Home Blog Page 84073

После нацистского приветствия закрыли музыкальную программу

0

NewsHubЛитовский государственный телеканал LRT закрыл программу “Угадай мелодию” после того, как в прямом эфире одна из участниц продемонстрировала нацистское приветствие.
Об этом заявил заместитель генерального директора “LRT” Римвидас Палецкис.
Палецкис заявил, что был шокирован, когда увидел этот эпизод передачи.
“Это остро контрастирует с ценностями, которые продвигает LRT”, – сказал гендиректор.
ЧИТАЙТЕ ТАКЖЕ: Герман вышла на экран с новым имиджем
Он принес извинения телезрителям, добавив, что канал закрыл передачу.
Напомним, “Народный фронт” заявляет о поддержке канала “1+1”.

Similarity rank: 3.2

© Source: http://gazeta.ua/ru/articles/world-life/_posle-nacistskogo-privetstviya-zakryli-muzykalnuyu-programmu/745128
All rights are reserved and belongs to a source media.

В Одесской области намело сугробы в человеческий рост

0

NewsHubВ Одесской области в субботу, 7 января, по состоянию на 19.00 принято решение прекратить движение по всем трассам и дорогам до 9 утра 8 января.
Как сообщил у себя в Facebook заместитель председателя Одесского областного совета Юрий Димчогло, движение будет открыто лишь на трассе Одесса – Киев. В остальных направлениях дороги не расчищены.
Заносы в некоторых случаях составляют более двух метров. Трасса Одесса – Рени полностью заблокирована на отрезке Спасское – перекресток на Холмское (около 15 км).
С вечера из-за усиления ветра появились большие заносы на трассе Одесса- Кучурганы (на Кишинев), а также в сторону городов Раздельная и Подольск.
Как сообщал Корреспондент.net, в результате снегопадов закрыты трассы в шести областях Украины.

Similarity rank: 7.6

© Source: http://korrespondent.net/city/odessa/3797814-v-odesskoi-oblasty-namelo-suhroby-v-chelovecheskyi-rost
All rights are reserved and belongs to a source media.

СМИ: Флоридскому стрелку грозит смертная казнь

0

NewsHubПрокуратура американского города Майами (штат Флорида) предъявила в субботу обвинения Эстебану Сантьяго, которого власти США подозревают в стрельбе в аэропорту в Форт-Лодердейле., сообщает агентство Associated Press (AP).
Согласно сообщению, мужчине, если он будет признан виновным, может грозить тюремное заключение вплоть до пожизненного, либо смертная казнь.
Сантьяго отказано в возможности выйти под залог. Как ожидается, он предстанет перед судом 9 января.
Напомним, Эстебан Сантьяго – бывший военнослужащий, он участвовал в военных операциях США в Ираке и в последнее время жил в городе Анкоридж (штат Аляска).
По данным СМИ, мужчина прибыл во Флориду на самолете и провез оружие в багаже.
При стрельбе в Форт-Лодердейле были убиты пять человек, восемь получили ранения. После инцидента Сантьяго был арестован.

Similarity rank: 7.7

© Source: http://nv.ua/world/countries/smi-floridskomu-strelku-grozit-smertnaja-kazn-436929.html
All rights are reserved and belongs to a source media.

Керри раскритиковал Трампа за посты в Twitter

0

NewsHubГоссекретарь США Джон Керри заявил, что не считает электронную страничку в Twitter избранного президента Дональда Трампа хорошим способом коммуникации по международным политическим вопросам.
“Я не делаю заявления касательно международной политики в Twitter. Не думаю, что 140 символов позволяют вам адекватно справляться со сложными выборами, которые мы предпринимаем”, – сказал он, отвечая на вопрос ведущего телеканала ABC News по поводу сообщений в соцсети избранного президента Дональда Трампа по таким международным темам, как Россия и Тайвань.
Керри выразил надежду, что власти США изберут другой тип коммуникации. “Однако это зависит от новой администрации”, – подчеркнул он.

Similarity rank: 10

© Source: http://korrespondent.net/world/3797845-kerry-raskrytykoval-trampa-za-posty-v-Twitter
All rights are reserved and belongs to a source media.

