<!--DEBUG:--><!--DEBUG:dc3-united-states-software-in-english-pdf-2--><!--DEBUG:--><!--DEBUG:dc3-united-states-software-in-english-pdf-2--><!--DEBUG-spv-->{"id":1273035,"date":"2018-11-24T17:25:00","date_gmt":"2018-11-24T15:25:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/nhub.news\/?p=1273035"},"modified":"2018-11-24T18:11:28","modified_gmt":"2018-11-24T16:11:28","slug":"pokemon-go-shiny-pokemon-and-the-odds-of-finding-one-in-the-wild-fgr","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/nhub.news\/fr\/2018\/11\/pokemon-go-shiny-pokemon-and-the-odds-of-finding-one-in-the-wild-fgr\/","title":{"rendered":"Pokemon Go Shiny Pokemon and the Odds of Finding One in the Wild \u2013 FGR"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><b>The very first shiny Pokemon in Pokemon Go were introduced last year in March, and Trainers around the world had a chance to catch shiny Magikarp and<\/b><br \/>\nThe very first shiny Pokemon in Pokemon Go were introduced last year in March, and Trainers around the world had a chance to catch shiny Magikarp and shiny Gyarados.<br \/>Until today, the game introduced more than 100 shiny Pokemon, and most of the players got a chance to catch more than 2\/3. Some caught less, while some are still thinking that Niantic has something against them and that some accounts have a higher chance to find a shiny Pokemon in the wild. Well, the part is not true\u2026it all comes down to RNG and probability.<br \/>A Pokemon Go player from Buffalo, Lvl 38 Team Mystic, made an \u2018Actual probability of finding a shiny Pokemon\u2019 research on TSR, explaining what are the chances of finding a shiny Pokemon in the wild.<br \/>\u201c The odds of tapping a single Pokemon and encountering a shiny are debatable. Some say it\u2019s 1\/256 while others say it\u2019s more like 1\/512. I\u2019ll discuss both and I\u2019ll use Makuhita as a reference. <br \/>(1\/512)<br \/>If you tap a Makuhita, the probability of it being shiny is, let\u2019s say, 1\/512. Now, this doesn\u2019t mean that tapping 512 Makuhita guarantees a shiny. The probability of finding at least one shiny Makuhita after tapping 512 Makuhita = 1 \u2013 the probability of not finding a single shiny Makuhita.<br \/>This equals to 1 \u2013 (511\/512)512 = 0.632 or 63.2% chance. That is less than two third! There is a whopping 36.8% chance you won\u2019t see a single shiny Makuhita after tapping 512 Makuhitas. Similarly, If you tap 1000 Makuhitas, the probability of finding at least one shiny = 1 \u2013 (511\/512)1000 = 0.8585<br \/>That is still a 14.15% chance of not finding a shiny Makuhita after 1000 \u2018seen\u2019.<br \/>(1\/256)<br \/>Similarly, If we take the probability of a Pokemon being shiny as 1\/256, the probability of not finding a single shiny after: 256 \u2018seen\u2019 = 36.72% 512 \u2018seen\u2019 = 13.48% 1000 \u2018seen\u2019 = 2% .\u201d<br \/>Basically, it\u2019s just a random luck, because they are very rare and there is no way that one can increase the chance of finding a shiny Pokemon. With all that being said, it\u2019s all about RNG and Probability!<br \/>For last, all credit goes to \u2018our math teacher\u2019 kramer753, and big thanks for letting us use his research. Don\u2019t forget to give him an upvote for his hard work!<\/p>\n<script>jQuery(function(){jQuery(\".vc_icon_element-icon\").css(\"top\", \"0px\");});<\/script><script>jQuery(function(){jQuery(\"#td_post_ranks\").css(\"height\", \"10px\");});<\/script><script>jQuery(function(){jQuery(\".td-post-content\").find(\"p\").find(\"img\").hide();});<\/script>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The very first shiny Pokemon in Pokemon Go were introduced last year in March, and Trainers around the world had a chance to catch shiny Magikarp and The very first shiny Pokemon in Pokemon Go were introduced last year in March, and Trainers around the world had a chance to catch shiny Magikarp and shiny [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":1273034,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[93],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/nhub.news\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1273035"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/nhub.news\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/nhub.news\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/nhub.news\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/nhub.news\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1273035"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/nhub.news\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1273035\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1273036,"href":"http:\/\/nhub.news\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1273035\/revisions\/1273036"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/nhub.news\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1273034"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/nhub.news\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1273035"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/nhub.news\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1273035"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/nhub.news\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1273035"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}