A day after President Trump signed an executive order halting refugees and nationals from seven Muslim-majority countries from entering the United States, several legislators — so far, all of them Democrats — are condemning the immigration action.
\u201cDuring the Holocaust we failed to fulfill to our duty to humanity,\u201d Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Illinois, warned in a statement Friday, also commemorated internationally as Holocaust Remembrance Day. \u201cWe cannot allow mindless fear to lead us into another regretful chapter in our history.\u201d
\u201cHistory will judge where America\u2019s leaders stood today,\u201d Durbin continued. \u201cFaced with the humanitarian crisis of our time, the United States cannot turn its back on children fleeing persecution, genocide, and terror.\u201d
The executive order — signed by Mr. Trump the same day the White House issued a statement on the Holocaust promising to \u201cmake love and tolerance prevalent throughout the world\u201d — directed the State Department to stop the processing of Syrian refugees indefinitely. It also included a four-month suspension of the broader U. S. refugee program and a ban on citizens from seven countries with majority Muslim populations (Iran, Iraq, Syria, Yemen, Sudan, Somalia and Libya) traveling to the U. S. Mr. Trump has also said his refugee plan will prioritize Christians fleeing persecution over those with other religious affiliations.
Mr. Trump\u2019s actions were felt immediately: the crackdown on the refugee program was swift, with refugees — traveling in the air to the U. S. when the order was signed — already encountering detentions upon their arrival at U. S. airports. According to one New York Times report, at least one of the Iraqis detained at John F. Kennedy International Airport had worked on behalf of the U. S. government in Iraq for a decade.
Sen. Claire McCaskill referenced the Times report in a critical tweet early Saturday, saying the incident \u201cmakes me want to throw up.\u201d
This makes me want to throw up. pic.twitter.com\/R7Gf9Yc5Js
Sen. Jeff Merkley of Oregon, a Democrat and member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, slammed the immigration order as a \u201csmokescreen for religious discrimination that is entirely contrary to our founding values and core constitutional principles.\u201d
Another Senate Foreign Relations Committee member, Sen. Chris Murphy, D-Connecticut, went further: In an op-ed that ran Friday in the Huffington Post, Murphy predicted ominously that Mr. Trump\u2019s proposals were \u201clikely to get Americans killed.\u201d
\u201cThe ban doesn\u2019t cover every Muslim globally,\u201d Murphy wrote, \u201cjust a set of Muslims from countries Trump perceives, rather arbitrarily, to be dangerous.\u201d
\u201c[T]he fact that every country on today\u2019s list is a Muslim-majority nation confirms that he meant what he said — that Muslims are dangerous and need to be treated differently than any other set of people,\u201d he said.
Sen. Bob Casey, in a series of tweets, called the executive order details even \u201cmore troubling than the initial reports\u201d and observed that signing the action was a largely political move.
I’ve had classified briefings, voted for legislation to improve screening. @realDonaldTrump executive order is about politics, not security. https:\/\/t.co\/rwxTSeeOMu
. @realDonaldTrump ‘s exec order imposes a religious test on refugees- it is deeply inconsistent w\/ our values & won’t make our nation safer.
Escaping religious tests is exactly why people colonized America 400 years ago. Subjecting refugees to such a test is not who we are.
A host of other Democratic legislators blasted the order, with some, like Rep. Keith Ellison of Minnesota, striking a tone of solidarity with refugees affected by the ban.
\u201cTo everyone afraid of what this executive order will mean for you and your country, I say: \u2018You are not alone. We are with you. And we will fight for you.\u2019\u201d
Republicans, for their part, have largely remained silent since Mr. Trump signed the order.
Still, several lawmakers have, in the past, condemned prioritizing certain religions over others when it comes to immigration to the U. S.
In July, House Speaker Paul Ryan tweeted a statement saying he rejected then-candidate Trump\u2019s proposed Muslim ban.
\u201cA religious test for entering our country is not reflective of America\u2019s fundamental values,\u201d Ryan wrote at the time.
Despite his previous stance, Ryan, in a statement released Friday, praised Mr. Trump\u2019s latest executive order.
\u201cOur number one responsibility is to protect the homeland,\u201d Ryan wrote, calling the U. S. a \u201ccompassionate nation\u201d but that it was \u201ctime to reevaluate and strengthen the visa vetting process.\u201d
\u201cPresident Trump,\u201d he added, \u201cis right to make sure we are doing everything possible to know exactly who is entering our country.\u201d
Similarly, in December of 2015, then-Indiana Gov. Mike Pence tweeted his own message about Mr. Trump\u2019s call to bar Muslims from stepping foot in the U. S., which he said was \u201coffensive and unconstitutional.\u201d
Calls to ban Muslims from entering the U. S. are offensive and unconstitutional.
Pence, now the vice president, stood by Mr. Trump on Friday as the president signed his executive order.<\/p>\n

\n

\nSimilarity rank: 24\n<\/div>\n

Sentiment rank: -19.7<\/div>\n

\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n