Trump Renames Defense Department To ‘Department Of War’—Is It Legal? Here’s What To Know.

0

The White House will install the Department of War as a “secondary name” to get around Trump’s inability to actually rename the agency.
Key Facts
Trump signed an order renaming the Defense agency on Friday, after repeatedly saying publicly that he thinks the name should be reverted to the “Department of War.”
The Defense Department was previously known as the “Department of War” until the 1940s, when the name was changed after World War II and the various departments of the military—the Army, Navy, Marine Corps and Air Force—were all consolidated into a single agency.
That name change was made by Congress, as lawmakers formally rebranded the agency as the Department of Defense in 1949 when they amended the National Security Act.
Because of that, it would take another act of Congress to formally change the name back to the Department of War, and Trump cannot do it unilaterally on his own through an executive order.
Despite Trump’s order on Friday, that means the name change won’t actually be official, with the White House saying in a fact sheet that they intend to make the Department of War name a “secondary title” for the agency.
Trump will also direct Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth to “recommend actions,” including acts of Congress, that would make the name change permanent.What Will Trump’s Executive Order Say?
The executive order will install the Department of War as a “secondary” name for the agency, and also direct Hegseth to now be known under a “secondary title” of the “Secretary of War,” according to a fact sheet the White House provided to Forbes. Though the name change won’t actually be official, Trump will still direct the “Department of War” name and officials’ secondary “war” titles to be used on all external and internal communications throughout the executive branch. The order will also instruct Hegseth to recommend moves that are “required to permanently rename the U.S. Department of Defense to the U.S. Department of War.”Why Did The Name Change To The Department Of Defense?
President George Washington initially established the Department of War back in 1789, though the agency historically only oversaw the Army, while other branches of the military were their own separate agencies. After World War II, Congress and President Harry Truman decided to consolidate the branches of the military into a single agency, citing the need for greater unification and coordination between the agencies as the Cold War began. There was a “recognition” at the time “that the United States is going to continue to have forces deployed on a global level and … that just is going to require a more unified command structure,” Wayne Lee, a military history professor at the University of North Carolina (UNC) told Task & Purpose. The various branches were consolidated into what was known as the “National Military Establishment” with the National Security Act in 1947, and that law was later amended in 1949 to retitle the agency as the Department of Defense. While Trump has suggested the name change was made to be more “politically correct,” UNC military history professor Richard H. Kohn told The New York Times it was more to project an image of peace in the wake of World War II and as the Cold War was beginning. The name change “was to communicate to America’s adversaries and the rest of the world that America was not about making war but defending the United States, and saying that if that requires war, there are four major armed services,” Kohn said. How Much Will The Name Change Cost?
It’s still unclear how much the change to “Department of War” will cost the federal government—given the cost of changing signage, official documentation and other assets—but it will likely be millions of dollars. A 2022 report by the Naming Commission to Congress found that efforts by the Department of Defense to change the names of all military assets that honor Confederate leaders, which would be less widespread than this initiative, would cost an estimated $62.5 million.Crucial Quote
“If we call it the Dept. of War, we’d better equip the military to actually prevent and win wars,” Sen. Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., said in a tweet. “Can’t preserve American primacy if we’re unwilling to spend substantially more on our military than Carter or Biden. ‘Peace through strength’ requires investment, not just rebranding.” Chief Critic
Democrats have been heavily critical of Trump’s decision to rename the Department of Defense, decrying the emphasis on “war” and casting the name change as a performative and costly move Trump is undertaking rather than actually investing in the nation’s troops. “Why not put this money toward supporting military families or toward employing diplomats that help prevent conflicts from starting in the first place?” Sen. Tammy Duckworth, D-Ill., a military veteran, told Reuters. “Because Trump would rather use our military to score political points than to strengthen our national security and support our brave servicemembers and their families—that’s why.”Key Background
Trump’s executive order comes after he and his administration had repeatedly teased that they wanted to restore the military agency’s previous name. “We want to be defensive, but we want to be offensive, too, if we have to be,” Trump said last week about the name change, calling the Department of Defense name “too defensive” and claiming the U.S. had an “unbelievable history of victory” under its old moniker. The president also referred to Hegseth as the “Secretary of War” on Truth Social in July and claimed in June that the post-World War II change was made because “we became politically correct.” Hegseth has also argued the Department of War title projects more strength, telling Fox News last week, “We won World War I, and we won World War II, not with the Department of Defense, but with a War Department, with the Department of War.” The order marks the latest controversial name change by the president since he took office, with Trump also rebranding the Gulf of Mexico as the “Gulf of America.”

