The feud is real.<\/b>
\nIt’s officially on.
Breitbart News, with former White House chief strategist Stephen K. Bannon back in charge, is ripping mad at President Trump after Monday’s Afghanistan speech foreshadowed an increase in ground troops.
Just look at this homepage:
That’s five incredibly critical headlines from a website that cheered Trump to victory. The accompanying articles might be even tougher. Here are key excerpts from the stories, numbered clockwise, from left:
In the hours before the president delivered his prime-time address, I wrote that the speech would be a test for the next phase of his relationship with Bannon, who left Breitbart a year ago to become chief executive of Trump’s campaign and then served as his top strategist in the White House until Friday. I figured that Bannon wouldn’t like what Trump had to say and that his displeasure would show up in Breitbart’s coverage.
But wow. I was not prepared for this level of fury.
What’s striking about Breitbart’s coverage is the way its writers took direct aim at Trump, instead of his advisers.
The best example is the headline that refers to \u201cPresident H. R. McMaster, \u201d Trump’s national security adviser. It’s a play on a memorable New York Times editorial headline from January: \u201c President Bannon? \u201d (A Times editorial published on the day of Bannon’s ouster read, \u201c Farewell, President Bannon.\u00a0\u00bb)
Bannon knows better than anyone how deeply the perception that someone else is calling the shots wounds Trump’s pride. By suggesting that McMaster is the \u201cpresident, \u201d Bannon is trolling Trump. Hard.
The other thing that stands out in Breitbart’s coverage is zero tolerance for Trump’s spin, which the site typically amplifies. Trump did his best on Monday to paint his reversal on sending more troops to Afghanistan as a result of gaining a better understanding of the situation than he had before his election.
\u201cMy original instinct was to pull out \u2014 and, historically, I like following my instincts, \u201d he said. \u201cBut all my life I’ve heard that decisions are much different when you sit behind the desk in the Oval Office; in other words, when you’re president of the United States.\u201d
Breitbart isn’t buying it. As Raheem Kassam put it, \u201cthis isn\u2019 t about changing his perspective on the war.\u2026 This was about the swamp getting to him.\u201d
Contrast that take with what Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) wrote on Twitter Monday night.
Everything is backward. Rubio \u2014 Trump’s primary rival, whom Breitbart attacked mercilessly \u2014 is defending the president’s evolution, using the same argument as the president himself. Meanwhile, the \u201ccommentators\u201d Rubio is calling out include the writers at Breitbart, who are now slamming Trump.
None of this means that Breitbart is jumping off the Trump Train permanently. But it sure looks like the feud between Bannon and his former boss is real \u2014 and ready to flare up whenever he thinks the president is betraying a campaign promise.<\/p>\n

\n

Similarity rank: 37<\/div>\n

Sentiment rank: -0.5<\/div>\n

<\/div>\n<\/div>\n