Campaign to rid programming of hurtful words finds a sequel in noSQL database project<\/b>
\nThe open-source Redis database, like the Python programming language, is moving away from using the technical terms \u00ab\u00a0master\u00a0\u00bb and \u00ab\u00a0slave\u00a0\u00bb in its documentation and API \u2013 to the extent that’s possible without breaking things.
For Python, the decision this week to replace the words \u00ab\u00a0master\u00a0\u00bb and \u00ab\u00a0slave\u00a0\u00bb, prompted by undisclosed complaints that they’re offensive, led to a backlash.
Meanwhile, those overseeing Python’s CPython repo on Github today locked a pull request purging the words, and deleted several comments. But not before one developer highlighted the irony of executing the word change using the Git version-control software, which still relies heavily on \u00ab\u00a0master\u00a0\u00bb \u2013 for example, merging commits in the master branch. (Barely any instances of \u00ab\u00a0slave\u00a0\u00bb appear in Git code, though.)
The Register asked Python developer Victor Stinner, author of the pull requests and Python bug report at the heart of the issue, whether he would like to discuss the controversy, but he declined. In previous comments, he justified his proposals to strip \u00ab\u00a0master\u00a0\u00bb and \u00ab\u00a0slave\u00a0\u00bb from the widely used programming language by saying some people object to the terms.
Around the same time, the master-slave conundrum resurfaced for Redis, an open-source in-memory database. Last week, Salvatore Sanfilippo, creator of Redis and known online as Antirez, published a blog post recounting how he’d received criticism from a developer for releasing Redis 5.0 RC5 without eliminating instances of \u00ab\u00a0master\u00a0\u00bb and \u00ab\u00a0slave\u00a0\u00bb \u2013 an issue Redis has been dealing with for a while .
Sanfilippo said he wasn’t interested in changing the terms in Redis, and in return was called \u00ab\u00a0a fascist,\u00a0\u00bb a term perhaps as offensive to him as \u00ab\u00a0master\u00a0\u00bb and \u00ab\u00a0slave\u00a0\u00bb might be to someone else given his claim that his family was persecuted by Italian fascists during World War II.
\u00ab\u00a0The first problem is that every terminology is offensive in principle, and I don\u2019t want to accept this idea that certain words that are problematic, especially for Americans to make peace with their past, should be banned,\u00a0\u00bb he wrote.
He objected to being bullied by the developer who raised the issue, an individual he referred to by the pseudonym \u00ab\u00a0Mark,\u00a0\u00bb and said, \u00ab\u00a0I believe that this environment is making it impossible to have important conversations.\u00a0\u00bb
But after discussions with others, and running a Twitter poll that found 53 per cent of his followers out of the 6,242 participating in the poll wanted to replace \u00ab\u00a0master\u00a0\u00bb and \u00ab\u00a0slave\u00a0\u00bb with gentler terms, he relented, saying he could not ignore the responses.
In a GitHub post shortly thereafter, he explained that he wanted to take action to prevent his views from affecting the willingness of others to use Redis.
On Thursday, he wrote via Twitter that the work to remove \u00ab\u00a0slave\u00a0\u00bb from Redis documentation was mostly complete, allowing that there were some places the word could not be removed because it was part of the API.
Other open-source communities, such as Drupal and Django, have taken similar action. The Kubernetes project last year affirmed its intention to move away from the terms. (And as happened with the Python community, the discussion had to be shut down after it became too heated.) In the open-source Helm project, \u00ab\u00a0master\u00a0\u00bb by itself has been deemed offensive somehow. Thus \u00ab\u00a0master chart\u00a0\u00bb has become \u00a0\u00bb umbrella chart\u00a0\u00bb in one instance.
In a Twitter direct message to The Register, Sanfilippo explained: \u00ab\u00a0In the limits of what was possible, I finished today to remove the term both from the Redis itself (adding command aliases and removing the logging of the word ‘slave’) and all the documentation, unless it was needed in certain parts to describe APIs outputting ‘slave.'\u00a0\u00bb
Contrarians committed to the controversial terms still have Oracle’s MySQL . \u00ae
Sponsored: Following Bottomline\u2019s journey to the Hybrid Cloud<\/p>\n

\n

Sentiment rank: -0.6<\/div>\n

<\/div>\n<\/div>\n