The passage of a law that mandates the release of government files on Jeffrey Epstein during the anniversary week of.The passage of a law that mandates the release of government files on Jeffrey Epstein during the anniversary week of the John Kennedy assassination seems fitting. When authorities hide the facts, the people will invent them. And the ones they invent always seem to flatter whatever worldview they hold. The…
The passage of a law that mandates the release of government files on Jeffrey Epstein during the anniversary week of the John Kennedy assassination seems fitting.
When authorities hide the facts, the people will invent them. And the ones they invent always seem to flatter whatever worldview they hold. The Epstein saga proves this. (RELATED: Why Releasing the Epstein Files Will Likely Undermine Justice)
If you hate Israel, then its intelligence agencies stand behind Jeffrey Epstein. If you hate Bill Clinton, then you imagine him living not in Chappaqua but on Epstein Island. If you hate Donald Trump, then his Mar-a-Lago ban on Epstein proves his knowledge and thus complicity in Epstein’s interest in underage girls. (RELATED: The Dog That Didn’t Bark and the Bombshell That Didn’t Explode)
In cases in which the public knows the facts, the players actually involved with Epstein rarely show remorse or accept accountability.
In cases in which the public knows the facts, the players actually involved with Epstein rarely show remorse or accept accountability.
Stacey Plaskett, a U.S. Virgin Islands delegate to the House of Representatives caught soliciting her donor Jeffrey Epstein’s advice by text as she questioned Trump administration figures a few months before Epstein’s death, told CNN that “this was seven years ago,” “as a prosecutor, you glean information where you can,” and, in a TMI-non sequitur mashup, “I lived in a house during childhood with a mother who had been sexually abused by her dad.
