More voters say they would be better off financially with Trump, but more think Harris has the cognitive health to serve.
With just a week to go, it’s a between Kamala Harris and Donald Trump in — the biggest electoral vote prize of the battleground states in the .
Trump is helped by voters’ negative perceptions of today’s and by the fact that more voters think they would be better off financially with him in the White House than Harris. When they look back, far more Pennsylvania voters say things were going well in the U.S. during Trump’s presidency than say that today.
Harris leads Trump among voters who say the state of democracy and are major factors, and she has an edge on some personal qualities. More think she has the cognitive health to serve as president than think Trump does, and voters are more apt to see Harris’ positions as reasonable and to see Trump’s as extreme.
And while Harris has not convinced most Pennsylvania voters that she would strengthen U.S. democracy (Trump hasn’t either), slightly more think Trump will weaken it.
