Home Blog Page 84136

W 2016 roku CBŚP przechwyciło o ponad tonę narkotyków więcej niż rok wcześniej

0

NewsHub– Działania policjantów CBŚP spowodowały, iż zarówno w kraju jak i za granicą zabezpieczono ponad 2,5 tys. kilogramów narkotyków. Wśród zabezpieczonych środków odurzających były zarówno, popularne na rynku, marihuana, haszysz, amfetamina, jak również należące do droższych narkotyków – heroina i kokaina. Funkcjonariusze udaremnili również wprowadzenie na rynek ponad 71 tys. tabletek ecstasy – powiedział w środę kom. Rafał Szymański z zespołu prasowego CBŚP.
Jedną z większych spraw realizowanych przez funkcjonariuszy CBŚP było zatrzymanie 48-letniego Cezarego P. i czterech innych osób związanych z handlem kokainą. – Klientami dilera z warszawskiej Woli byli przedstawiciele biznesu i znani celebryci. Mężczyzna został namierzony, gdy sprzedawał swojemu stałemu klientowi kokainę. Jak ustalili funkcjonariusze CBŚP poszczególni klienci potrafili w ciągu miesiąca wydać na kokainę po kilkanaście tysięcy złotych, płacąc dilerowi za jedną porcję nawet 500 zł – powiedział Szymański.
Jak dodał, na handlu kokainą P. w ostatnich dwóch latach zarobił około miliona złotych, które lokował w nieruchomościach, a także włożył w uruchomienie lokalu gastronomicznego w centrum Warszawy.
W lipcu 2016 r. policjanci CBŚP pod Elblągiem zabezpieczyli prawie 52 kg marihuany o czarnorynkowej wartości 1,6 mln zł. Zatrzymano dwóch mężczyzn, którzy usłyszeli zarzuty obrotu środkami odurzającymi.
Współpraca ze Strażą Graniczną i Izbą Celną
Podczas spraw związanych ze zwalczaniem przestępczości narkotykowej, policjanci CBŚP współpracowali m.in. z funkcjonariuszami Straży Granicznej i Izby Celnej. – Owocem tej współpracy było przejęcie 65 kilogramów marihuany i haszyszu o wartości blisko 2 mln złotych. Narkotyki były przemycane z jednego z krajów Unii Europejskiej i miały trafić do odbiorców w Małopolsce – powiedział Szymański. Zatrzymano pięciu mężczyzn trudniących się wprowadzaniem narkotyków do obrotu.
Funkcjonariusze CBŚP współpracowali także z policjantami innych państw, którzy również zwalczają przestępczość narkotykową. Efektem współdziałania z policjantami z Hiszpanii było rozbicie międzynarodowej grupy przestępczej, która przemycała marihuanę w transportach warzyw. W prowincji Walencja zatrzymano 13 osób. Funkcjonariusze zlikwidowali 7 plantacji marihuany i zabezpieczyli 159 kg gotowego narkotyku.
Polacy z rozbitego gangu pruszkowskiego
Kolejnym przykładem współpracy międzynarodowej było rozbicie zorganizowanej grupy przestępczej trudniącej się przemytem i handlem narkotykami na terenie Europy. Podczas koordynowanych przez Europol działań policjanci zatrzymali 23 osoby, w tym 12 Polaków wywodzących się z rozbitego przed laty gangu pruszkowskiego. Grupa zorganizowała swoją działalność na hiszpańskim wybrzeżu Costa del Sol, tam zatrzymano najwięcej osób. Poza tym, zatrzymania miały miejsce we Francji i Danii. Policjanci zabezpieczyli ponad tonę haszyszu i broń.
W maju ubiegłego roku, funkcjonariusze CBŚP i policjanci z Liberca na terenie pogranicza zatrzymali 15 osób. Zarówno po stronie czeskiej, jak i polskiej zlikwidowano laboratoria i linie produkcyjne amfetaminy. Grupie udowodniono wprowadzenie do obrotu 7 kilogramów metamfetaminy. Podczas zatrzymań, policjanci zabezpieczyli m.in. 4,5 kg gotowych narkotyków.
Najwięcej haszyszu
W sumie w roku 2016 zabezpieczono ponad 2,5 tys. kilogramów narkotyków, w tym prawie 1,2 tys. kg haszyszu, ponad 850 kg marihuany, ponad 400 kg amfetaminy, 36 kg kokainy i prawie 6 kg heroiny, a także ponad 71 tys. tabletek ecstasy. Dla porównania w 2015 r. zabezpieczono ponad 1,3 tys. kg narkotyków i ponad 50 tys. tabletek ecstasy.
– W ubiegłym roku zlikwidowano również 12 laboratoriów, w których produkowane były narkotyki i 108 plantacji – powiedział kom. Szymański.
PAP

Similarity rank: 1.1
Sentiment rank: -2.1

© Source: http://www.polsatnews.pl/wiadomosc/2017-01-25/w-2016-roku-cbsp-przechwycilo-o-ponad-tone-narkotykow-wiecej-niz-w-2015-r/
All rights are reserved and belongs to a source media.

