Senate Judiciary Committee Chuck Grassley referred one of Justice Brett Kavanaugh\u2019s accusers and her attorney for criminal investigation into whether the pair conspired to lie to Congress and obstruct an investigation. Julie Swetnick, through her attorney Michael Avenatti, accused Kavanaugh of misconduct that allegedly took place in the 1980s. Avenatti publicized the accusation while Grassley\u2019s\u2026<\/b>
\nSenate Judiciary Committee Chuck Grassley referred one of Justice Brett Kavanaugh\u2019s accusers and her attorney for criminal investigation into whether the pair conspired to lie to Congress and obstruct an investigation.
Julie Swetnick, through her attorney Michael Avenatti, accused Kavanaugh of misconduct that allegedly took place in the 1980s. Avenatti publicized the accusation while Grassley\u2019s committee was investigating an accusation by another accuser, Christine Blasey Ford, as part of the hearings to confirm Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court.
Swetnick\u2019s allegation, detailed in a sworn statement to the committee, included \u201cobvious\u201d contradictions and was released at a suspicious time, necessitating an investigation by the FBI, according to Grassley.
\u201cWhen a well-meaning citizen comes forward with information relevant to the committee\u2019s work, I take it seriously,\u201d Grassley said in a statement . \u201cBut in the heat of partisan moments, some do try to knowingly mislead the committee. That\u2019s unfair to my colleagues, the nominees and others providing information who are seeking the truth. It stifles our ability to work on legitimate lines of inquiry. It also wastes time and resources for destructive reasons.\u201d
Grassley noted that his referral is not an allegation of a crime.
The senator\u2019s referral is detailed in a methodic 29-page letter to Attorney General Jeff Sessions and FBI Director Christopher Wray. The letter details issues with Swetnick\u2019s allegations and the subsequent contradictions by both the accuser and her lawyer.
\u201cIt is ironic that Senator Grassley now is interested in investigations,\u201d Avenatti, who is also the lawyer for pornographic performer Stormy Daniels, wrote on Twitter .
\u201cHe didn\u2019t care when it came to putting a man on the [Supreme Court] for life. We welcome the investigation as now we can finally get to the bottom of Judge Kavanaugh\u2019s lies and conduct. Let the truth be known.\u201d
Grassley\u2019s letter outlines the steps the committee took immediately after learning that Avenatti posted a Twitter message alleging to have evidence incriminating Kavanaugh and his friend, Mark Judge. The letter notes that Swetnick is a former client of the law firm of Debra Katz, the attorney for Ford.
Swetnick\u2019s sworn statement included an inconsistency with Avenatti\u2019s early claim about the location of the alleged events, Grassley noted. While Avenatti alleged misconduct at parties in Washington, Swetnick\u2019s statement included an allegation of misconduct at a party during \u201cBeach Week\u201d in Maryland in addition to Washington.
\u201cNotably, Ms. Swetnick submitted her statement broadening the area of the alleged incidents from Washington, D. C. to Ocean City, Maryland, only after the Committee publicly released Judge Kavanaugh\u2019s 1982 calendar which included a notation for Beach Week during the week of June 6-12,\u201d Grassley wrote.
Kavanaugh, in a sworn interview with the committee, denied all of Swetnick\u2019s allegations, which remain unsubstantiated and unverified. The Epoch Times could not verify any of the claims and refrains from publishing the details.
Grassley goes on to point out four major contradictions between Swetnick\u2019s sworn statement and her statements in a subsequent television interview.
The letter also points to the lack of credible evidence that Kavanaugh and Swetnick ever knew each other. Kavanaugh and Judge both told the committee under penalty of perjury that they don\u2019t know Swetnick. A letter by 64 men and women who knew Kavanaugh in high school noted, \u201cIn the extensive amount of time we collectively spent with Brett, we do not recall having ever met someone named Julie Swetnick.\u201d
The only evidence that Kavanaugh and Swetnick knew each other was produced belatedly by Avenatti in the form of a statement from an anonymous source. Neither the committee nor the media could track down the source for an interview.
\u201cIndeed, it is unclear who actually wrote the anonymous declaration,\u201d Grassley wrote. \u201cMr. Avenatti also apparently has a history of claiming to have anonymous clients who never materialize in any verifiable form.\u201d
Grassley\u2019s referral also details several issues with Swetnick\u2019s credibility. A former boyfriend told the committee that after he ended his seven-year relationship with Swetnick, she stalked and harassed him. Upon learning that the ex-boyfriend was dating another woman, Swetnick threatened to kill him, his girlfriend, and their unborn child. She also said she would falsely accuse him of rape and have him deported.
The Senate confirmed Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court on Oct. 6. None of the allegations against Kavanaugh were found to be substantiated. President Donald Trump personally apologized to Kavanaugh and his family for the treatment they received during the confirmation hearings.<\/p>\n

\n

Similarity rank: 16<\/div>\n

Sentiment rank: -1.5<\/div>\n

<\/div>\n

TW posts: 1<\/div>\n

TW reposts: 0<\/div>\n

TW likes: 0<\/div>\n

TW sentiment: 0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n