Four predictions for politics in 2017 Want to really shift the pounds in January? Get drinking water

0

NewsHubJeremy Corbyn will remain as leader
Jeremy Corbyn started the year in a position that was stronger than it appeared, something the doomed attempt to remove him proved.
Now he looks unassailable, which probably slightly overstates his strength.
Party members are worried by what they see as the party’s right-turn on immigration, and those worries will grow more acute if the pattern of Richmond and Sleaford – where the party suffered an exodus of Leave-backing voters to the right and of Remain-backing voters to the Liberal Democrats – continues in by-elections and elections next year. There is also growing concern about what is seen as the Labour leadership’s frequent silence and inability to make news.
Neither of these worries will cohere into viable opposition to Corbyn, however. It’s easy to imagine a candidate who could displace Corbyn: pro-European, pro-immigration and popular in the country at large. But there lies the problem: no such candidate exists in the parliamentary Labour party. The leadership is Corbyn’s as long as he wants it.
If there is an early election, it won’t be at a time of Theresa May’s choosing
Next year will continue to be marked by questions of an early election. One reason being that the government has been forced to abandon or delay key planks of its agenda already, thanks to its wafer-thin majority – but is also in possession of a double-digit lead in the opinion polls.
An obstacle to such analyses is the Fixed-Term Parliaments Act, which means that the Prime Minister cannot secure an early election without either a two-thirds majority in the Commons or her government losing a vote of confidence. At that point, if a new government cannot secure a vote of confidence in itself, there is an election.
Theoretically, the government could put forward a motion of confidence and instruct its MPs to abstain and, seeing as it is unlikely that the opposition parties would declare their confidence in May’s leadership, secure an early election that way.
There are some problems with that approach though – as the Institute for Government’s Cath Haddon explains , it’s not at all clear who the Prime Minister would be in the intervening 14 days – would it still be Theresa May? Someone else from within her party? Or Jeremy Corbyn?
All of those ambiguities mean that I think it is highly unlikely that May will call an early election out of choice. But the same arguments for calling one at a time of her choosing are all the arguments that may force her hand. So while I don’t rule out an election next year, if there is one, it will be as much of a shock to May as to everyone else.
Angela Merkel will continue as Chancellor, but her power will be diminished
Angela Merkel’s standing in Britain is odd. In regular times, she’d be seen as a fairly dull centre-right politician. But the leftwing achievements of the SPD, her coalition partner from 2005 to 2009 and again from 2013, mean that she is seen as cuddlier than she is, while her decision to allow a million refugees into Germany has made her a hate figure on the uglier parts of the right.
That means her success in the German elections next year has become a proxy war among Britain’s elites, with the success of the far-right party Alternative for Germany (AfD) a subject for celebration among Britain’s own nativists.
The reality, as I’ve written before, is that what will decide Merkel’s future is how well the parties of the left – the Social Democrats, the leftist Die Linke and the Greens – do. If they can cobble together a working coalition, they will likely force her out. Far more likely – unless Martin Schulz can give the Social Democrats an unexpected boost – is a more fractious repeat of the coalition of left and right that she has run since 2013.
Barring a terrorist attack, Marine Le Pen won’t win
We’ve known since early 2013 that Marine Le Pen, the fascist candidate for the French presidency, had a strong chance of winning the first round of the presidential elections and a puncher’s chance of winning the second. (Under the rules of the French system, unless a candidate secures more than half of the vote in the first round, the top two go through to the run-off.)
But the victories for Donald Trump and Brexit – plus the fact that, as far as Britain’s Brexit deal is concerned, elections on the continent matter to the United Kingdom more than ever – mean that here in Britain, people are waking up to the possibility that Le Pen could be France’s next president.
I’m not convinced that she will. For all the far right is gaining from sharing best practice between its activists, it is losing through the association with extremists abroad. Most of the four million people who voted for Ukip detest Donald Trump, and that goes even more so for the perhaps three to four million voters who didn’t vote Ukip in 2015 but could potentially be persuaded to do so in the future. Don’t forget that allies of Norbert Hofer, the far-right candidate in Austria, believe the association with the anti-EU politics of Nigel Farage hurt their candidate.