Supreme Court Brexit ruling: What happens next?

0

NewsHubThe Supreme Court has dismissed the government’s appeal in a landmark case about Brexit, meaning Parliament will be required to give its approval before official talks on leaving the EU can begin.
The ruling is a significant, although not totally unexpected, setback for Theresa May.
What will the prime minister do next and what impact will the ruling have on the process of leaving the EU, following last year’s referendum vote?
The highest court in the UK dismissed the government’s argument that it has the power to begin official Brexit negotiations with the rest of the EU without Parliament’s prior agreement.
By a margin of eight to three, the 11 justices upheld November’s High Court ruling which stated that it would be unlawful for the government to rely on executive powers known as the royal prerogative to implement the outcome of last year’s referendum.
But it said the precise form the legislation should take was “entirely a matter for Parliament”.
Attorney General Jeremy Wright said the government would “comply with the judgement of the court and do all that is necessary to implement it”.
In a statement to Parliament setting out details of the government’s legislative response, David Davis said he intended to publish an outline bill “within days”.
The BBC’s political editor Laura Kuenssberg said the details could be announced as early as Thursday, with a view to staging the first vote next week and getting it through the Commons within a couple of weeks.
We will get more details from the government later this week, with draft legislation already said to have been prepared in preparation for the appeal being rejected.
The new bill is expected to be short, with the government’s lawyer suggesting during the hearing that “one-line” legislation could be put forward.
The justices did not specify the form the new legislation should take.
Both the House of Commons and House of Lords will have to vote in favour of it.
The bill will be given special priority by Parliament, whose order of business is still largely controlled by ministers.
While Tory MPs would like to see it fast-tracked through Parliament, many Labour, Lib Dem and SNP MPs will want as much time as possible to discuss a variety of issues and to make amendments.
The SNP responded to the ruling by saying it would table 50 “serious and substantive” amendments.
Labour said it too would seek to amend the bill but would not “frustrate” the Brexit process.
However it pans out, BBC Parliamentary correspondent Mark D’Arcy says the bill could pass through the Commons before the half-term recess in the middle of February, giving ample time for the Lords to then consider it and for it to become law before the end of March.
While there are some MPs who want the process to be delayed, they are vastly outnumbered by those who want the government to get on with it so that the UK will have left the EU by the time of the next election – scheduled for May 2020.
In theory, yes there is. But in reality it is extremely unlikely to happen.
Few, if any, Conservative MPs are likely to vote against Article 50. In fact, only one – the europhile former chancellor Ken Clarke – has said he will do so.
Given that the Tories have a working majority of 15 in the Commons, this means that the bill is guaranteed to pass – especially since a majority of Labour MPs have said they will not stand in the way of the process and many will actually vote for Article 50.
Although the Lib Dems, the SNP and some Labour MPs are likely to vote against, this will make little difference. What will be more interesting is if a coalition of pro-European Conservatives and opposition MPs join forces to win concessions, over the extent of Parliamentary scrutiny of the two-year process.
Events in the Lords – where the government does not have a working majority and there are 178 non-affiliated cross-bench peers – could be more unpredictable. Mark D’Arcy says there are murmurings of an organised attempt to resist Article 50 and a “doomed last stand” by diehard Remainers.
But amid warnings that any attempt to block Brexit could trigger a general election, in which the future of the Lords would be a major issue – it is likely that the skirmishes will amount to just that and the government will eventually get its way.
The Supreme Court case wasn’t just a battle over the powers of the executive and the legislature.
The justices heard a number of separate but related challenges to the government’s Brexit approach, centred around the involvement of the devolved administrations in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland.
But the court unanimously ruled that devolved administrations did not need to be consulted, and did not have a right to veto Article 50.
The government has previously said Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland will be kept fully involved.

Similarity rank: 7
Sentiment rank: 3.4

© Source: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-38721650
All rights are reserved and belongs to a source media.