iPhone 17 Pro design revamp goes beyond camera bar, leaked pictures show

0

Someone who works at an accessories company has revealed the changes coming to the iPhone 17 Pro’s front.
The iPhone 17 Pro may have a 25 percent smaller Dynamic Island. | Image Credit – @that_one_g3 on X
An iPhone 17 Pro rumor that first emerged last year but wore off recently has popped up again. A person who works at a company that makes iPhone screen protectors says that the Dynamic Island is shrinking after all.
Since its debut in 2022, the Dynamic Island hasn’t changed at all. The Dynamic Island is a pill-shaped cutout that replaced the notch. It’s more than a static physical cutout, though, and acts as an interactive, shape-shifting interface.
With Apple still not any closer to putting Face ID under the screen, the most it can do it to increase the usable screen area is make the Dynamic Island smaller. And according to X user @that_one_g3, it’s going to do just that this year.
First spotted by MacRumors, the X user has shared intel from their workplace, revealing that the iPhone 17 Pro and Pro Max will have a Dynamic Island that’s 1.5cm in width, down from 2cm on the current models.
In the accompanying photos, the black cutout does look smaller, though that may not be apparent at first glance, considering it has only been reduced by 25 percent in size.
Early-stage iPhone 17 Pro rumors claimed that Apple would use metalens for the Face ID system to trim down the Dynamic Island. These flat and light optical lenses take up less space than traditional lenses.
Later leaks hinted that the size of the Dynamic Island would remain unchanged this year and that the only change to expect for the iPhone 17 series was a revamped interface for the Dynamic Island to make it a centrepiece of the user experience.
The rumor is back on just in time to intensify the excitement for the September 9 “Awe Dropping” event where Apple will announce the iPhone 17 family.
The iPhone 17 Pro is pretty much confirmed to have an edge-to-edge camera bar. This, paired with a smaller Dynamic Island and potentially slimmer bezels, will make the handset look visibly different from the iPhone 16 Pro.
With Apple unlikely to announce any groundbreaking AI changes this year, an upgraded design could steer the conversation into a new direction, acting as a saving grace for the company.
Rediscover some of the most unique and memorable phones of the last two decades! “Iconic Phones” is a beautifully illustrated book that we’ve been working on for over a year – and it’s coming out in just a couple short month!
“Iconic Phones: Revolution at Your Fingertips” is a must-have coffee table book for every phone lover out there. Covering the stories of more than 20 fan-favorite phones, it takes you on a memorable journey through the technological revolution that shaped our lives. Sign up now to secure an early discount price!

Sky suspend Angel Reese for first half of Aces game

0

The team issued a statement saying her comments in a recent interview were “detrimental” to the team.
The Sky have suspended Angel Reese for the first half of their upcoming game against the Aces.
“Because of statements detrimental to the team made by Angel Reese during league-mandated media, she will not play in the first half of the game on September 7 against the Aces,” the team said in a statement.
Marsh called it a “top down” organizational decision and declined to share which of Reese’s comments were viewed as detrimental.
In a recent interview with Chicago Tribune, Reese voiced many concerns. She said she was not settling for another season like this one and called for various roster upgrades. She also questioned whether the Sky could attract top free agents and raised the possibility of leaving if things didn’t “pan out.”
The comments caught Marsh and her teammates off guard; they said she had not shared those concerns with them directly. The team organized a players’ only meeting on Wednesday to address it, and Reese apologized. She said she didn’t intend to put down her teammates and “had to be better” in the future.
Reese was also suspended for Friday’s game against the Fever after she received her eighth technical foul of the season on Wednesday.

