We also came away with some new questions.<\/b>
\nWASHINGTON \u2014 On Monday, we learned much more about the moment that brought down Michael Flynn, the national security adviser whom President Trump fired less than a month into the job for misleading Vice President Mike Pence about his conversations with Russia\u2019s ambassador to the United States.
But we were also left with questions about why the White House waited 18 days after finding out Flynn misled them to fire him.
Former acting attorney general Sally Yates and former director of national intelligence James Clapper testified about all this Monday before a Senate judiciary subcommittee. Here are five new things we learned \u2013 and some questions raised:
In December, before Trump assumed office, Flynn talked to Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak about potentially lifting U. S. sanctions President Barack Obama had just levied on Russia. These sanctions were punishment for alleged Russian meddling in the election to try to help Trump win.
About a week before Trump\u2019s Jan. 20 inauguration, the world learned that Flynn and the ambassador were talking. Pence then went on CBS News\u2019 \u201cFace the Nation\u201d and said Flynn\u2019s conversations with Kislyak \u201chad nothing to do\u201d with sanctions.
But Yates had intelligence showing otherwise. Flynn\u2019s conversations with Kislyak were picked up by the FBI during \u201croutine surveillance\u201d of the Russian ambassador, and she knew they had talked about sanctions.
She went straight to the White House\u2019s top lawyer, Don McGahn, to tell him that Flynn was lying to them. She did it for two reasons, she said in her testimony:
\u201cWe had two concerns. Compromise was certainly the number one concern. And the Russians use compromise material information in a variety of ways, sometimes overtly, sometimes subtly. And again our concern was that you have a very sensitive position like the national security adviser and you don\u2019 t want that person to be in a position where the Russians have leverage over them.\u201d
Yates testified that she told McGahn that Flynn was lying so they could do something about it. She said McGahn called her back the next day to talk more. Specifically, she said, he wanted to know:
Why does it matter to Yates\u2019 Justice Department if one White House official lies to another? (She explained it was because Flynn could be blackmailed by the Russians for being caught in a lie that the Russians knew was a lie.)
Would the Justice Department pursue a criminal case against Flynn? (Yates did not go into detail on this. She did say that the FBI had recently interviewed Flynn as part of its investigation into Russia meddling in the U. S. election. We also know the Pentagon\u2019s watchdog is investigating payments Flynn, a retired general, received from Turkey and Russia without first getting permission from the U. S. government.)
Yates said she doesn\u2019 t know what the White House did with this information. (Trump fired her a few days later for saying she wouldn\u2019 t defend Trump\u2019s travel ban.)
We can gain some insight from looking at public statements from the White House around that time. In February, White House Chief of Staff Reince Priebus said on \u201cFace the Nation\u201d that McGahn decided not to take action: \u201cOur legal counsel got a heads-up from Sally Yates that something wasn\u2019 t adding up with his story. And then so our legal department went into a review of the situation.\u2026 The legal department came back and said they didn\u2019 t see anything wrong with what was actually said.\u201d
It was only after The Washington Post reported about the contradictions between Flynn\u2019s statements and what really transpired that Trump fired Flynn.
The FBI regularly spies on who the Russian ambassador to Washington talks to. But by law, the identity of U. S. citizens\u2019 conversations are kept secret from all but a handful of top intelligence officials, including someone in Yates\u2019 position.
Which begs the question: Who \u201cunmasked\u201d Flynn\u2019s identity to her, and who leaked that identity to the media? Before Yates took the witness stand, Trump tried to draw both those lines back to her.
Ask Sally Yates, under oath, if she knows how classified information got into the newspapers soon after she explained it to W. H. Counsel.
Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, directly asked Yates on Monday whether she leaked information to the media or whether she asked the intelligence community to reveal Flynn\u2019s identity to her. She said no.
Republicans seemed intent on getting to the bottom of who did. They have also pointed the finger at Susan Rice, who was Obama\u2019s national security adviser. Rice recently acknowledged that she did request to unmask Trump campaign and transition officials who were mentioned in foreign surveillance intelligence reports. There\u2019s no evidence she used that information for anything but her official duties.
Around the same time this was all happening, Yates became a hero on the left for announcing that she would not defend Trump\u2019s original executive order attempting to temporarily ban travelers from seven majority-Muslim countries.
She told senators on Monday that she thought the ban was \u201cunlawful\u201d and that she couldn\u2019 t defend it in court. Trump fired her.
\u201cIt\u2019s up to the courts to decide, and not you, correct?\u201d Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, said. \u201d\u2026 I have to tell you, I find it enormously disappointing.\u201d
We\u2019 ve had a couple of these public congressional hearings on Russia this year. And in nearly every single one, the top Democrat on the committee spends time outlining the Trump administration\u2019s connections to Russia, as Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, R. I., did Monday:
\u201cWe know that President Trump himself has long pursued business deals in Russia. He is reported to have done or sought to do business there since the mid-1990s.. One Trump property in midtown Manhattan had become, within a few years of opening, \u2018a prominent depository of Russian money,\u2019 according to a report in Bloomberg Businessweek.\u2026 In testimony before the Judiciary Committee last Wednesday, FBI Director Comey acknowledged that financial leverage has been exploited by Russian intelligence \u201cover many decades.\u201d
Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form
Send questions\/comments to the editors.<\/p>\n

\n

Similarity rank: 19<\/div>\n

Sentiment rank: 0.8<\/div>\n

<\/div>\n

TW posts: 0<\/div>\n

TW reposts: 0<\/div>\n

TW likes: 0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n