) : The Environmental Protection Agency has declined to renew the terms of several scientific advisory board members.<\/b>
\nThe Environmental Protection Agency has dismissed several members of a key scientific advisory board.
All the dismissed members of the Board of Scientific Counselors, which had 18 members, were finishing up their three-year terms, although these terms are frequently renewed. The science advisory board plays a key role in assessing the quality of scientific research from the agency, and can help shape future research.
So far, at least five members have been dismissed, according to a report by The New York Times .
A spokesman for the EPA said that some of these advisers may be replaced with people from industries that are typically regulated by the EPA, assuming the appointments do not pose a conflict of interest.
\u00ab\u00a0The administrator believes we should have people on this board who understand the impact of regulations on the regulated community, \u00a0\u00bb the EPA spokesman, J. P. Freire, told The New York Times.
Robert Richardson, an ecological economist and an associate professor at Michigan State University’s Department of Community Sustainability, was among the scientists whose terms were not renewed.
\u00ab\u00a0I’ve never heard of any circumstance where someone didn’t serve two consecutive terms, \u00a0\u00bb Richardson told The Washington Post .
\u00ab\u00a0The role that science has played in the agency in the past, this step is a significant step in a different direction, \u00a0\u00bb Richardson told Science . \u00ab\u00a0Anecdotally, based on what we know about the administrator, I think it will be science that will appear to be friendlier to industry, the fossil fuel industry, the chemical industry, and I think it will be science that marginalizes climate change science.\u00a0\u00bb
This isn’t the first time that a shake-up at the EPA has drawn controversy. The Trump administration also drew fire for taking down the agency’s climate change pages.
Originally published on Live Science .<\/p>\n

\n

Similarity rank: 1.1<\/div>\n

Sentiment rank: -0.3<\/div>\n

<\/div>\n<\/div>\n