Christian McCaffrey ‘plans to play’ despite missing 49ers practice with calf injury

0

Christian McCaffrey’s status for Week 1 just got a little shakier. The star 49ers running back didn’t practice on Friday due to a calf injury, according to ESPN’s Adam Schefter.
Christian McCaffrey’s status for Week 1 just got a little shakier.
The star 49ers running back didn’t practice on Friday due to a calf injury, according to ESPN’s Adam Schefter.
McCaffrey told reporters after practice that the injury was “nothing serious” and that he “plans to play” on Sunday.
“I feel great about where I’m at,” McCaffrey said. “Unfortunately, when you have the injury history that I have, sometimes when you don’t practice things get blown out of proportion.”
He’s listed as questionable for Sunday’s game against the Seahawks in Seattle.
The news comes one day after McCaffrey suddenly popped up on San Francisco’s injury report.
McCaffrey had been a full participant in 49ers practice as recently as Wednesday before being a limited participant on Thursday.
The three-time Pro Bowler played in just four games last season thanks to an Achilles injury.
McCaffrey appeared to be healthy coming into this season, with 49ers head coach Kyle Shanahan even saying in August that he was looking like his old self during training camp.
“Yeah. I think he hit like 25 [mph] yesterday or something like that. I’m just making that up,” Shanahan told reporters when asked if McCaffrey was looking like his did two years ago when he won the Offensive Player of the Year award.
“Trying to make Christian happy. He’s doing awesome. He’s as fast as he’s been. He’s quick. He’s strong. He’s Christian McCaffrey.”
As recently as Wednesday, Shanahan suggested that McCaffrey was healthy and ready to go for the season.
“I knew Christian was back just once he told me he was healthy,” Shanahan said when asked when he knew McCaffrey was back, per ESPN. “It’s not like we were thinking he wouldn’t come back from it. You know, you hope that stuff, the arthritis and everything, goes away. Which it usually does. He was telling us that early in the offseason, so I felt pretty good about it. Christian’s not a liar. So, I didn’t think he was.
“Then we saw him early in OTAs, he looked like the guy we’ve always known and he’s continued that.”
If McCaffrey can’t go, the 49ers are expected to turn to running back Brian Robinson Jr., who was acquired from the Commanders in August.

Rosie O'Donnell Issues Scathing Rebuke After Donald Trump's Latest Threats

0

“The time is up and he knows it,” O’Donnell said. “He’s like a cornered rat and he doesn’t know where to go or what to do.”
Comedian and actress Rosie O’Donnell responded to President Donald Trump’s threats to take away her U.S. citizenship by calling him a “cornered rat” who cannot escape the allegations of being named in the Jeffrey Epstein files.Why It Matters
In a post to Truth Social on Wednesday, Trump wrote: “We are giving serious thought to taking away Rosie O’Donnell’s Citizenship”, adding that she is “not a Great American.” The post echoed previous remarks from Trump, who in July wrote on social media that he was giving “serious consideration” to revoking her citizenship, saying that she was “not in the best interests of our great country.”
Trump also mentioned her by name to Irish prime minister, Micheál Martin, when he visited the Oval Office in March.
Trump and O’Donnell have been involved in a feud for nearly two decades, which began in 2006 when the former co-host of The View questioned Trump’s moral character during his tenure as owner of the Miss USA pageant. Trump fired back almost a decade later, invoking her name during a 2015 presidential debate when asked why he calls women he dislikes “fat pigs, dogs, slobs and disgusting animals”, drawing applause and laughter from the debate crowd.What To Know
O’Donnell appeared on ex-CNN anchor and journalist Jim Acosta’s podcast on Thursday, asked whether she was aware of Trump’s newest threats sent in her direction.
The actress, who said she heard about the threat from a friend in Los Angeles, moved to Ireland in January with her youngest child, Dakota, after Trump was reelected.
“It’s the Epstein files, it’s the testifying of the survivors that he tried to cover up with the planes, with the flyover”, O’Donnell told Acosta. “It’s unbelievable how obvious he is about everything that he does. Could you say, ‘I’m guilty without saying I’m guilty’, more than having a flyover during their press conference?
“The time is up and he knows it. He’s like a cornered rat and he doesn’t know where to go or what to do. So, he goes into his bag of tricks, and one of his bag of tricks is, let’s make fun of Rosie O’Donnell and threaten her—even though he’s threatened me before but never done anything.”
She said that he’s threatened to sue her “for 20-something years”, and also threatened to take her wife away when she was married.
“He is deranged and I believe he’s suffering from dementia and other very serious medical complications. . I think there is a line in the sand with people raping children. This is a sex trafficking international cover-up, and he’s in the middle of it.”
During Trump’s last threat in July to pull her citizenship, O’Donnell also brought up his relationship to Epstein by posting a picture of the pair with a caption: “Hey Donald, you’re rattled again? 18 years later and I still live rent-free in that collapsing brain of yours.”What People Are Saying
O’Donnell also used her social platform to respond to Trump, whose Truth Social post included a digitally altered image of O’Donnell that shows a stretched out face.
“Banishing me again? Logan Roy would be proud”, O’Donnell said on Instagram, referencing Brian Cox’s character in the HBO program Succession.
“EPSTEIN SURVIVORS are the reckoning and your gold lamé throne is melting”, she added.What’s Next
Trump does not have the legal authority to revoke citizenship of someone born in the U.S., unless in cases of fraud. The 1967 Supreme Court decision in Afroyim v. Rusk ruled that the U.S. government cannot revoke an individual’s citizenship without their consent.

