“We have the perfect storm for kids to lose coverage.”
This is the web version of VoxCare, a daily newsletter from Vox on the latest twists and turns in America’s health care debate. Like what you’re reading? Sign up to get VoxCare in your inbox here.
This was the worst-case scenario for the Children’s Health Insurance Program.
In mid-September, I spoke with some prominent advocates, and they had two primary fears as the September 30 deadline to extend CHIP’s funding drew closer:
Now both fears have come to pass.
CHIP’s funding expired on October 1, and the program has now gone four weeks without being extended. States are on the clock: The Georgetown University Center for Children and Families reported that six states expect to run out of money by the end of the year or by early January.
They are planning contingencies. Some can keep covering kids through their Medicaid programs, though they will have to find the money to pay their share. Other states could send children to the Affordable Care Act’s marketplaces to buy coverage. But the fear is that some number of young Americans will become uninsured if CHIP is not extended before states run out of funds.
You would think that would motivate Congress to act. But instead, Republicans and Democrats in the House are digging in, feuding over — just as CHIP advocates feared — Obamacare and other programs.
“This is a huge mess,” Bruce Lesley, president of First Focus, told me. “We have the perfect storm for kids to lose coverage.”
The problem is offsets — spending cuts to pay for CHIP’s funding for the next five years. Congress needs to find about $8 billion in savings.
House Republicans proposed cutting Obamacare’s public health fund, cutting the grace period for Obamacare enrollees who fail to make premium payments, repealing the law’s Independent Payment Advisory Board, and making some smaller cuts to Medicare and Medicaid as their plan for offsets.
Democrats balked, as you might expect, and the two sides had agreed to go back into negotiations. A vote in the House would wait, with the hopes that a compromise could be reached.
But on Thursday, according to the Hill, House Republican leaders announced that the chamber would vote on its CHIP bill next week — and it doesn’t sound like there was a bipartisan breakthrough.
“Only yesterday I was told Democrats said they don’t want to do anything and we should just go forward,” House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) said. “That is not the way this place should work.”
So it sure sounds like a partisan bill is coming out of the House, and that’s a huge problem. The CHIP legislation needs 60 votes in the Senate, which will require some Democratic buy-in.
Sens. Orrin Hatch (R-UT) and Ron Wyden (D-OR) had reached their own agreement on extending CHIP, but they never said how they would pay for it. They still haven’t.
Meanwhile, the House is stuck in this offsets battle, apparently at an impasse.
“The March of Dimes is deeply distressed that the House is moving forward on a vote that is likely to result in a partisan vote on CHIP,” Cindy Pellegrini, who oversees federal policy at the March of Dimes, said in an email. “We are urging both parties to continue negotiations with the goal of reaching a bipartisan agreement on this critically important program.”
What’s particularly maddening is the two parties don’t actually disagree about CHIP itself. The fight is over Obamacare and entitlements.
“GIven that CHIP funding is less than one-half of 1 percent of mandatory outlays, they could find bipartisan agreement on the offsets without too much trouble I believe,” Joan Alker at Georgetown told me, adding it was “unfortunate” that the House was moving forward with partisan offsets.
This is exactly what CHIP advocates had feared for the past few months. Now, four weeks after the deadline, there is still no resolution in sight to get this program that covers 9 million of America’s children funded again.
States fall short with medication-assisted treatment for exiting prisoners. The Pew Charitable Trusts has a big new report on health care in US prisons. There is a lot to unpack here, but this stuck out to me: Most states don’t provide medication-assisted treatment for substance abuse for prisoners upon reentry. That is in spite of the evidence that providing the medications helps prevent relapses for individuals leaving prison, Pew said.
On a related note, if you want to understand the opioid emergency that President Trump declared today, Vox’s German Lopez has all the details .
With research help from Caitlin Davis
Today’s top news
Analysis and longer reads
Are you an Obamacare enrollee interested in what happens next? Join our Facebook community for conversation and updates.
