It was only a few years ago that Colorado’s courts were scolded by the U.S. Supreme Court for their « hostility » to Christianity.
It was only a few years ago that Colorado’s courts were scolded by the U.S. Supreme Court for their « hostility » to Christianity.
That came in the case in which the state persecuted baker Jack Phillips for his decision not to violate his Christian faith by promoting the LGBT lifestyle choices.
Now, after the Colorado Supreme Court, without charges or a conviction, declared President Donald Trump guilty of being an « insurrectionist, » it will be known for its « banana republic election interference. »
That’s according to legal expert Hans von Spakovsky.
The former Federal Election Commission member, a senior legal fellow at The Heritage Foundation, said the court, in a 4-3 ruling, said Trump cannot be on the state’s GOP primary ballot.
Von Spakovsky explained, « This is a nakedly partisan, anti-democratic decision that ignores the law and prior precedent. Under the text and history of the 14th Amendment, as well as court precedent, Trump is not disqualified from running for office for numerous reasons.
Home
United States
USA — mix Now Colorado courts gain reputation for 'banana republic election interference'