10 Indie Genre Films We’re Excited for This Fall

0

Anyone can pick out the new ‘Avatar,’ ‘Predator,’ or ‘Tron’ movies, but is there anything else coming this fall?
You’d be hard-pressed to be a movie fan if you didn’t find a big Hollywood release to be excited about this fall. Maybe it’s the return of the Avatar, Predator, or Tron franchises. Maybe it’s a new film from an iconic filmmaker like Edgar Wright, Guillermo del Toro, or Yorgos Lanthimos. Or, maybe you can’t wait to be scared by new films in the Conjuring, Black Phone, or Five Nights at Freddy’s franchises. Whatever the case, as usual, Hollywood tries to have something for everyone. But there’s always more.
Below, we’ve got 10 genre films that aren’t from major studios and often don’t have big-name stars, but we’re still excited to see them. There’s some horror, there’s some romance, there’s some animation, and more. But all could potentially be flying under your radar.Rabbit Trap (September 12)
Dev Patel stars in this Sundance film about a couple who move to the woods only to discover a mysterious, otherworldly sound.Night of the Reaper (September 19 on Shudder)
We love a good period slasher film, and Night of the Reaper, about a babysitter haunted by the titular slasher, sounds like it’s going to deliver exactly that. Xeno (September 19)
Kevin Hart produced, but doesn’t star in, this story of a young girl and a mysterious creature who go off on an adventure.Good Boy (October 3)
An adorable dog witnesses his owner encounter an escalating series of paranormal activities. No, not the movies.V/H/S/Halloween (October 3 on Shudder)
In what’s basically become an annual tradition, the VHS franchise is back with another series of spooky anthologies, all themed around everyone’s favorite holiday.Shelby Oaks (October 3)
A woman believes a new discovery may be the key to finding her long-lost sister and the demon potentially behind it all.Deathstalker (October 10)
The latest film from director Steven Kostanski (The Void, PG: Psycho Goreman) is an epic fantasy horror adventure. Just the way we like them.Queens of the Dead (October 24)
Katy O’Brian stars in this neon-infused horror comedy about what happens when a group of people in a club realizes a zombie apocalypse is happening outside.Eternity (November 26)
The Scarlet Witch, aka Elizabeth Olsen, returns. Only this time, she’s dead. And in the afterlife, she has to choose between her two husbands.Scarlet (December)
A new anime from director Mamoru Hosoda, Scarlet follows a sword-fighting princess on an adventure through the afterlife. Originally set for wide release this year, it was recently pushed into next year, but it will get a small, awards-qualifying run sometime in December.