Trump Supreme Court justice pick narrows to two names

0

NewsHubLast Updated Jan 24, 2017 6:21 PM EST
The choice to fill the Supreme Court vacancy left by the death of Justice Antonin Scalia is down to two names — Denver-based U. S. Court of Appeals Judge Neil Gorsuch and U. S. District Court Judge Thomas Hardiman of Pennsylvania, according to two sources close to the selection process.
This photo provided by the 10th U. S. Circuit Court of Appeals shows Judge Neil Gorsuch, via AP
Gorsuch has a slight edge — CBS News’ Jan Crawford reported that Gorsuch was the front-runner over the weekend.
President Donald Trump has the chance to shape the direction of the Supreme Court for decades to come. He’s expected to nominate a justice to the…
But as Mr. Trump narrows the field, “many voices” are “making calls” on Hardiman’s behalf, and he cannot be ruled out, one source said. Hardiman has to be considered a serious contender, just on the heels of Gorsuch.
Tuesday’s White House meeting with Senate leaders and members of the Judiciary Committee is designed to be a general discussion to see if any names on Trump’s list of 21 potential high court nominees would present problems. It is not designed to elicit specific endorsements or opposition to any specific nominee. From the White House perspective, it is viewed as a gesture of respect of the Senate advise-and-consent role.
Both Hardiman and Gorsuch are regarded as conservative, but neither is thought by the White House to be unconfirmable. Nor are they nominees who would, the White House believes, elicit a massive Senate Democratic uprising. That is the working theory, but confirmation fights in the modern era have been unpredictable. There is a sense within the White House that 10 Senate Democrats up for re-election in 2018 from pro-Trump states are particularly vulnerable and MAY vote for confirmation — hence the White House’s desire to move as rapidly as possible to preserve its leverage.
Hardiman is a judge on the Third Circuit Court of Appeals. Originally from Waltham, Mass., Hardiman attended Notre Dame and Georgetown Law School. He worked in private practice in Pittsburgh, then was a hearing office for the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Gorsuch is a former Washington, D. C. lawyer and Supreme Court clerk educated at Harvard and Oxford who is considered a solid conservative. He sailed through his Senate confirmation in 2006, and was even introduced by both the Republican (then-Sen. Wayne Allard) and Democratic (then-Sen. Ken Salazar) senators from his home state of Colorado.
Gorsuch’s ascendancy may come as a surprise because legal conservatives had been urging Trump to tap Alabama-based federal appeals court judge William Pryor. A former Alabama deputy attorney general under Attorney General nominee Sen. Jeff Sessions, Pryor was appointed to fill Sessions’ position as Alabama attorney general after he was elected to the U. S. Senate. Pryor is a highly regarded judge who many believe would have been the most worthy successor to Antonin Scalia, but his nomination to the Eleventh Circuit in 2003 was hotly contested.
Selecting Hardiman would diversify the high court in one way — if confirmed, Hardiman would be the only one on the high court without an Ivy League degree. The Massachusetts native became the first person in his family to go to college when he attended the University of Notre Dame. He paid his way through law school at Georgetown by driving a taxi.
Democrats filibustered Pryor’s nomination because of his views on abortion – during his confirmation hearing, Pryor stood by his comments calling Roe v. Wade “the worst abomination in the history of constitutional law.” Ultimately, Bush appointed Pryor to the bench using a recess appointment in 2004, and Pryor was permanently confirmed as part of the Gang of 14 compromise negotiated by Arizona Sen. John McCain in 2005.
Republicans on Capitol Hill told Mr. Trump they’re wary of the blowback from Democrats if Pryor were to be his pick. But Pryor also was no favorite of the religious right. Because he is not a results-oriented judge, Pryor does not always reach a conservative outcome.
For example, he joined an appeals court opinion supporting transgender rights, consistent with Supreme Court precedent. And as state attorney general, Pryor sought to remove Alabama Supreme Court Chief Justice Roy Moore from office after Moore refused a federal court order to remove a massive 10 Commandments rock from the state courthouse.
One potential obstacle for Hardiman is a gender stereotyping case, similar to a case that tripped up Pryor with the religious right. Writing for the court, Hardiman’s opinion allowed a gender discrimination lawsuit filed by a gay man describing himself as “effiminate” to proceed.
Mr. Trump’s team believes Gorsuch is significantly less likely to inflame the left, while also being an acceptable choice to the far right. Gorsuch sided with Hobby Lobby in the Obamacare contraception case and wrote a book about assisted suicide that indicated his pro-life views. Before joining the bench, Gorsuch took few if any controversial positions as a D. C. lawyer in private practice or during his brief stint in the civil division of the Bush Justice Department.
Hardiman ‎is also seen as a solid conservative, but with a slightly more enigmatic record. Hardiman serves on the same court as President Trump’s sister, Maryanne Trump Barry.

Similarity rank: 5.4
Sentiment rank: 2.1

© Source: http://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-supreme-court-justice-pick-narrows-to-two-names/
All rights are reserved and belongs to a source media.

