Trump seemed to take a different tone too on China, saying he had withheld some criticism of China because \u201cI wanted them to help us with North Korea and they have.\u201d
The Associated Press contributed to this report.
We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.<\/p>\n