Hunderte Festnahmen auf Hyundai-Werkgelände in den USA –was Trump damit zu tun hat

0

Auf einem Werksgelände des südkoreanischen Autobauers Hyundai in den USA kommt es zu Hunderten Festnahmen. Der Fall sorgt für Aufsehen.
Von dpa | 05.09.2025, 19:15 Uhr
| Update vor 30 Min.Artikel zur Merkliste hinzufügen

Sie möchten weiterlesen?
Wählen Sie eine Option:
Sie sind bereits Digitalabonnent? Anmelden

Monatsabo
Neue Osnabrücker Zeitung Plus Logo Round Plus Logo Round
Alle Artikel & Inhalte auf NOZ.de
News-App inkl. Push-Funktion
99 Cent im ersten Monat, alle Vorteile nutzen Probemonat für 99 Cent
Monatlich kündbar

Jahresabo (30 % sparen!)
Neue Osnabrücker Zeitung Plus Logo Round Plus Logo Round
Alle Artikel & Inhalte auf NOZ.de
News-App inkl. Push-Funktion
14,95 € 9,95 € pro Monat Jetzt Angebot sichern
12 Monate zum Vorteilspreis
Monatsabo
Neue Osnabrücker Zeitung Plus Logo Round Plus Logo Round
Zur Startseite
SucheSuche

Skandal w Paryżu. Bohaterem polski duchowny

0

​Skandal w Paryżu. Bohaterem polski duchowny – RMF24.pl – Kilkanaście osób zwróciło się do francuskiej Niezależnej Instancji Krajowej ds. Uznania i Zadośćuczynienia (INIRR) o rekompensatę w związku z nadużyciami seksualnymi ze strony polskiego duchownego.
“(.) bliski przyjaciel papieża Jana Pawła II, przez dziesięciolecia dopuszczał się napaści seksualnych na studentach Niższego Seminarium Polskiego w Paryżu, którym się opiekował. Trzynastu z nich domaga się sprawiedliwości od władz religijnych, które obwiniają się nawzajem. Ksiądz, który obecnie mieszka w Yonne, przyznał się do winy” – w ten sposób zaczyna się artykuł w “Le Parsien”. W pierwszym zadaniu pada nazwisko polskiego duchownego.”Le Parisien” podał, że . Placówka ta została zamknięta w 1988 roku.Wyjaśnijmy: INIRR to instytucja powołana przez francuski Kościół, by zadośćuczynić ofiarom pedofilii.AFP, która nie wymienia nazwiska duchownego, podaje informację , które zwróciły się do INIRR, powołując się na przewodniczącą tej instancji, Marie Derain de Vaucresson. Poinformowała ona, że Wszystkie te osoby w czasie opisywanych wydarzeń były niepełnoletnie.Jak powiedziała Derain, INIRR musi wyjaśnić, czy “seminarium i księża, którzy tam przebywali w ramach polskiej misji w Paryżu, podlegali Kościołowi francuskiemu”.O oskarżeniach byłych uczniów seminarium w Paryżu wobec księdza informował w lipcu br. dziennik “Polityka”.”Jego uczniowie, dziś dorośli mężczyźni z pięciu różnych krajów, w tym także z Polski, w czerwcu 2025 r. złożyli zeznania przed Państwową Komisją ds. Przeciwdziałania Wykorzystaniu Seksualnemu Małoletnich. Nie mogli już dłużej milczeć. Sam ksiądz, mimo zaawansowanego wieku, jest ciągle proboszczem w podparyskiej parafii” – pisał tygodnik w tekście zatytułowanym “Grzechy księdza prałata. Gwałcił, łamał, odurzał. Skrzywdzeni nie chcą dłużej milczeć”.