AP: Trump to start rolling out executive actions on immigration Wednesday

0

NewsHubDonald Trump appeared to acknowledge Friday that Americans, not Mexicans, would likely write the check for his promised wall along the Southern b…
Later in the week, the president is expected to restrict the flow of refugees to the United States. The proposed plans include at least a four-month halt on all refugee admissions, as well as temporary ban on people coming from some Muslim majority countries, according to a representative of a public policy organization that monitors refugee issues. The person was briefed on the details of that proposed action by a government official and outlined the expected steps for The Associated Press.
The officials and the public policy organization’s representative insisted on anonymity in order to outline the plans ahead of Trump’s official announcements. The president is expected to sign the first actions Wednesday during a trip to the Department of Homeland Security, with additional actions being rolled out over the next few days, according to one official.
“Big day planned on NATIONAL SECURITY tomorrow,” Mr. Trump tweeted on Tuesday night. “Among many other things, we will build the wall!”
The tweet followed one that appeared to be deleted. A tweet at 9:34 p.m. posted from his account misspelled “among” as “amoung” and did not capitalize national security.
Big day planned on NATIONAL SECURITY tomorrow. Among many other things, we will build the wall!
It appeared as though the refugee restrictions were still to be finalized. The person briefed on the proposals said they included a ban on entry to the U. S. for at least 30 days from countries including Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen, though the person cautioned the details could still change.
There is also likely to be an exception in the refugee stoppage for those fleeing religious persecution if their religion is a minority in their country. That exception could cover Christians fleeing Muslim-majority nations.
President-elect Donald Trump answers questions from CBS News’ Major Garrett about his plan to build a wall along the U. S.-Mexico border and his t…
Trump campaigned on pledges to tighten U. S. immigration policies, including beefing up border security and stemming the flow of refugees. He also called for halting entry to the U. S. from Muslim countries, but later shifted the policy to a focus on what he called “extreme vetting” for those coming from countries with terrorism ties.
As president, Trump can use an executive order to halt refugee processing. President George W. Bush used that same power in the immediate aftermath of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks. Refugee security vetting was reviewed and the process was restarted several months later.
While the specific of Trump’s orders were unclear, both administration officials said Wednesday’s actions would focus in part on the president’s plans to construct a wall along the southern border with Mexico. Trump’s insistence that Mexico would pay for the wall was among his most popular proposals on the campaign trail, sparking enthusiastic cheers at his raucous rallies.
Mexico has repeatedly said it will not pay for any border wall. Earlier this month, Trump said the building project would initially be paid for with a congressionally approved spending bill and Mexico will eventually reimburse the U. S., though he has not specified how he would guarantee payments.
Trump will meet with Mexican President Enrique Pena Nieto at the White House next week.
In claiming authority to build a wall, Trump may rely on a 2006 law that authorized several hundred miles of fencing along the 2,000-mile frontier. That bill led to the construction of about 700 miles of various kinds of fencing designed to block both vehicles and pedestrians.
The Secure Fence Act was signed by then-President George W. Bush and the majority of the fencing in Texas, New Mexico, Arizona and California was built before he left office. The last remnants were completed after President Barack Obama took office in 2009.
The Trump administration also must adhere to a decades-old border treaty with Mexico that limits where and how structures can be built along the border. The 1970 treaty requires that structures cannot disrupt the flow of the rivers, which define the U. S.-Mexican border along Texas and 24 miles in Arizona, according to The International Boundary and Water Commission, a joint U. S.-Mexican agency that administers the treaty.
Other executive actions expected Wednesday include bolstering border patrol agents and ending what Republicans have argued is a catch-and-release system at the border. Currently, some immigrants caught crossing the border illegally are given notices to report back to immigration officials at a later date.
If Trump’s actions would result in those caught being immediately jailed, the administration would have to grapple with how to pay for jail space to detain everyone and what to do with children caught crossing the border with their parents.

Similarity rank: 7.6
Sentiment rank: -1.2

© Source: http://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-to-start-rolling-out-executive-actions-immigration-wednesday/
All rights are reserved and belongs to a source media.

Lego copycats fool China boss

0

NewsHubLego – the toy loved by children around the world – now has a factory in China.
But companies making copycat versions remain a big problem.
And some of them are so convincing even the boss can’t tell them apart.
Produced by Robin Brant and Curtis Rodda

Similarity rank: 0
Sentiment rank: -4.4

© Source: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-38729557
All rights are reserved and belongs to a source media.