The comparison between Le Pen and her cheerleaders abroad risks hurting her. But more important than that is that the victories of Trump and Brexit – and I should emphasise that the differences between Brexit and Trump are more important than the similarities, in my view – both ran with the grain of their respective political cultures. In the case of Vote Leave, euroscepticism is part of the warp and weft of British politics, just as white reactionary politics are part of the story of American politics.
It’s worth noting that while the Brexit vote, Trump’s victory and Matteo Renzi’s defeat in the Italian referendum were cheered by Le Pen, they were all the work of forces that were to her left. One of Vote Leave’s successes was largely in keeping Nigel Farage away from the cameras, Trump hijacked the party of the centre-right (albeit in the disturbingly right-wing context of American politics), and Renzi’s defeat was an alliance of much of the political spectrum against his government and him personally.
Le Pen’s assault on the French presidency has two problems. First, she has not hijacked a centre-right organisation, and she is pushing against, rather than towards, the cultural headwinds of French politics. There is a long tradition of voting against the anti-system parties in French politics, and my expectation is that the left and the centre will lend their votes to keep Le Pen out again in 2017.
If you’ve been struggling to come up with a suitable New Year resolution, may I suggest a determined plan to drink more? That might sound superficially attractive (depending on what kind of New Year you had) but I should make clear from the outset that it’s water, not alcohol, that I have in mind.
Ensuring adequate hydration has certain benefits, medically speaking. A good fluid throughput reduces the chance of urinary tract infection, and helps prevent attacks of gout and kidney stone formation in people prone to these conditions. If we’re short of water, the bowel will reabsorb every last drop from what doctors euphemistically term the “stool”, which can lead to constipation. And our kidneys function best when there is plenty of water around – they respond to dehydration by concentrating urine to conserve body water, but in doing so they can sustain damage through metabolic stress.
Aside from these medical aspects, there may be softer benefits. As the body starts to dehydrate, water within cells is drawn out into the circulation. The resultant cellular water loss can affect function in a variety of tissues. Athletes’ fluid balance has been the subject of extensive research, and even mild levels of dehydration measurably reduce physical performance. Studies of brain function have shown conflicting results, but overall it appears that mild to moderate dehydration impairs concentration and the ability to think through complex tasks. Headache is a common symptom of water depletion and, although it’s not a miracle cure, studies show that the severity and duration of headaches can be reduced by optimising hydration. So frequent swigs from a bottle of water may help ensure we’re in top condition to tackle our day.
Beyond this, water is a critical ally in the fight against the modern plague of obesity. Quenching our thirst with pretty much any other drink freights in energy along with the H2O, adding to our overall calorie load. There is also some suggestion that we readily confuse thirst for hunger. This might sound daft, but both sensations are mediated by the same region of the brain, and our highly adaptable brains rapidly forge associations between behaviours and the biological drives that they satisfy. All foodstuffs contain water, so it has always been possible to ease thirst by eating; but many of the fluids we consume nowadays are highly calorific, so we often sate our hunger by drinking. As a consequence of these crossed wires, we may be taking substantial excess energy into our bodies when all we’re after is some H2O. Anyone wanting to tackle an expanding waistline should respond to apparent hunger pangs with a good drink of water. If twenty minutes later you no longer crave food, then what you were experiencing was thirst.
As we age, our sense of thirst diminishes, and many elderly people completely lose the cues that ordinarily prompt fluid intake. Of itself, this increases susceptibility to urinary tract infection, but dehydration is also a frequent and severe complication of otherwise minor illnesses such as flu or gastroenteritis in this age group. The rapid downward spiral of low blood pressure, kidney failure and mental confusion frequently leads to hospital admission, or even death. We assume that if someone isn’t thirsty then they’re not short of fluids, but the most important advice I give elderly patients is to ensure that they drink regularly, even if they don’t feel like it.
If you are interested in increasing your own daily water intake, get yourself a bottle to refill from the tap, rather than adding to the mountain of plastic waste we produce. How much to drink varies according to individual circumstances, but two litres over 24 hours should be fine – three at a push. The best gauge is your urine colour: pale straw is what you’re looking for. Darker suggests you should drink more, but if you’re constantly peeing stuff that’s as clear as Evian then you’re overdoing it. And with that, I wish you a happy, hydrated new year.

