Judge grants injunction requested by inmates to halt unprecedented executions scheduled to take place over the next few weeks
In May 13, 2011 file photo, a guard sits in a tower at the Arkansas Department of Correction Tucker Unit near Tucker, Ark.
LITTLE ROCK, Ark. — A federal judge on Saturday halted Arkansas’ unprecedented plan to execute seven inmates before the end of the month.
U. S. District Judge Kristine Baker granted a preliminary injunction requested by the inmates to block the executions. Arkansas was set to execute the first two inmates by lethal injection on Monday night. The state is expected to appeal the decision.
Gov. Asa Hutchinson, a Republican, had scheduled the executions to take place before the state’s supply of midazolam, one of its lethal injection drugs, expires at the end of the month. Arkansas hasn’t executed an inmate since 2005 because of drug shortages and legal challenges.
Seven death-row inmates in Arkansas are slated for execution by the end of April because the state’s execution drug is about to expire and the ma…
The federal injunction comes one day after an Arkansas judge blocked the use of the drug in the planned executions.
Arkansas hasn’t carried out a double execution since 1999. If carried out, the seven executions would be the most carried out by a state in such a short period of time since the U. S. Supreme Court reinstated the death penalty in 1976.
The inmates’ attorneys had challenges the compressed timetable and the state’s use of midazolam, which has been used in flawed executions in other states. The state’s attorneys have called the challenge an effort to delay the executions indefinitely and have said they don’t have a replacement identified for the drug if it expires.
The lawsuit is among a flurry of challenges the inmates have filed to halt the executions.
A terrorist attack in Texas by two U. S. citizens shows how hard it is to prevent such an attack — even when one of the terrorists is well-known to the FBI
A popular football coach convicted of murdering his wife gets a chance at freedom — can evidence withheld from his trial prove him innocent?