Terrex: Hong Kong to return Singapore army vehicles

0

NewsHubHong Kong has said it will return nine Singaporean military vehicles that it seized in November.
The Terrex infantry carriers were impounded on their way back from Taiwan, where Singapore had been using them in training exercises.
The incident sparked a diplomatic dispute between Singapore and China, which has sovereignty over Hong Kong.
Hong Kong officials said there had been a suspected breach of law and that there could be criminal prosecution.
Singapore sings for return of army vehicles
Singapore had demanded the release of the vehicles, which were being transported by a commercial carrier. It said they were property of a sovereign state so had diplomatic immunity.
The incident put a strain on an already tense relationship between Singapore and China, which controls Hong Kong’s foreign affairs.
Beijing has been angered by what it sees as Singapore’s support for countries which oppose its claims to large areas of contested territory in the South China Sea.
Singapore also has a close relationship with Taiwan and, lacking land space itself, has trained its troops there for decades.
China views Taiwan as a breakaway Chinese province which will one day be reunited with the mainland, by force if necessary.
Hong Kong officials said on Tuesday they had now completed their investigations and the vehicles would be sent back, but that legal action could still be taken.
Singapore’s foreign ministry said it was a “positive outcome” and thanked Hong Kong for its “co-operation in resolving this matter”.
In a Facebook post referencing the upcoming Lunar New Year celebrations this weekend, Defence Minister Ng Eng Hen said he was “looking forward to this happy reunion with all Singaporeans in the Year of the Rooster”.

Similarity rank: 1.1
Sentiment rank: -2.9

© Source: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-38740651
All rights are reserved and belongs to a source media.

Minnesota Gov. Mark Dayton says he has prostate cancer

0

NewsHubDayton underwent tests Tuesday at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester to determine what caused the collapse. In a statement Tuesday evening, Clinic spokesman Karl Oestreich said the governor’s fall was not related to the cancer diagnosis.
“Mayo Clinic believes this episode was situational and related to standing for a long time while giving his speech and possible dehydration,” Oestreich said. Dayton was encouraged to stay hydrated.
The governor will return to Mayo next week to determine treatment for the prostate cancer.
“I take it very seriously. I have an obligation to all of the people of Minnesota,” he said.
Dayton, who turns 70 on Thursday, has had other health issues since taking office in 2011. A series of back and hip surgeries have left him with a limp, though he said Tuesday he’s no longer in pain. He was briefly hospitalized last year after fainting at a campaign event, later blaming the episode on overheating and dehydration.
Dayton was about 40 minutes into his annual address Monday night when he began stumbling over his words and trailed off, shaking after taking a sip of water and crumbling behind the lectern, where he struck his head. Several state officials rushed to his side to catch him, and medical professionals serving in the Legislature gave aid.
He appeared conscious as he was helped to a back room and later walked out of the Capitol on his own to return home, where a top staffer said he was given routine tests by emergency medical technicians.
Dayton returned to work Tuesday to unveil his proposal for a $45.8 billion budget. He told reporters that he felt fine Monday until about a minute before losing consciousness.
“It was a very brief episode,” he said.
Dayton said he was diagnosed with prostate cancer Friday after a biopsy and had planned to reveal it after his consultation next week. He said doctors believe the cancer hasn’t spread past his prostate, suggesting it was caught early, and that it would likely be treated with either surgery or radiation. His father, who died in late 2015, underwent successful prostate cancer surgery and lived 25 more years.
Prostate cancer is the most common cancer in men after skin cancer, and the third-leading cause of cancer deaths in men behind lung and colon/rectal cancer. According to the National Cancer Institute, prostate cancer usually grows slowly, most men with it are older than 65, and most won’t die of the disease.
Dr. Peter Sershon, a urologist with Metro Urology in St. Paul and director of the Prostate Cancer Center at United Hospital who is not involved in Dayton’s care, said options could range from close monitoring to drug treatment to surgery. None of those are likely to affect Dayton’s ability to govern over the long run, he said.
Dayton frequently joked Tuesday as he was asked about his health, saying he was still fit to continue as governor because “as far as I know, there are no brain cells in my prostate” and noting his collapse Monday evening generated good will with Republicans.
“If I had known it would result in Republicans not criticizing my speech, I might have tried it years ago,” he cracked.
Dayton’s latest health troubles overshadowed an ambitious agenda that will likely clash with Republicans.
Dayton was rounding into a proposal to offer a state-run public health care option for all Minnesota residents when he fainted during his State of the State address. On Tuesday, he released a more detailed proposal for a $45.8 billion budget – a nearly 10 percent increase from the state’s current budget – that includes extra funding for a new preschool program and boosting overall public school spending.
The state has posted several years of surpluses, and the governor has pointed to that financial stability as a hallmark of his six years in office, insisting he’ll safeguard against a return to painful budget shortfalls.

