Most politicians have been compelled to explain their ideological evolution — or at least have had the decency to lie about it.
So we’ve been through an entire debate, and Kamala Harris still hasn’t explained any of her extraordinary policy flip-flops.
I’m sorry, a person can’t just wake up one morning and abandon their entire worldview without an explanation. I mean, they can try, but no sensible person would take them seriously.
Sure, politicians have been calibrating and triangulating their positions since Pericles.
Most have been compelled to explain their ideological evolution — or have the decency to lie about it.
None have ever relied on an army of anonymous campaign flacks to erase a lifetime of positions.
Well, not until Harris.
We all understand Democrats are desperate to shield voters from their candidate’s mind-numbing tautological rhetoric.
Who can blame them, right?
“Kamala Harris” is an empty vessel to be filled with the aspirations and dreams of gullible partisans.
And allowing her to speak extemporaneously in public would kill all the joy, quickly.
These swirling platitudes and nervous laugh, however, don’t suggest that Harris isn’t bright.
They suggest that she has no genuine philosophical or ethical belief system — other than, perhaps, obtaining and using power.
Indeed, there’s little chance she will coherently expound on her sudden policy U-turns because they make zero ideological sense.
Let’s remember that Harris hasn’t merely been tinkering with the top marginal tax rate in her economic plan: She’s on the record championing, often quite passionately and definitively, a bunch of completely hare-brained extremism.