Similarity rank: 0.5
Sentiment rank: 0

© Source: http://www.newstatesman.com/politics/elections/2016/12/four-predictions-politics-2017
All rights are reserved and belongs to a source media.

White House Addresses Obama's Record Democratic Losses

0

NewsHubDespite a record loss of offices for the Democratic Party during his eight-year presidency, Barack Obama believes that the problem is not the party’s values or policy prescriptions but the inability to “make the argument.”
That’s what his top spokesman told Newsmax Friday in response to our question about the numerous news stories pointing out that Democrats lost 1,030 offices — U. S. Senate and House seats, governorships, and state legislative offices — during the Obama presidency.
Noting that several reports conclude that this is the largest loss of offices for a party while it held the White House in modern history, we asked how the President felt about it.
“I think it’s always important to evaluate the context of those numbers,” replied White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest, “and one important piece of context is simply that there was an historic wave that entered office at the end of 2008 and the beginning of 2009 of Democratic elected officials who benefitted from President Obama being at the top of the ballot in 2008.
“So when we’re talking about those kinds of numbers, it’s important to recognize that those numbers got built up in the first place because of President Obama’s political success in winning the White House the first time.”
But Earnest also admitted that the President “has been disappointed, particularly with regard to this most recent election that a lot of good Democratic elected officials, public servants didn’t succeed at the ballot box.”
As Obama sees it, according to Earnest, there is a need for Democrats “to express their view persuasively in communities all across the country, and that certainly is part of the challenge that President Obama is going to spend some time thinking about as a former President.”
We’ve got the values right, we’ve got the policy prescriptions right, but we just need to go and make the argument. And the President is confident that if and when Democrats do that, there are important gains for the party and for the country that lie ahead.”

Similarity rank: 1.1
Sentiment rank: -1.9

© Source: http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/white-house-obama-offices-democratic-party/2017/01/07/id/767346
All rights are reserved and belongs to a source media.

Automotive innovations at CES 2017

0

NewsHubThis week Fox 13 car-guy Brian Champagne takes a look at the high-tech concepts on display at the 2017 Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas. Check out the video above for a peek at some of the latest features being developed, including a vehicle that could make you money when you’re not using it.

Similarity rank: 3.3
Sentiment rank: 2.3

© Source: http://fox13now.com/2017/01/07/automotive-innovations-at-ces-2017/
All rights are reserved and belongs to a source media.

CES 2017: Clothes-folding Laundroid robot readies for launch

0

NewsHubA clothes-folding robot that has been in development for more than a decade is about to go on sale.
Laundroid will initially be targeted at hospitals and nursing homes in Japan, but its maker aims to sell a tweaked version to families worldwide before the end of the decade.
Chris Foxx caught up with the project’s founder at the CES tech show in Las Vegas.
Follow all our CES coverage at bbc.co.uk/ces2017

Similarity rank: 1.1
Sentiment rank: 2.3

© Source: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-38541533
All rights are reserved and belongs to a source media.

