Sen. John McCain’s (R., Ariz.) last Senate floor speech came on Nov. 7,2017, when he called for a more comprehensive strategy to address…
Sen. John McCain’s (R., Ariz.) last Senate floor speech came on Nov. 7,2017, when he called for a more comprehensive strategy to address the complexities of the Middle East.
McCain, the Senate Armed Services Committee chairman, and his family announced in a statement Friday he would no longer seek medical treatment for the aggressive brain cancer he’s been fighting since last July.
McCain was the 2008 Republican nominee for president, losing to Barack Obama, and has served in the U. S. Senate representing Arizona since 1986. He spent more than five years as a prisoner of war during the Vietnam War, enduring torture and poor medical treatment that left him permanently unable to lift his arms over his head.
In office, he earned a reputation as being willing to occasionally buck the Republican Party, such as last summer when he cast the deciding vote against a “skinny repeal” of Obamacare. He has been fiercely critical at times of President Donald Trump–who once remarked McCain wasn’t really a war hero because he was captured—and he has been a leading foreign policy voice throughout his career, consistently supporting the idea of engaged American leadership around the globe.
McCain has not come to Washington since December, remaining at home in Arizona with family as he underwent treatment. The New York Times reported that people close to his family say his death is likely imminent.
In his last floor speech, he criticized the Trump administration for lacking clarity on the nation’s role in Middle Eastern affairs and called for answers to key questions on its strategy going forward.
Full text:
“In recent months, United States and coalition forces have achieved major gains against ISIS in Iraq and Syria. Building upon the retaking of Mosul in July, U. S. coalition partners have liberated ISIS’s former capital of Raqqa in Syria, the pocket of Hawija in northern Iraq, and, just days ago, the border town of Al-Qaim in western Iraq. The so-called caliphate that terrorists claimed would overrun the Middle East is now a shadow of its former self—a shrinking swathe on a map once defined by an open reign of terror.
“Unfortunately, however, our challenges in the region remain daunting despite these hard-fought tactical victories. Our relentless focus on destroying ISIS—which is, of course, essential—has obscured a troubling reality: the United States lacks a clear, comprehensive strategy that addresses the Middle East in all of its complexity.
“This is part of the unfortunate legacy that the Obama Administration left for its successor. But nearly one year into the Trump administration, we lack clarity on essential questions about our nation’s role. And we are left to observe the intensifying symptoms of a collapsing regional order as bystanders. While in some cases we are bystanders who take action, we do so with unclear and often unstated objectives.
“The United States has committed to the sale of over a hundred billion dollars of weapons to Saudi Arabia. We have announced an outline of a strategy to counter Iran while providing only minimal detail. We remain conspicuously silent on the future of our role in Iraq and Syria beyond eliminating ISIS—as the Assad regime and its partners consolidate power.
“Our power and influence is diminishing in the Middle East as a result of our lack of direction, and the vacuum has been filled by forces working contrary to American interests. Consider the events that have swept the region in recent months.
“In Iraq, Iranian forces are working to sew discord as we recently saw in Kirkuk, where the presence of Quds Force commander Qassem Soleimani exacerbated tensions among the Kurds and the government in Baghdad. Iranian-backed militias continue to gain power and aim to turn next year’s election into a setback that drives American influence out of Iraq. Meanwhile, the scourge of ISIS remains despite recent military successes. The terrorist attack last week in Manhattan shows its persistent appeal; its rise in the wake of U. S. withdrawal years ago demonstrates the danger of leaving before winning the peace.
“Across the border in Syria, the Assad regime, backed by Russia, Iran, Hezbollah, and an array of militias has retaken most of the country, including many eastern areas that are strategically important. The consequences of the resulting humanitarian crisis have spilled beyond its border for years, destabilizing nations far beyond Syria and paving the way for radicalization. Forces that are hostile to both our interests and our values are shaping the future on the ground while we remain silent, focused on the immediate defeat of ISIS.
“On Saturday, the Lebanese Prime Minister resigned, claiming that he faced death threats from Iran—leaving the United States with one less valuable partner in a divided government in which Hezbollah plays a major role.
“A web of Iranian proxies and allies is spreading from the Levant to the Arabian Peninsula, threatening stability, freedom of navigation and the territory of our partners and allies, including with advanced conventional weapons. Iran itself continues menace its neighbors, use its sanctions relief windfall to harmful ends, test ballistic missiles, and spread weapons throughout the region.
“According to our allies and partners, just days ago Houthi rebels in Yemen launched an Iranian-provided missile at the airport in Riyadh. Meanwhile, our Arab allies are embroiled in infighting and diplomatic disputes that weaken regional cooperation and coalition efforts in the face of these pressing threats.
“Saudi Arabia itself is in the midst of monumental change. The recent appointment of a new crown prince, the arrest over the weekend of a number of prominent Saudi citizens, and the Kingdom’s ongoing war in Yemen—which has spawned a humanitarian crisis of its own—indicate a forcefulness that promises progress but also raises concerns about internal stability and regional conflict. And, ultimately, it could serve to strengthen Saudi rivals.
“In Turkey, President Erdogan continues to consolidate power, abuse human rights and rule of law, and stifle democracy while growing closer to Russia and straining the relationship with NATO.
“Meanwhile, Vladimir Putin’s Russia casts a long shadow throughout the region as it reestablishes itself as a power broker hostile to American interests—and wholly unconcerned about human rights.
“These challenges are daunting, confusing, and complex, borne of years of neglect punctuated by crises and aggravated by weeks filled with the events of decades.
“The questions that a comprehensive strategy must address are formidable:
“And these questions—many of which we require the President and Department of Defense to answer in the National Defense Authorization Act—are not academic.
