Домой United States USA — Cinema 'Solo' is expected to lose Disney at least $50 million, and become...

'Solo' is expected to lose Disney at least $50 million, and become the first 'Star Wars' movie to lose money

276
0
ПОДЕЛИТЬСЯ

The box-office struggles of «Solo: A Star Wars Story» could result in a loss of at least $50 million for Disney and Lucasfilm, according…
The box-office struggles of «Solo: A Star Wars Story» could result in a loss of at least $50 million for Disney and Lucasfilm, according to The Hollywood Reporter.
«Solo» is reportedly unlikely to gross past $400 million at the global box office against an estimated $250 million production budget and marketing costs that likely doubled its total budget.
B. Riley FBR senior analyst Barton Crockett told THR that «Solo» will lose more than $50 million, while other industry financing sources told the outlet that the loss could exceed $80 million, depending on auxiliary revenues and the undisclosed, exact terms of Disney’s deal for the film.
«Solo» dropped 65% at the box office in its second weekend of release, and its global box office total currently stands at $264.3 million, according to Box Office Mojo .
«Solo» also bombed in its opening weekend in China, as Business Insider’s Jason Guerrasio reported. The film brought in only $10.1 million over Memorial Day weekend in China, a record low for «Star Wars» films in the country, though the franchise itself has historically never grabbed the attention of China, the world’s second-largest movie market.
If it doesn’t see a late surge, as analysts are predicting it won’t, «Solo» will become the first movie from Disney and Lucasfilm to lose money.
2017’s «Star Wars: The Last Jedi» brought in $1.332 billion at the global box office, while the first «Star Wars» spin-off «Rogue One» grossed $1.056 billion in 2016.
The first collaboration from Disney and Lucasfilm, «Star Wars: The Force Awakens,» grossed $2.068 billion in 2015, setting off a renewal of the «Star Wars» series that is now likely to see its first miss in «Solo.»

Continue reading...