タイ新首相に保守派アヌティン氏 少数与党、早期解散が焦点―タクシン氏に海外逃亡説

0

【バンコク時事】タイの下院(定数500、欠員8)は5日、首相選出投票を行い、保守派の野党「タイの誇り党」のアヌティン党首(58)が過半数を獲得して新首相に選出された。新政権は少数与党となる見通しで、アヌティン氏を支持した革新系の最大野党「国民党」が求める早期解散を実施するかが焦点となる。
タイの下院(定数500、欠員8)は5日、首相選出投票を行い、保守派の野党「タイの誇り党」のアヌティン党首(58)が過半数を獲得して新首相に選出された。新政権は少数与党となる見通しで、アヌティン氏を支持した革新系の最大野党「国民党」が求める早期解散を実施するかが焦点となる。
2023年から政権を率いたタクシン元首相派「タイ貢献党」は野党となる見込み。タクシン氏は4日にタイを出国し、アラブ首長国連邦(UAE)のドバイに到着した。政治的影響力が低下し、実刑判決後の仮病入院疑惑に関する9日の最高裁判所の判決次第では収監の可能性がある中で、海外逃亡を図ったという見方がある。タクシン氏は「8日までに帰国する」と主張した。

Anthropic Agrees to $1.5 Billion Settlement for Downloading Pirated Books to Train AI

0

Authors sued after it was revealed Anthropic downloaded the books from Library Genesis.
Anthropic has agreed to pay $1.5 billion to settle a lawsuit brought by authors and publishers over its use of millions of copyrighted books to train the models for its AI chatbot Claude, according to a legal filing posted online.
A federal judge found in June that Anthropic’s use of 7 million pirated books was protected under fair use but that holding the digital works in a “central library” violated copyright law. The judge ruled that executives at the company knew they were downloading pirated works, and a trial was scheduled for December.
The settlement, which was presented to a federal judge on Friday, still needs final approval but would pay $3,000 per book to hundreds of thousands of authors, according to the New York Times. The $1.5 billion settlement would be the largest payout in the history of U.S. copyright law, though the amount paid per work has often been higher. For example, in 2012, a woman in Minnesota paid about $9,000 per song downloaded, a figure brought down after she was initially ordered to pay over $60,000 per song.
In a statement to Gizmodo on Friday, Anthropic touted the earlier ruling from June that it was engaging in fair use by training models with millions of books.
“In June, the District Court issued a landmark ruling on AI development and copyright law, finding that Anthropic’s approach to training AI models constitutes fair use,” Aparna Sridhar, deputy general counsel at Anthropic, said in a statement by email.
“Today’s settlement, if approved, will resolve the plaintiffs’ remaining legacy claims. We remain committed to developing safe AI systems that help people and organizations extend their capabilities, advance scientific discovery, and solve complex problems,” Sridhar continued.
According to the legal filing, Anthropic says the payments will go out in four tranches tied to court-approved milestones. The first payment would be $300 million within five days after the court’s preliminary approval of the settlement, and another $300 million within five days of the final approval order. Then $450 million would be due, with interest, within 12 months of the preliminary order. And finally $450 million within the year after that.
Anthropic, which was recently valued at $183 billion, is still facing lawsuits from companies like Reddit, which struck a deal in early 2024 to let Google train its AI models on the platform’s content. And authors still have active lawsuits against the other big tech firms like OpenAI, Microsoft, and Meta.
The ruling from June explained that Anthropic’s training of AI models with copyrighted books would be considered fair use under U.S. copyright law because theoretically someone could read “all the modern-day classics” and emulate them, which would be protected:
…not reproduced to the public a given work’s creative elements, nor even one author’s identifiable expressive style…Yes, Claude has outputted grammar, composition, and style that the underlying LLM distilled from thousands of works. But if someone were to read all the modern-day classics because of their exceptional expression, memorize them, and then emulate a blend of their best writing, would that violate the Copyright Act? Of course not.
“Like any reader aspiring to be a writer, Anthropic’s LLMs trained upon works not to race ahead and replicate or supplant them—but to turn a hard corner and create something different,” the ruling said.
Under this legal theory, all the company needed to do was buy every book it pirated to lawfully train its models, something that certainly costs less than $3,000 per book. But as the New York Times notes, this settlement won’t set any legal precedent that could determine future cases because it isn’t going to trial.

Timeline words data