The FAA\u2019s drone database hit a major snag this week, courtesy of a U. S. Court of Appeals ruling. The D. C.-based court sided with drone hobbyist John Taylor, ..<\/b>
\nThe FAA\u2019s drone database hit a major snag this week, courtesy of a U. S. Court of Appeals ruling. The D. C.-based court sided with drone hobbyist John Taylor, who argued that the Federal Aviation Administration doesn\u2019 t have jurisdiction over what the law classifies as model aircraft.
\u201cTaylor does not think that the FAA had the statutory authority to issue the Registration Rule and require him to register, \u201d Circuit Judge Brett Kavanaugh wrote in the statement. \u201cTaylor is right.\u201d
The court argued that the drone registration database violates 2012\u2019s FAA Modernization and Reform Act, which states that the body, \u201cmay not promulgate any rule or regulation regarding a model aircraft.\u201d
The database was proposed in 2015 to addressing growing drone ownership in the U. S., which has brought with it a number of privacy and safety concerns in the government. The FAA will likely appeal the decision \u2013 or take another approach toward setting up a similar system.
\u201cWe are carefully reviewing the U. S. Court of Appeals decision as it relates to drone registrations, \u201d a spokesperson told TechCrunch. \u201cThe FAA put registration and operational regulations in place to ensure that drones are operated in a way that is safe and does not pose security and privacy threats. We are in the process of considering our options and response to the decision.\u201d
The Association for Unmanned Vehicle Systems International is similarly disappointed in the ruling. A rep from the organization provided TechCrunch with a comment from its CEO, Brian Wynne, stating,
Drone sales have been growing at an impressive rate in the U. S. According to NPD, they effectively doubled between February 2016 and 2017 in the States. Within the first year of the rule, 550,000 drones were registered, an act that carries a $5 fee and potential criminal charges for non-compliance.
The ruling is being considered a victory for hobbyists themselves, who have balked at the manner of limitations these sorts of regulations would impose. But some drone makers, like DJI, which is expected to unveil something big (or small, rather) next week, is actually on the FAA\u2019s side on this one.
\u201cThe FAA\u2019s innovative approach to drone registration was very reasonable, and registration provides for accountability and education to drone pilots, \u201d the company\u2019s VP of Policy & Legal Affairs Brendan Schulman said in a statement offered to TechCrunch. \u201cI expect the legal issue that impedes this program will be addressed by cooperative work between the industry and policymakers.\u201d<\/p>\n

\n

Similarity rank: 1.1<\/div>\n

Sentiment rank: -4.2<\/div>\n

<\/div>\n<\/div>\n