Similarity rank: 8.5
Sentiment rank: -2.6

© Source: http://www.cbsnews.com/news/minnesota-governor-mark-dayton-says-he-has-prostate-cancer/
All rights are reserved and belongs to a source media.

For the first time ever, 3 black actresses were nominated in the same Oscars category

0

NewsHubWinner of Best Performance by an Actress in a Supporting Role for “Dreamgirls” Jennifer Hudson poses in the press room during the 79th Annual Academy Awards at the Kodak Theatre on February 25, 2007 in Hollywood, California.
This isn’t the first time that three women of color have been nominated in the same category. That history was made in the Best Supporting Actress race back in 2007, when Jennifer Hudson was nominated for “Dreamgirls” and both Adriana Barraza and Rinko Kikuchiand were nominated for “Babel.” Hudson took home the prize that year. Also, three men of color were all nominated in the Best Supporting Actor race back in 2004.
This year, however, is significant for the fact that — just one year after the #OscarsSoWhite controversy dominated the discussion around the Academy Awards — seven people of color were nominated in the acting categories alone, six of which were African-American actors and three of which were African-American women in the very same category. Last year, there were zero people of color nominated in the acting categories.
Beyond that, Viola Davis made history this year, becoming the first black actress to be nominated for three Oscars.
Viola Davis with Denzel Washington in “Fences.”
“Moonlight” director Barry Jenkins also made history Tuesday morning by becoming the first African-American filmmaker to be nominated for Best Picture, Best Director and one of the screenplay awards. Should he walk away with the Oscar for Best Director next month, he will make history as the first black man to ever win in that category.

Similarity rank: 5.6
Sentiment rank: 0

© Source: http://www.cbsnews.com/news/for-the-first-time-ever-3-black-actresses-were-nominated-in-the-same-oscars-category/
All rights are reserved and belongs to a source media.

19 things wrong with Daniel Hannan’s tweet about the women’s march There is nothing compassionate about Britain’s Dickensian tolerance of begging

