House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, D-California, joins moderator Margaret Brennan to discuss his committee’s investigation into President Trump
In an interview with „Face the Nation“ on Sunday, Democratic Rep. Adam Schiff of California previewed Michael Cohen’s upcoming closed-door testimony before the House Intelligence Committee, which Schiff chairs. At a high-profile public hearing last week, Cohen accused the president of criminal conduct and testified he may have engaged in tax fraud.
Schiff also discussed allegations the president overrode aides to grant his son-in-law and adviser Jared Kushner a permanent security clearance.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Well, Michael Cohen, I know, will be testifying again for your committee this week. What kind of corroborating materials do you expect him to bring to that meeting?
REP. SCHIFF: Well, Mr. Cohen testified in open session, and I can’t go into our closed session interview, but about his false testimony before our committee previously and how that written statement had gone through different drafts or iterations. He testified in open session that others have reviewed that testimony and we have obviously a deep and compelling interest in whether others were knowing of those false statements that he would make to Congress, whether there are any other acts or evidence of obstruction of justice, which is also a core part of our investigation.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Cohen said though in that open testimony he had no direct evidence of collusion with Russia. The Senate Intel chairman also said at this point no evidence of collusion at this point. Have you seen — do you have direct evidence of collusion with Russia?
REP. SCHIFF: Well, I think there is direct evidence in the emails from the Russians through their intermediary offering dirt on Hillary Clinton as part of what is described in writing as the Russian government effort to help elect Donald Trump. They offer that dirt. There is an acceptance of that offer in writing from the president’s son Don Jr. and there is overt acts in furtherance of that. That is the meeting at Trump Tower and all the lies to cover up that meeting at the Trump Tower, and apparently lies that the president participated in.
That to me is direct evidence but there’s also abundant circumstantial evidence.
