They say he paid them $3,500 to pose as his attackers.<\/b>
\nCHICAGO \u2014 Two brothers stand at the center of the case that prosecutors will lay before jurors during the trial of Jussie Smollett this week. The former \u201cEmpire\u201d actor contends he was the victim of a racist and homophobic assault in downtown Chicago on a frigid night in January 2019. The siblings, who worked with him on the TV show, say he paid them $3,500 to pose as his attackers. Jury selection began Monday morning and six jurors had been seated in the Chicago courtroom by early afternoon. Judge James Linn, who said he expects the trial to take about one week, was asking potential jurors if they have been the victim of a hate crime, if they have watched \u201cEmpire\u201d or TMZ, a program and website about celebrities, or if they belong to any civil rights or pro-police organizations. Cameras are not allowed inside the courtroom and the proceedings are not being livestreamed, unlike in other recent high-profile trials. Smollett, who arrived at the courthouse with his mother and other family members, is accused of lying to police about the alleged attack and has been charged with felony disorderly conduct. A class 4 felony, the crime carries a prison sentence of up to three years but experts have said it is more likely that if Smollett is convicted he would be placed on probation and perhaps ordered to perform community service. Whether Smollett, who is Black and gay, testifies remains an open question. But the siblings, Abimbola and Olabinjo Osundairo, will take the witness stand where they are expected to repeat what they have told police officers and prosecutors: that they carried out the attack at Smollett\u2019s behest. Jurors also may see surveillance video from more than four dozen cameras that police reviewed to trace the brothers\u2019 movements before and after the reported attack, as well as a video showing the brothers purchasing a red hat, ski masks and gloves from a beauty supply shop hours earlier. Smollett\u2019s attorneys have not spelled out how they will confront that evidence and the lead attorney, Nenye Uche, declined to comment ahead of this week\u2019s proceedings. But there are clues as to how they might during the trial. Buried in nearly 500 pages of Chicago Police Department reports is a statement from an area resident who says she saw a white man with \u201creddish brown hair\u201d who appeared to be waiting for someone that night. She told a detective that when the man turned away from her, she \u201ccould see hanging out from underneath his jacket what appeared to be a rope.\u201d Her comments could back up Smollett\u2019s contention that his attackers draped a makeshift noose around his neck. Further, if she testified that the man was white, it would support Smollett\u2019s statements \u2013 widely ridiculed because the brothers, who come from Nigeria, are Black \u2013 that he saw pale or white skin around the eyes of one of his masked attackers. Given there is so much evidence, including the brothers\u2019 own statements, that they participated in the attack, it is unlikely that Smollett\u2019s attorneys will try to prove they did not take part. That could perhaps lead the defense to contend that Smollett was the victim of a very real attack at the hands of the brothers, perhaps with the help of others, who now are only implicating the actor so they won\u2019t be charged, too. The $3,500 check could be key, although Smollett says he wrote it to pay one of the brothers to work as his personal trainer. \u201cI would assume the defense is going to zero in on that,\u201d said Joe Lopez, a prominent defense attorney not involved with the case. What they will almost certainly do is attack the brothers\u2019 credibility, reminding jurors that they are not facing the same criminal charges as Smollett, despite admitting they took part in the staged attack. \u201cEverything Smollett is responsible for, they are responsible for,\u201d said David Erickson, a former state appellate judge who teaches at Chicago Kent College of Law and is not involved in the case. Finally, Smollett\u2019s career could take center stage. Prosecutors could make the same point that then-Police Superintendent Eddie Johnson made when he announced Smollett\u2019s arrest in 2019: that Smollett thought the attack would win him more fame and a pay raise. But Lopez said the defense attorneys might ask the jury the same question he asked himself. \u201cHow would that help him with anything?\u201d he asked. \u201cHe\u2019s already a star.\u201d Success. Please wait for the page to reload. If the page does not reload within 5 seconds, please refresh the page. Enter your email and password to access comments. Forgot Password? Don’t have a Talk profile? Create one. Invalid username\/password. Please check your email to confirm and complete your registration. Create a commenting profile by providing an email address, password and display name. You will receive an email to complete the registration. Please note the display name will appear on screen when you participate. Already registered? Log in to join the discussion. Only subscribers are eligible to post comments. Please subscribe or login to participate in the conversation. Here\u2019s why. Use the form below to reset your password. When you’ve submitted your account email, we will send an email with a reset code. Send questions\/comments to the editors. \u00ab Previous<\/p>\n