0

NewsHubSince Daniel Hannan, a formerly obscure MEP, has emerged as the anointed intellectual of the Brexit elite, The Staggers is charting his ascendancy…
State of this:
I mean honestly, where do you even begin? Even by Daniel’s rarefied standards of idiocy, this is a stonker. How is it stupid? Let me count the ways.
1. “Our female head of government” implies the existence of “their female head of government”. Which is odd, because the tweet is clearly aimed at Hillary Clinton, who isn’t anybody’s head of government.
Way to kick someone when they’re down, Dan. What next? “So pleased that my daughter received a wide selection of Christmas presents, unlike those of certain families”?
2. I dunno, I’m no expert, but it’s just possible that there are reasons why so few women make it to the top of politics which don’t have anything to do with how marvellous Britain is.
3. Hillary Clinton was not “the last guy’s wife”. You can tell this, because she was not married to Barack Obama, whose wife is called Michelle. (Honestly, Daniel, I’m surprised you haven’t spotted the memes.)
4. She wasn’t married to the guy before him, come to that. Her husband stopped being president 16 years ago, since when she’s been elected to the Senate twice and served four years as Secretary of State.
5. I’m sure Hillary would love to have been able to run for president without reference to her husband – for the first few years of her marriage, indeed, she continued to call herself Hillary Rodham. But in 1980 Republican Frank White defeated Bill Clinton’s campaign to be re-elected as govenor of Arkansas, in part by mercilessly attacking the fact his wife still used her maiden name.
In the three decades since, Hillary has moved from Hillary Rodham, to Hillary Rodham Clinton, to Hillary Clinton. You can see this as a cynical response to conservative pressure, if you so wish – but let’s not pretend there was no pressure to subsume her political identity into that of her husband, eh? And let’s not forget that it came from your side of the fence, eh, Dan?
6. Also, let’s not forget that the woman you’re subtweeting is a hugely intelligent former senator and secretary of state, who Barack Obama described as the most qualified person ever to run for president. I’m sure you wouldn’t want to be so patronising as to imply that the only qualification she had was her husband, now, would you?
7. I’d love to know what qualifications Dan thinks are sufficient to become US president, and whether he believes a real estate mogul with an inherited fortune and a reality TV show has them.
8. Hillary Clinton got nearly 3m more votes than Donald Trump, by the way.
9. More votes than any white man who has ever run for president, in fact.
10. Certainly a lot more votes than Theresa May, who has never faced a general election as prime minister and became leader of the government by default after the only other candidate left in the race dropped out. Under the rules of British politics this is as legitimate a way of becoming PM as any, of course, I’m just not sure how winning a Tory leadership contest by default means she “ran in her own right” in a way that Hillary Clinton did not.
11. Incidentally, here’s a video of Daniel Hannan demanding Gordon Brown call an early election in 2009 on the grounds that “parliament has lost the moral mandate to carry on”.
So perhaps expecting him to understand how the British constitution works is expecting too much.
12. Why the hell is Hannan sniping at Hillary Clinton, who is not US president, when the man who is the new US president has, in three days, come out against press freedom, basic mathematics and objective reality? Sorry, I’m not moving past that.
13. Notice the way the tweet says that our “head of government ” got there on merit. That’s because our “head of state ” got the job because her great, great grandmother happened to be a protestant in 1701 and her uncle wanted to marry a divorcee – all of which makes it a bit difficult to say that our head of government “ran in her own right”. But hey, whatever makes you happy.
14. Is Daniel calling the US a banana republic? I mean, it’s a position I have some sympathy with in this particular week, but it’s an odd fit with the way he gets all hot and bothered whenever someone starts talking about the English-speaking peoples.
15. Incidentally, he stole this tweet from his 14-year-old daughter:
16. Who talks, oddly, like a 45-year-old man.
17. And didn’t even credit her! It’s exactly this sort of thing which stops women making it to the top rank of politics, Daniel.
18. He tweeted that at 6.40am the day after the march. Like, he spent the whole of Saturday trying to come up with a zinger, and then eventually woke up early on the Sunday unable to resist stealing a line from his teenage daughter. One of the great orators of our age, ladies and gentlemen.
19. He thinks he can tweet this stuff without people pointing and laughing at him.
In Rochdale, like many other towns across the country, we’re working hard to support small businesses and make our high streets inviting places for people to visit. So it doesn’t help when growing numbers of aggressive street beggars are becoming a regular fixture on the streets, accosting shoppers.
I’ve raised this with the police on several occasions now and when I tweeted that they needed to enforce laws preventing begging and refer them to appropriate services, all hell broke loose on social media. I was condemned as heartless, evil and, of course, the favourite insult of all left-wing trolls, “a Tory”.
An article in the Guardian supported this knee-jerk consensus that I was a typically out-of-touch politician who didn’t understand the underlying reasons for begging and accused me of being “misguided” and showing “open disdain” for the poor.
The problem is, this isn’t true, as I know plenty about begging.
Before I became an MP, I worked as a researcher for The Big Issue and went on to set up a social research company that carried out significant research on street begging, including a major report that was published by the homeless charity, Crisis.
When I worked at The Big Issue , the strapline on the magazine used to say: “Working not Begging”. This encapsulated its philosophy of dignity in work and empowering people to help themselves. I’ve seen many people’s lives transformed through the work of The Big Issue , but I’ve never seen one person’s life transformed by thrusting small change at them as they beg in the street.
The Big Issue ’s founder, John Bird, has argued this position very eloquently over the years. Giving to beggars helps no one, he says. “On the contrary, it locks the beggar in a downward spiral of abject dependency and victimhood, where all self-respect, honesty and hope are lost.”
Even though he’s now doing great work in the House of Lords, much of Bird’s transformative zeal is lost on politicians. Too many on the right have no interest in helping the poor, while too many on the left are more interested in easing their conscience than grappling with the hard solutions required to turn chaotic lives around.
But a good starting point is always to examine the facts.
The Labour leader of Manchester City Council, Richard Leese, has cited evidence that suggests that 80 per cent of street beggars in Manchester are not homeless. And national police figures have shown that fewer than one in five people arrested for begging are homeless.
Further research overwhelmingly shows the most powerful motivating force behind begging is to fund drug addiction. The homeless charity, Thames Reach, estimates that 80 per cent of beggars in London do so to support a drug habit , particularly crack cocaine and heroin, while drug-testing figures by the Metropolitan Police on beggars indicated that between 70 and 80 per cent tested positive for Class A drugs.
It’s important to distinguish that homelessness and begging can be very different sets of circumstances. As Thames Reach puts it, “most rough sleepers don’t beg and most beggars aren’t rough sleepers”.
And this is why they often require different solutions.
In the case of begging, breaking a chaotic drug dependency is hard and the important first step is arrest referral – ie. the police referring beggars on to specialised support services. The police approach to begging is inconsistent – with action often only coming after local pressure. For example, when West Midlands Police received over 1,000 complaints about street begging, a crackdown was launched. This is not the case everywhere, but only the police have the power to pick beggars up and start a process that can turn their lives around.
With drug-related deaths hitting record levels in England and Wales in recent years, combined with cuts to drug addiction services and a nine per cent cut to local authority health budgets over the next three years, all the conditions are in place for things to get a lot worse.
This week there will be an important homelessness debate in Parliament, as Bob Blackman MP’s Homelessness Reduction Bill is due to come back before the House of Commons for report stage. This is welcome legislation, but until we start to properly distinguish the unique set of problems and needs that beggars have, I fear begging on the streets will increase.
Eighteen years ago, I was involved in a report called Drugs at the Sharp End , which called on the government to urgently review its drug strategy. Its findings were presented to the government’s drugs czar Keith Hellawell on Newsnight and there was a sense that the penny was finally dropping.
I feel we’ve gone backwards since then. Not just in the progress that has been undone through services being cut, but also in terms of general attitudes towards begging.
A Dickensian tolerance of begging demonstrates an appalling Victorian attitude that has no place in 21st century Britain. Do we really think it’s acceptable for our fellow citizens to live as beggars with no real way out? And well-meaning displays of “compassion” are losing touch with pragmatic policy. This well-intentioned approach is starting to become symptomatic of the shallow, placard-waving gesture politics of the left, which helps no one and has no connection to meaningful action.
If we’re going make sure begging has no place in modern Britain, then we can’t let misguided sentiment get in the way of a genuine drive to transform lives through evidenced-based effective policy.

