Домой United States USA — Financial Trump prepares to nominate 10 federal judges as he puts his conservative...

Trump prepares to nominate 10 federal judges as he puts his conservative stamp on appeals courts

616
0
ПОДЕЛИТЬСЯ

The Trump administration named the first slate of judges it plans to nominate for key posts Monday as President Donald Trump works to pack the nation’s federal courts with conservatives.
The Trump administration named the first slate of judges it plans to nominate for key posts Monday as President Donald Trump works to pack the nation’s federal courts with more conservative voices.
White House press secretary Sean Spicer said that among the candidates are individuals previously named on Trump’s list of 21 possible picks for Supreme Court justice.
Trump will nominate Joan Larsen, who currently serves on Michigan’s Supreme Court, to the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals in Cincinnati, and David Stras, a justice on the Minnesota Supreme Court bench, to the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals in St. Louis.
Spicer said that another eight nominees would be named later Monday.
All nominees would require Senate confirmation.
The announcement comes less than a month after Trump’s final pick for the Supreme Court, Neil Gorsuch, was confirmed as justice to the nation’s highest court, restoring the court’s conservative tilt.
While appeals courts tends to have a lower public profile, their role in adjudicating many of the orders and laws put forth by the administration will be significant.
Trump’s earliest efforts to implement his agenda were dramatically derailed by the courts, which pushed back against his proposed travel ban and his order to withhold funding from ‘sanctuary cities’ that limit cooperation with immigration authorities.
After the 9th U. S. Circuit Court of Appeals rejected his immigration ban, Trump emphatically tweeted last February ‘SEE YOU IN COURT!’
The administration vowed that it would re-appeal the ruling and either revise its original executive order or write a new one from scratch. But while a revised ban was later released, that too was blocked by the courts.
Trump said last month that he is considering breaking up the 9th Circuit, a federal appeals court that covers Western states and which has long been a target of Republicans.
It would take congressional action to break up the 9th U. S. Circuit Court of Appeals. Republicans have introduced bills this year to do just that.
Gorsuch’s 66-day confirmation process was swift, but bitterly divisive. It saw Senate Republicans trigger the ‘nuclear option’ to eliminate the 60-vote filibuster threshold for Gorsuch and all future high court nominees.
The change allowed the Senate to hold a final vote to approve Gorsuch with a simple majority.
Most Democrats refused to support Gorsuch because they were still seething over the Republican blockade last year of President Barack Obama’s pick for the same seat, Merrick Garland.
Senate Republicans refused to even hold a hearing for Garland, saying a high court replacement should be up to the next president.
‘With this first slate of lower court nominees, it seems that the President is intent on continuing to outsource the judicial selection process to hard right, special interest groups rather than consulting with Senators on a bipartisan basis, ‘ Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer of New York said in a statement.
‘The President should work with members of both parties to pick judges from within the judicial mainstream, who will interpret the law rather than make it.’
Larsen, a former professor at the University of Michigan law school, has served on the Michigan Supreme Court bench since September 2015 and has written majority opinions in five cases.
She was a law clerk to the late Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, a conservative giant on the court, and spoke at a memorial following his death in February. She also served in the U. S. Justice Department when George W. Bush was president.
Stras formerly clerked for conservative U. S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas and is known to share the view of a limited role for the judiciary.

Continue reading...