Self-driving cars are hitting the road, but with the first fatality, there\u2019s now a question that needs answering: Who\u2019s responsible?<\/b>
\nSelf-driving cars are supposed to be safer than human-operated cars. In fact, in 90% of car accidents, of which there are over 2 million a year, driver error causes the crash. So, in theory, take the driver out of it, and 90% of those accidents would disappear. But that still leaves the 10%, something that the first pedestrian fatality by self-driving car this week illustrated all too starkly. The victim, out walking in the early morning hours in Tempe, AZ, was hit by one of Uber\u2019s experimental self-driving cars. And underlying the tragedy is a larger problem: Who\u2019s to blame? And therein lies the problem; nobody knows, and nobody really wants to accept responsibility.
In most cases, car accidents are the fault of what lawyers call \u201ctraditional negligence\u201d: texting while driving, blowing through stop lights, pulling a left out of a right turn lane, and all the other stupid things people do that leave you screaming obscenities at them. But, in the rare cases where the brakes fail, the accelerator sticks, or the headlights short out, that\u2019s product liability; it\u2019s the car\u2019s fault, in other words. The advantage here is that one or the other is relatively easy to prove, and the proliferation of tools like dashcams, diagnostic computers, and crash data recorders has just made it easier. But once the car is driving, that makes it much harder to figure out. If someone\u2019s behind the wheel, but not controlling the vehicle, is it the driver\u2019s fault for not noticing what\u2019s happening and taking control? Or is it the car\u2019s fault for not doing its job?
Nobody really knows the answer. Some, like Volvo, have stepped up to take liability for their cars, and insurers believe it\u2019ll be the carmakers who have to take the burden of responsibility. But that will likely fall to politicians and courts, and lawmakers, at least, haven\u2019t weighed in: A 2017 law that passed Congress unanimously only says that drivers might still be on the hook, even if it\u2019s a product failure. And self-driving car companies insist, every time, that it\u2019s not their technology, it\u2019s the nut behind the wheel.
This isn\u2019t new, of course. Auto companies spent decades insisting that it was the driver, not the design of their car, even as car crashes became the number one cause of accidental death in America. Safety features like seat belts and airbags, which we take for granted now, were bitterly fought over every step of the way.<\/p>\n

\n

Similarity rank: 11<\/div>\n

Sentiment rank: -2.1<\/div>\n

<\/div>\n

TW posts: 1<\/div>\n

TW reposts: 0<\/div>\n

TW likes: 0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n