Similarity rank: 0.2
Sentiment rank: -1.4

© Source: http://www.newstatesman.com/politics/staggers/2017/01/19-things-wrong-daniel-hannan-s-tweet-about-women-s-march
All rights are reserved and belongs to a source media.

Japan gets first sumo champion in 19 years

0

NewsHubJapan has named its first home-grown sumo grand champion in almost two decades, in a boost to the traditional wrestling sport.
Kisenosato, 30, was promoted to the top-most yokozuna rank after his win in the first tournament of the year.
He is the first Japanese-born wrestler to make it since Wakanohana in 1998. Five wrestlers from American Samoa and Mongolia have made it in the interim.
Foreign wrestlers have come to dominate sumo, amid a lack of local recruits.
Kisenosato, who comes from Ibaraki to the north of Tokyo, has been an ozeki – the second-highest rank – since 2012.
After being runner-up on multiple occasions, he finally clinched his first tournament victory – and thereby his promotion to yokozuna – in the first competition of 2017.
“I think it was the support I received that enabled me to come this far,” he said in a tearful post-win interview on Sunday. “I desperately hung on at the end. ”
Many Japanese fans will be pleased to see a local wrestler back at the top of a sport regarded as a cultural icon.
As yokuzuna, Kisenosato, whose real name is whose real name is Yutaka Hagiwara, joins three other wrestlers in sumo’s ultimate rank – Hakuho, Harumafuji and Kakuryu.
The trio all come from Mongolia, following a path forged by sumo bad-boy Asashoryu, who was Mongolia’s first yokozuna in 2003.
The last Japanese-born wrestlers to reach the top were brothers Takanohana and Wakanohana, who made it to yokozuna in 1994 and 1998 respectively.
In recent years, sumo has been hit by falling numbers of Japanese recruits, partly because it is seen as a tough, highly regimented life.
Young sumo wrestlers train in tightly-knit “stables” where they eat, sleep and practise together and are sometimes subjected to harsh treatment in the belief that it will toughen them up.
In 2009, a leading coach was jailed for six years for ordering wrestlers to beat a young trainee who later died, in a case that shocked the nation.
Those at the top of Japan’s national sport are also expected to be role models, showing honour and humility – and can be criticised if they get it wrong.
Sumo must also compete with the rising popularity of football and baseball, which have vibrant leagues that draw crowds of young Japanese fans.
But the sport is attractive to wrestlers from other nations, who can earn a good living. Wrestlers have come from Estonia, Bulgaria, Georgia, China, Hawaii and Egypt, as well as Mongolia and American Samoa.
As a child, Kisenosato was a pitcher in his school’s baseball club before he chose to train as a wrestler at a stable in Tokyo.
He made his debut in 2002 and, reported Japan’s Mainichi newspaper, the 73 tournaments he took to become a yokozuna are the most by any wrestler since 1926.
Speaking to reporters after the tournament victory on Monday that sealed his elevation, Kisenosato said he was pleased to be holding the Emperor’s Cup trophy at last.
“I’ve finally got my hands on it and the sense of pleasure hasn’t changed,” he said. “It’s hard to put into words but it has a nice weight to it. “

Similarity rank: 1.1
Sentiment rank: 4.4

© Source: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-38721106
All rights are reserved and belongs to a source media.

Timeline words data