Trump tweets again about Sweden, attacks media

0

NewsHubDonald Trump said yesterday that it would be “stupid” for the US not to develop a close relationship with Russia, despite claims it tried to influence his election victory.
His comments followed the disclosure that UK spy services had warned their US counterparts as far back as 2015 that the Russians were engaged in hacking Democratic Party computers in an attempt to shape the outcome of the presidential election.
US intelligence agencies have accused Russia’s President Vladimir Putin of launching an “influence campaign” to damage Hillary Clinton. The report, issued last Friday, said Russia showed a “clear preference” for Donald Trump and carried out cyber attacks and issued propaganda to both boost his chances and undermine confidence in American democracy.
The report, ordered by Barack Obama, concluded that Putin had “aspired to help President-elect Trump’s election chances when possible by discrediting Clinton and publicly contrasting her unfavourably to him”.
Significantly, it found that UK spy chiefs were among the first to raise the alarm and warn the US that Russia was responsible for the breach of the Democratic National Committee computer servers.
Mr Trump insisted on Friday that foreign meddling had “absolutely no effect” on the outcome of the election, and declined to say whether he believed Russia was behind the hacks. Yesterday he said that only “stupid” people would criticise the US for having a good relationship with Russia.
In the latest of a series of tweets the president-elect wrote: “Having a good relationship with Russia is a good thing, not a bad thing. Only ‘stupid’ people, or fools, would think that it is bad! ”
Another said: “We have enough problems around the world without yet another one. When I am President, Russia will respect us far more than they do now and both countries will, perhaps, work together to solve some of the many great and pressing problems and issues of the WORLD! ”
The US intelligence report, reflecting the joint assessment of the CIA and the FBI and the National Security Agency, suggested that some of these early tip-offs about Russia’s activities came from voice intercepts, computer traffic or human sources outside the US, as British intelligence became aware that emails and other data from the DNC was flowing out of the country.
The US president-elect was briefed by senior intelligence officials for nearly two hours on Friday, describing the briefing in a statement as “a constructive meeting and conversation with the leaders of the intelligence community”.
It is unclear whether officials specifically brought the British role to Trump’s attention.
Among those identified by US intelligence as taking part in the hacking is a young Russian computer expert identified as Alisa Shevchenko, whose companies Esage Lab and ZOR are among those now included on an American sanctions list.
Alisa Shevchenko, who is currently based outside the Thai capital Bangkok, has denied having knowingly worked for the Russian government.
The report did not draw any conclusion as to what effect the Russian hacking had on the election, saying it was beyond its responsibility to analyse American “political processes” or public opinion.
The issue of Russia’s relations with Western Europe became even more fraught yesterday when Sweden’s most respected foreign policy institute accused it of using underhand methods in an “information war”, including fake news, counterfeit documents, and other disinformation, to influence Swedish decision-making.
The report by Martin Kragh, from the Swedish Institute of International Affairs, said Russia was using ‘active measures’ in its information war against Sweden, in a bid to steer it away from joining Nato.
Russia has long opposed either Sweden or Finland joining Nato and has threatened to mass troops on the Finnish border if it moves to join the military alliance.
Meanwhile, the former deputy chief of the CIA has warned that MI6 and other allied intelligence agencies may shy away from sharing information with the CIA if they feel the agency does not have the confidence of the incoming US president.
Michael Morell, was the top US liaison to British intelligence between 2003 and 2006 and worked closely with British spy chiefs during the Iraq War and in the aftermath of the July 7 bombings.
In a scathing article in yesterday’s New York Times, he warned that Donald Trump’s public disparagement of the CIA was likely to damage its relationship with its overseas counterparts.
“Why would a foreign intelligence service take the CIA seriously (and share important information with it) when the American president doesn’t? ” he wrote.

Similarity rank: 1.1
Sentiment rank: -1.9

© Source: http://www.independent.ie/world-news/north-america/us-election-2016/trump-fires-broadside-at-stupid-critics-of-russians-35349699.html
All rights are reserved and belongs to a source media.

Стрелку из Флориды грозит смертная казнь

0

NewsHubФедеральная прокуратура США выдвинула официальные обвинения подозреваемому в стрельбе в аэропорту Форт-Лодердейл штата Флорида Эстебану Сантьяго – ему грозит смертная казнь.
Об этом сообщило ” AP “.
Прокуроры выдвинули Сантьяго обвинения в насильственных действиях, которые привели к гибели людей, и два обвинения в нарушении законов об огнестрельном оружии.
Если он будет признан виновным в этих преступлениях, ему могут вынести смертный приговор.
По данным следователей, Сантьяго заранее планировал нападение, приехал в аэропорт намеренно и стрелял по людям без разбора. Латиноамериканец, ветеран войны в Ираке ранее уже попадал в поле зрения спецслужб и был отправлен на лечение проблем психического характера.
ЧИТАЙТЕ ТАКЖЕ: “Слышал голоса в голове” – появились подробности о стрелке в аэропорту Флориды
Следователи не исключали, что терроризм мог быть мотивацией нападения. ФБР провело обыск в доме Сантьяго и не выявило в его компьютере и телефоне контактов с террористическими организациями.

Similarity rank: 7.7

© Source: http://gazeta.ua/ru/articles/world-life/_strelku-iz-floridy-grozit-smertnaya-kazn/745134
All rights are reserved and belongs to a source media.

Timeline words data