The revelation that President Donald Trump reportedly disclosed highly sensitive information to Russian officials is raising questions among some allied intelligence agencies about the security of details they share with their US counterparts.<\/b>
\n\u00ab\u00a0It’s a big deal, and we want to make sure sensitive information is handled properly, \u00a0\u00bb a European diplomat told CNN, adding that the country represented by the diplomat would not cut communications with the US entirely but could potentially reassess what information is transmitted at the political level.
The diplomat — who spoke to CNN on the condition that neither their name nor country were identified — said allied agencies could explore ways to share specific information through channels used only by military and intelligence officials.
Another European diplomat told CNN that Europeans are expecting cooperative exchanges with the US on this matter and to avoid US unilateral measures.
An EU-US meeting on airline security and electronics devices Wednesday afternoon in Brussels will allow US deputy secretary Elaine Duke to share information with EU allies, the diplomat told CNN.
\u00ab\u00a0It is somewhat surprising, though, that intel was shared on this issue, with Russian Minister (Sergey) Lavrov, before being shared with ministers of allied countries, \u00a0\u00bb the diplomat said.
A third diplomatic source representing a country that shares intelligence with both Russia and the US told CNN that since Trump’s reported revelations seemed to be a mistake, there is less concern than if the information was deliberately shared by the CIA to another country.
\u00ab\u00a0He made a mistake … It likely won’t happen again, \u00a0\u00bb the diplomatic source said.
Ultimately, Trump’s disclosure of sensitive information is unlikely to prevent future sharing of intelligence between the US and the source’s country because cooperation is done for \u00ab\u00a0mutual benefit, \u00a0\u00bb the source added.
Former defense secretary and CIA Director Leon Panetta told CNN’s Chris Cuomo Tuesday that the fallout of breaching the trust of key allies by disclosing information could be significant.
\u00ab\u00a0You don’t just get intelligence out of thin air. You get intelligence because we deploy spies, because we deploy people who are willing to put their lives on the line and because we work with other intelligence agencies around the world that help provide that kind of information, \u00a0\u00bb he said on \u00ab\u00a0New Day.\u00a0\u00bb \u00ab\u00a0But it is done on the basis of competence and trust.\u00a0\u00bb
According to Panetta, the ally who provided the information that was reportedly relayed to the Russians could cut off any type of intelligence provided to the US in the future.
‘We’re not going to cut the cord’
But despite claims that Trump relayed information that could pose serious national security challenges for the US and its allies, the first European diplomat said officials are waiting to see how the situation plays out before making any decisions regarding the level of intelligence sharing with the US.
While there have been some early conversations about new ways to protect shared information, the diplomat emphasized that the professionalism and the scope of work by US intelligence officials make it essential to maintain close ties.
Like many US allies, the diplomat represents a country whose intelligence agencies work so closely with the US on issues like Syria that it would be very hard to stop that cooperation altogether.
Although pulling back \u00ab\u00a0is something we could envision, \u00a0\u00bb the diplomat said, \u00ab\u00a0we’re not going to cut the cord.\u00a0\u00bb
The US is part of the so-called \u00ab\u00a0Five Eyes\u00a0\u00bb agreement (along with Britain, Canada, Australia and New Zealand) , which calls for open sharing among member nations of a broad range of intelligence.
The US also maintains open intelligence-sharing relationships with allies like France, Germany and Japan. In the Middle East, the US formally and informally shares information with several countries in the fight against ISIS and other terror groups including Jordan, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and Turkey, among others.
Serious implications of Trump disclosure
Indications that allies are discussing the possibility of reconsidering their information-sharing relationships with the US comes in the wake of Monday’s bombshell Washington Post report, major details of which were confirmed by CNN, that Trump had shared with the Russians information provided by a foreign partner agency.
The information that \u00ab\u00a0endangered cooperation from an ally that has access to the inner workings of the Islamic State, \u00a0\u00bb according to the Post, was reportedly so sensitive that details were withheld from other international partners and restricted even within the US government.
Trump’s national security adviser, H. R. McMaster, said Tuesday that he stands by his previous statement on The Washington Post report — he said the story \u00ab\u00a0as reported is false\u00a0\u00bb — adding, \u00ab\u00a0The premise of that article is false that in any way the President had a conversation that was inappropriate or that resulted in any kind of lapse in national security.\u00a0\u00bb
McMaster said he has not spoken to foreign nations regarding the reports and intelligence sharing.
Israeli intelligence was a source for some of the information ISIS bomb-making capabilities that the President reportedly discussed with Russian diplomats, according to US and diplomatic officials.
Israeli’s ambassador to the United States, Ron Dermer, would not comment on the intelligence, but expressed confidence in the relationship with the US.
The potential consequences of disclosing such sensitive information could hardly be more serious, former CIA case officer Bob Baer told CNN’s Erin Burnett on Monday.
\u00ab\u00a0The President, by revealing this to the Russians, has lost control of this information. It’s going to go to the Syrians, It’s going to go to the Iranians — Russian allies, \u00a0\u00bb Baer said.
\u00ab\u00a0The ability to protect that source whoever he is, wherever he is has been seriously undermined. … If a CIA officer had revealed this information to the Russians, he would be fired instantly.\u00a0\u00bb<\/p>\n

\n

Similarity rank: 23<\/div>\n

Sentiment rank: 1.2<\/div>\n

<\/div>\n

TW posts: 19<\/div>\n

TW reposts: 0<\/div>\n

TW likes: 0<\/div>\n

TW sentiment: 10<\/div>\n<\/div>\n