With the rules coming off the books, how is your Internet experience likely to change?<\/b>
\nMonday marked the official end of the federal government\u2019s net neutrality rules, the Obama-era regulations that said Internet providers can\u2019t block or slow down websites, or prioritize their own content over others. With the rules coming off the books, how is your Internet experience likely to change? Here\u2019s what you need to know.
Q. What\u2019s net neutrality, again?
A. Net neutrality is an idea about equal access to Internet content. Under its principles, Internet providers shouldn\u2019t interfere with your ability to reach the websites, apps or services of your choice. If you\u2019re a fan of Netflix, for example, net neutrality holds that you should be able to watch its shows without running into impediments your ISP puts up that are designed to push you toward a competing service, such as Hulu.
Many supporters of net neutrality also interpret the concept to mean that broadband companies shouldn\u2019t offer online companies \u201cfast lanes,\u201d or faster delivery to Internet users\u2019 devices, particularly if it involves extra fees the websites must pay for the special treatment. That tactic, which experts call \u201cpaid prioritization,\u201d runs the risk of creating an uneven playing field where big, dominant Internet companies can afford the fast lanes while start-ups or small businesses get left behind, net neutrality activists say.
Q. What were the net neutrality rules?
A. In 2015, the Federal Communications Commission sought to codify these principles into formalized regulations. Led by its then-Democratic chairman, Tom Wheeler, the FCC approved rules that banned the blocking and slowing of Web content by Internet providers. A third rule banned the practice of paid prioritization, or the offering of the Internet \u201cfast lanes.\u201d And a fourth provision, a \u201cgeneral conduct\u201d standard, gave the FCC the ability to investigate broadband practices it believed could be problematic.
Q. Why are the rules going away?
A. Last December, the FCC under Republican Chairman Ajit Pai voted to roll back the rules. Pai, who had been a commissioner when the rules were first approved, is a longtime critic of the policy. He has argued that the regulations are too restrictive on businesses and discourage them from investing in network upgrades that could make your Internet service faster and better.
Q. What\u2019s the impact of the repeal?
A. The end of the bans on blocking, slowing and paid prioritization means that your Internet providers will now be free to engage in that activity without legal repercussions, so long as they disclose it to the public on their own websites or to the FCC.
The repeal effectively narrows what the federal government would consider a net neutrality violation. The new approach effective Monday hands much of the responsibility for enforcing violations to the Federal Trade Commission, a sister agency. And in its repeal decision, the FCC explicitly rejects the idea that it has much authority to regulate Internet providers at all.
Q. Is my Internet service about to slow to a crawl, like some activists claim?
A. Generally speaking, analysts say that specific scenario is pretty unlikely. Many Internet providers, such as AT&T and Verizon, have said they do not and will not block or slow content. Comcast has also said it does not block or slow content and has no plans to offer paid prioritization. Of course, these commitments could change in the future, and indeed, some close observers have noticed subtle shifts in Comcast\u2019s promises already. But the companies can\u2019t simply promise one thing and blatantly do another, at least not without risking FTC litigation.
What\u2019s more likely to occur are subtle changes to your Internet experience that you may or may not notice. It\u2019s hard to say what specific changes you might experience; part of the whole point of undoing the net neutrality rules is that Internet providers will begin to experiment with all-new business models we haven\u2019t seen before.
Here are a few tactics that have been tried before that have drawn scrutiny under the old net neutrality rules.
Q. Yes, finally! What\u2019s an example?
A. One is the offering of discounts on Internet service in exchange for letting your broadband provider mine your browsing history and other personal information.
Another might be getting unlimited wireless access to a mobile app that your Internet provider owns, while usage of other apps continues to count against your monthly data cap.
Q. Isn\u2019t Congress trying to reverse the repeal?
A. Some members of Congress are trying to push through a resolution that, if successful, would overturn the FCC\u2019s repeal vote. The measure aims to restore the agency\u2019s net neutrality rules as if the repeal had never happened. It has already passed the Senate.
Q. What are its chances in the House?
A. It\u2019s unclear. The House\u2019s Republican leadership has signaled its disinterest in putting the resolution to a vote.
Q. What else can we expect next?
A. More than 20 states have sued the FCC to stop the repeal. A federal appeals court in Washington is expected to hear that case in the coming months. We\u2019re also waiting to hear whether the Supreme Court will agree to hear a separate lawsuit on net neutrality.
Send questions\/comments to the editors.<\/p>\n

\n

Similarity rank: 29<\/div>\n

Sentiment rank: 0.3<\/div>\n

<\/div>\n<\/div>\n