„I wanted it to be real… I didn’t want anybody able to say, ‚Oh, this is just made up bull,‘ you know?“
CBS– A political thriller has to convincingly blend both fact and fiction, which is just what a certain debut novelist with plenty of White House experience says he has to offer. He and his writing partner are talking with Mo Rocca:
Here’s something you might expect a former president to do: lead last weekend’s hometown Memorial Day parade, in Chappaqua, N.Y. But Bill Clinton has just done something else you might not expect of an ex-president: “To me it was, first of all, exciting. And because I’d never done it before I told everybody, ‘I’m an old dog, and this is a new trick.’”
That new trick? Writing a political thriller, teaming up with author James Patterson.
Patterson has had a few bestsellers by now. Mr. Clinton joshed, “Yeah, if he keeps working at it, he’s gonna amount to something!”
Actually, Patterson is already the best-selling author in the world, with more than 300 million books sold.
Mr. Clinton said, “I’ve consumed literally thousands and thousands of thrillers, political novels, all this kind of stuff. You know, he’s just good at it. But I wanted it to be real. I want people – I didn’t want anybody able to say, ‘Oh, this is just made up bull,’ you know?”
The result: “The President is Missing” (Little, Brown), in which the president takes on an international terrorist plot, at times single-handedly.
In the audio book, actor Dennis Quaid is the voice of the president:
The president goes rogue, getting in the middle of a shootout at Nationals Park in Washington, and another shootout on the 14th Street Bridge.
“The worst possible attack on the United States happens in this book,” Patterson told Rocca. “And if it happened, this is the way it would happen. There’s a traitor in the White House. If it happened, this is authentically how it would happen. If the president has grapefruit for breakfast in the residency, it would happen something like this!”
Mr. Clinton explained, “We swapped these drafts back and forth. And I’d read something, and I’d say “Well, I don’t think this works, this wouldn’t really happen. But we’ve gotta make something happen and still keep it exciting.’ And it’s, like, how dumb is that, right?”
The terrorists’ weapon is a cyber-attack that could wipe out our entire country’s internet, and with it the systems that control virtually everything – tantamount to an act of war.
Mr. Clinton and Patterson see their story as not just a pager-turner, but as a warning about dangers they say we only got a taste of during the 2016 election.
“We got a real serious problem with the cyber terrorism that could go way beyond fixing the elections,” Mr. Clinton said. “And those problems will happen faster if we allow our elections to continue to be tampered with by others.”
Rocca asked, “Do you think there was any tampering in 2016, with results?”
Patterson said, “You look at our defense budget, and we’ve got this much spent on ‘Let’s stop bombs,’ and this much spent on ‘Let’s deal with cyber terrorism.” And it should be the opposite.”
“Right, because you described the water supply, obviously, financial systems, all these things that are vulnerable, like hospital records.”
“You think about it, I want Americans to be reading this book thinking, “God, let’s see, I’ve got a bank account, I’ve got a savings account, I’ve got a 401(k),” Mr. Clinton said.
The book is written from the point of view of the president.
Rocca said, “I think a lot of people are going to read this book and think, ‘Oh, this is President Bill Clinton!’”
“We didn’t design it to be me,” Mr. Clinton replied. “But he doesn’t say things that I think are false. He says things that I think are true, true to himself, things he believes.”
Still, you can be forgiven for mixing up the two presidents.
The book kicks off with the fictional President Jonathan Lincoln Duncan facing removal from office.
You’d think impeachment would be the last thing William Jefferson Clinton would want to revisit when he reflects on his time in office.
Rocca asked, “Because the fictional president – and it comes up early in the book – is under threat of impeachment, how do you look back at your impeachment?”
“Well, I knew it wouldn’t succeed,” President Clinton said. “It wasn’t a pleasant experience. But it was a fight that I was glad to undertake. They knew there was nothing impeachable. And so, we fought it to the end. And I’m glad.”
It’s been 20 years since President Clinton was impeached, then acquitted by the Senate. But the repercussions reverberate to this day.
In this #MeToo age, some – including members of his own party, like New York Senator Kirsten Gillibrand – have said Mr. Clinton should have stepped down because of the Monica Lewinsky affair.
Rocca asked, “But since we’re talking about that period, what did you think six months ago when Senator Gillibrand said, ‘He should have resigned’?”
“Well, I just disagree with her,” he said. “I mean, you have to really ignore what the context was. But you know, she’s living in a different context. And she did it for different reasons. So, I just disagree with her.”
As for the investigation led by Robert Mueller swirling around the current commander-in-chief, Rocca asked, “Do you think that the press has been fair to President Trump?”
“I think they have tried by and large to cover this investigation based on the facts,” Mr. Clinton said. “I think if the roles were reversed – now, this is me just talking, but it’s based on my experience! – I think if it were a Democratic president, and these facts were present, most people I know in Washington believe impeachment hearings would have begun already.”
“If there were a Democrat in power right now?”
“Yes. And most people I know believe that the press would have been that hard, or harder. But these are serious issues.”
“You hear from Trump supporters who say, ‘You know, the press slobbered all over President Obama, he could do no wrong. And now this guy can do no right. What gives, that there’s a kind of whiplash?’”
“Well, they did treat him differently than other Democrats and Republicans,” Mr. Clinton replied. “That was the political press.”
Why? “You know, I don’t know. They liked him, and they liked having the first African-American president. And he was a good president, I think. I don’t agree with President Trump’s assessment of his service.”
Nor do the authors agree with the current president’s rhetorical style.
Rocca said, “President Trump – this is just factual – is fond of personal insults. I mean, he still refers to Mrs. Clinton as ‘Crooked Hillary’ in tweets.”
Patterson said, “It’s been effective for him. It’s unbelievable that he became president. But he figured some things out. And I think most people do not like these tweets. They just wish it wouldn’t go that way.
