For the first time, prosecutors have tried to link US president to a federal crime, for not declaring payments made for \u2018influencing\u2019 an election<\/b>
\nThe Justice Department says President Donald Trump directed illegal payments to buy the silence of two women whose claims of extramarital affairs threatened his presidential campaign \u2013 the first time prosecutors have claimed Trump is connected to a federal crime.
In a court filing, prosecutors said former Trump lawyer and fixer Michael Cohen arranged the secret payments at the height of the 2016 campaign \u201cin coordination with and at the direction of\u201d Trump. Cohen has previously said Trump was involved in the hush-money scheme, but court documents filed before Cohen\u2019s sentencing made clear prosecutors believe the claim.
The filing stopped short of accusing the president of committing a crime. Whether a president can be prosecuted while in office is a matter of legal dispute.
But there\u2019s no ambiguity in Friday\u2019s filing that prosecutors believe Cohen\u2019s act was criminal and Trump was directly involved, a remarkable disclosure with potential political and legal ramifications for a president dogged by investigations. The payments are likely to be a target for House Democrats who want to investigate the president next year. It\u2019s unclear whether Trump faces legal jeopardy over his role.
Federal law requires any payments made \u201cfor the purposes of influencing\u201d an election must be reported in campaign finance disclosures. The court filing on Friday makes clear the payments were made to benefit Trump politically.
In August, Cohen pleaded guilty to eight criminal charges, including campaign finance violations, and detailed an illegal operation to stifle sex stories and distribute hush money to buy the silence of porn actress Stormy Daniels and former Playboy model Karen McDougal, who both claimed they had affairs with Trump. Trump has denied having an affair.
Daniels, whose real name is Stephanie Clifford, was paid US$130,000 as part of a nondisclosure agreement signed days before the 2016 election and is currently suing to dissolve that contract.
Trump denied in April knowing anything about Cohen\u2019s payments to Daniels, though the explanations from the president and his lawyer Rudy Giuliani have changed several times since then.
In August 2016, the National Enquirer \u2019s parent company reached a US$150,000 deal to pay McDougal for her story about a 2006 affair, which it never published \u2013 a tabloid practice known as catch and kill. In 2015, the company\u2019s chairman met Cohen and Trump and \u201coffered help with negative stories\u201d about Trump\u2019s relationships with women by buying the rights to the stories, prosecutors said.
After McDougal contacted the Enquirer, the chairman of its parent company American Media contacted Cohen about the story. After Cohen promised the company would be reimbursed, the Enquirer paid McDougal US$150,000, according to court documents.
An audio recording released by Cohen in July appeared to capture Trump and Cohen discussing buying the rights to McDougal\u2019s story from American Media. Trump\u2019s lawyers said the payments were never made.
Legal experts have said the issue of whether Trump violated the law would come down to whether Trump tried to influence the election and whether he knew it was legally improper.
Former Sen. John Edwards, who sought the Democratic presidential nomination in 2008, was indicted in 2011 in connection with payments made on his behalf by a wealthy campaign donor to keep Edwards\u2019 lover quiet, which prosecutors argued amounted to illegal campaign contributions.
Edwards argued the payments were meant to keep his wife from learning about the affair \u2013 not to protect his campaign \u2013 and were therefore not political donations.
A jury acquitted the North Carolina Democrat of one charge and deadlocked on the rest in 2012. The Justice Department did not retry the case.<\/p>\n