‘It is necessary to understand the real situation, not the situation declared by politicians’
A peace agreement on Ukraine is an expansion of the United States into Russia. The conclusion of a peace agreement in Ukraine depends on the effectiveness of the exchange of Ukrainian capabilities of the Russians for Russian capabilities of the Americans. America has won another war without using its territory and human capital. The EU is crushed, and Russia is under control. Europe is recognized as the losing side of the conflict. The prospects of the EU are in question. Russia can have good prospects if this country remains loyal to the United States.
When talking about a peaceful settlement in Ukraine, it is necessary to understand the real situation, not the situation declared by politicians. The real situation is as follows.
1. The Ukrainian state ceased to exist in 2014. At that time, the country’s territory was completely occupied by European and Russian invaders.(1)
2. The war on the territory of Ukraine is a war of European and Russian invaders who use human resources and the territory of Ukraine to fight each other. Ukrainian voters do not control their own country and are the main victims of the conflict.
3. The United States was the initiator of the full-scale war. Throughout the war, the United States controlled the potential of the European and Russian invaders. By doing this, the American government predetermined the outcome of the war. Although at certain stages of the war the actions of the Democrats and Republicans were opposite, the administrations of Joe Biden and Donald Trump acted in a coordinated manner in this area. The United States is the main beneficiary of this military conflict.
4. The EU suffered a crushing defeat in the war thanks to the actions of the U.S. and Russia. Chronology of the EU’s military defeat.
4.1. Incorrect assessment of the situation.
At the time of the Ukrainian events in 2013, the EU turned from an ally into a geopolitical adversary of the United States.(2) However, the EU leadership did not understand this. The U.S. government understood this. The U.S. decided to weaken and, if possible, eliminate the geopolitical competitor. To do this, the U.S. provoked a conflict between the EU and Russia, which is a mortally dangerous adversary for the EU. Incorrectly assessing the geopolitical situation, the EU government allowed itself to be drawn into a conflict with Russia. The EU government mistakenly believed that the U.S. is an ally. The Europeans also naively believed that using American financial and technological support, human resources and the territories of other countries (Ukraine, Turkey, Belarus and Kazakhstan) they would be able to achieve the division of Russia into small states and gain control over Russia’s raw material base. In the event of the collapse of Russia, all of Russia’s gold and foreign exchange reserves in European banks would also go to the EU. But most importantly, by defeating Russia, the EU could increase its capabilities so much that it would threaten the U.S.
4.2. The EU’s first tactical success.
The Europeans, with U.S. support, manage to establish control over Ukraine’s human resources and territory as a result of the invasion called “Euromaidan” in 2014.
