WASHINGTON \u2014 A bipartisan group of federal legislators from the D. C. region is criticizing the executive order issued by President Donald Trump that puts a hiring freeze on much of the federal government.
Trump signed a memorandum Monday, temporarily freezing hiring for some federal government workers as a way to reduce payrolls and rein in the size of the federal workforce.
\u201cAn across-the-board federal hiring freeze is a mindless way to manage,\u201d said Rep. Gerry Connolly, D-Virginia. Connolly claimed the freeze would \u201chave a depressing effect on our ability to recruit and retain the next generation of federal workers.\u201d
Also in Virginia, Rep. Barbara Comstock, a Republican, said she does not support \u201cthis type of across-the-board freeze.\u201d
\u201cThe federal budget cannot be balanced on the backs of our federal workforce,\u201d Comstock said. \u201cIt is better to look at priorities and areas where appropriate cuts can be made and where we can consolidate efforts or identify unnecessary costs that can be eliminated.\u201d
Trump had raised the possibility of a hiring freeze during the campaign. At a news conference Monday, press secretary Sean Spicer said the freeze ensures taxpayers get effective and efficient government and said it \u201ccounters the dramatic expansion of the federal workforce in recent years.\u201d
The Office of Personnel Management says the federal government hired 221,000 workers in fiscal 2015, the most recent year for which data is available. The number excludes uniformed military personnel.
\u201cSuch a freeze is inefficient, costly and counterproductive,\u201d said Sen. Ben Cardin, D-Maryland. \u201cWe cannot attract and maintain highly qualified personnel with such draconian steps that cut off the pipeline of fresh and experienced talent.\u201d
Sen. Chris Van Hollen, D-Maryland, called Trump\u2019s order a \u201cknee-jerk decision\u201d and \u201cshort-sighted.\u201d
\u201cThe size of each federal agency\u2019s workforce should rise or fall based on the priority of their missions, not an arbitrary freeze,\u201d Van Hollen said.
D. C. Delegate Eleanor Holmes Norton, also a Democrat, spoke out against the order on Twitter, calling it an \u201cattack\u201d on federal employees.
The hiring freeze temporarily prevents federal agencies from filling vacant positions and creating new positions, except when necessary to meet national or public security responsibilities, Spicer said.
In addition, the order prohibits agencies from hiring private contractors to perform work \u201cto circumvent the intent\u201d of Trump\u2019s memo. Federal agencies can reallocate money \u201cto meet the highest priority needs and to ensure that essential services are not interrupted and national security is not affected,\u201d the memo read.
Trump\u2019s memo said the hiring freeze would remain in effect until his administration recommends a long-term plan for reducing the size of the federal government\u2019s workforce through attrition. That plan is due within 90 days, according to the memo.
The Associated Press contributed to this report.
comments
Follow @WTOP on Twitter and like us on Facebook .
\u00a9 2017 WTOP. All Rights Reserved.
Need a break? Play a quick game of solitaire or Sudoku. Or take one of our fun quizzes!
See photos of Saturday’s demonstration in D. C.<\/p>\n

\n

\nSimilarity rank: 4.3\n<\/div>\n

Sentiment rank: -1.1<\/div>\n

\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n