<!--DEBUG:--><!--DEBUG:dc3-united-states-it-in-english-pdf-2--><!--DEBUG:--><!--DEBUG:dc3-united-states-it-in-english-pdf-2--><!--DEBUG-spv-->{"id":502897,"date":"2017-04-12T21:46:00","date_gmt":"2017-04-12T19:46:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/nhub.news\/?p=502897"},"modified":"2017-04-12T23:15:52","modified_gmt":"2017-04-12T21:15:52","slug":"blackberry-wins-something-for-once-815m-from-qualcomm","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/nhub.news\/fr\/2017\/04\/blackberry-wins-something-for-once-815m-from-qualcomm\/","title":{"rendered":"BlackBerry wins something for once: $815M from Qualcomm"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><b>It&rsquo;s due for a big refund on royalties it paid Qualcomm, a binding decision that the chipmaker says won&rsquo;t affect a similar case with Apple.<\/b> <br \/>BlackBerry bested Qualcomm in arbitration, to the tune of about $815 million. <br \/>BlackBerry won an $814.9 million award from chipmaker Qualcomm as a refund for royalty payments, the phone maker said Wednesday . <br \/>The award, which resulted from an arbitration process, effectively ends the licensing dispute between the two companies. They were fighting over whether BlackBerry&rsquo;s royalties to Qualcomm should be included in an agreement that caps some licensing payments. In other words, should BlackBerry get money back for paying too much? <br \/>In a statement, Qualcomm said it disagrees. But it acknowledged the ruling is binding and can&rsquo;t be appealed. <br \/>Meanwhile, the chipmaker said, the arbitration ruling \u00ab\u00a0has no impact on agreements with any other licensee. \u00a0\u00bb <br \/>Qualcomm is also embroiled in a licensing lawsuit with Apple. <br \/>The award is a win for BlackBerry, which has grappled with diminished stature in the mobile phone market for years. After controlling nearly a fifth of phone sales in 2009, BlackBerry now powers less than half a percent of phones, in a market dominated by devices running Google&rsquo;s Android system and by Apple&rsquo;s iPhone. <br \/>The $814.9 million award is preliminary. As part of the arbitration process, the final award will be set at an upcoming hearing that will add in interest and attorneys&rsquo; fees.<\/p>\n<div id=\"td_post_ranks\" class=\"td-post-comments\" style=\"vertical-align: middle;\">\n<div style=\"float: left;\">Similarity rank: 1.1<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p><script>\njQuery(function() {\nvar mainContentMetaInfo = '.td-post-header .meta-info';\nvar tdPostRanks = '#td_post_ranks';\nif (jQuery(tdPostRanks).length) {\n    var tdPostRanksHtml = jQuery(tdPostRanks).get(0).outerHTML;\n    if (typeof tdPostRanksHtml != 'undefined') {\n        jQuery(tdPostRanks).remove();\n        jQuery(mainContentMetaInfo).append(tdPostRanksHtml);\n    }\n}\n});\n<\/script><span>\u00a9 Source: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.cnet.com\/news\/blackberry-qualcomm-apple-award-case-licensing-royalty\/\" target=\"_blank\">https:\/\/www.cnet.com\/news\/blackberry-qualcomm-apple-award-case-licensing-royalty\/<\/a><br \/>\nAll rights are reserved and belongs to a source media.<\/span><\/p>\n<script>jQuery(function(){jQuery(\"#td_post_ranks\").remove();});<\/script><script>jQuery(function(){jQuery(\".td-post-content\").find(\"p\").find(\"img\").hide();});<\/script>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>It&rsquo;s due for a big refund on royalties it paid Qualcomm, a binding decision that the chipmaker says won&rsquo;t affect a similar case with Apple. BlackBerry bested Qualcomm in arbitration, to the tune of about $815 million. BlackBerry won an $814.9 million award from chipmaker Qualcomm as a refund for royalty payments, the phone maker [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":502896,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[90],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/nhub.news\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/502897"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/nhub.news\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/nhub.news\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/nhub.news\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/nhub.news\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=502897"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/nhub.news\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/502897\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":502898,"href":"http:\/\/nhub.news\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/502897\/revisions\/502898"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/nhub.news\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/502896"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/nhub.news\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=502897"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/nhub.news\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=502897"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/nhub.news\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=502897"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}