Home Blog Page 71229

Families who sheltered fugitive Edward Snowden in Hong Kong looking for fast-track asylum to Canada

0

Their lawyer urged Canada to allow these seven people into the country while it processes their refugee claims
Read the never-been-told story of those two pivotal weeks when the most wanted man in the world was hidden in the depths of a Hong Kong slum.
MONTREAL — The families who sheltered U. S. fugitive Edward Snowden in Hong Kong are asking the Canadian government to fast-track their asylum applications.
The Hong Kong government rejected the families’ refugee requests last week and they are hoping to settle in Canada.
Snowden hid out in Hong Kong for two weeks in June 2013 after he leaked documents revealing extensive U. S. government surveillance.
The families were put in touch with Snowden because they shared the same lawyer, Robert Tibbo.
Tibbo said today Canada must allow these seven people into Canada while it processes their refugee claims because there is little chance they will be able to remain in Hong Kong.
He says the four adults and three children from the Philippines and Sri Lanka fear for their safety if they are deported home.
Tibbo is also trying to raise $15,000 to cover legal costs associated with appealing the Hong Kong government’s decision.

© Source: http://news.nationalpost.com/news/canada/families-who-sheltered-fugitive-edward-snowden-in-hong-kong-looking-for-fast-track-asylum-to-canada
All rights are reserved and belongs to a source media.

Bundeswehr sollte aus Incirlik abgezogen werden

0

Eine Ulmer Journalistin in Istanbul inhaftiert und Abgeordnete, die deutsche Soldaten in Incirlik nicht besuchen dürfen. Berlin sollte den Abzug der Soldaten in…
Nach ein paar Wochen ohne verbale Ausfälle des türkischen Präsidenten in Richtung Westen keimte da und dort bereits die Hoffnung, Recep Tayyip Erdogan könnte nach dem gewonnenen Referendum wieder etwas berechenbarer werden. Doch das war naiv.
Erst kam die Meldung, dass die Ulmer Journalistin Mesale Tolu in Istanbul im Gefängnis sitzt. Gestern wurde zur Gewissheit, dass die Türkei erneut Bundestagsabgeordneten das Recht verweigert, deutsche Soldaten auf der Nato-Luftwaffenbasis Incirlik zu besuchen.
Die Bundesregierung sprach von einem „absolut inakzeptablen“ Verhalten Ankaras. Doch das wird diesmal nicht ausreichen. Berlin sollte zügig den Abzug der Soldaten beschließen. Der Anti-IS-Kampf könnte auch von Jordanien aus geführt werden.
Denn das Argument, dass eine harte Reaktion nur Erdogan helfen würde, sich seinen autokratischen Staat von der Bevölkerung absegnen zu lassen, ist überholt. Nach der Volksabstimmung gehen die Verhaftungswellen weiter, werden die Reste des Rechtsstaates gefleddert. Flüchtlingsabkommen hin oder her – bei diesem Schauspiel darf Deutschland nicht Spalier stehen.
Alle Neuigkeiten zur Türkei lesen Sie auch hier in unserem News-Blog .

© Source: http://www.augsburger-allgemeine.de/politik/Bundeswehr-sollte-aus-Incirlik-abgezogen-werden-id41468711.html
All rights are reserved and belongs to a source media.

James Clapper: Defending democracy from Trump

0

James Clapper, former director of national intelligence, has become one of the staunchest critics of Trump and defenders of democracy in the wake of Comey’s firing, writes Juliette Kayyem.
There should be little doubt that the extraordinary days that followed his original testimony — most notably, almost exactly 24 hours later, President Donald Trump’s firing of FBI Director James Comey — began in some measure because of his understated but highly damning testimony.
Now, as he voluntarily makes the media circuit since the firing, Clapper sees the consequences of Trump’s actions as so threatening to our democracy that he is not likely to recede soon.
Let’s go back to last week; yes, it was only last week. All eyes were on former Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates as she testified about what she told the White House regarding former national security adviser Michael Flynn and his potentially compromising ties to foreign governments.
Yates made an impression, but it was Clapper who drew the real spotlight .
His testimony threw a wrench into a narrative that the White House had long used. According to that narrative, while serving as director of the national intelligence, Clapper said there was no proof of collusion between the White House and Russia. But Clapper admitted last Monday that he was unaware of the ongoing FBI investigation, so he wouldn’t have been in a position to know if there had been any evidence of collusion. In other words, the White House could no longer use him as a validator.
The next day, Trump fired Comey. And the White House scrambled to justify the decision. Then, in a series of tweets on Friday morning, Trump lashed out at Comey and suggested there may be tapes of their conversations. But don’t get distracted by the “tapes.” In that flurry of stream of consciousness and self-incrimination, Trump wrote this: “When James Clapper himself, and virtually everyone else with knowledge of the witch hunt, says there is no collusion, when does it end?”
He shouldn’t have focused on Clapper. Because, of course, that tweet amounted to a lie. Clapper had said something much more nuanced. Clearly, there was something about Clapper’s testimony that spooked the White House, and something that required the President to reclaim Clapper as a defender.
I suspect there are very few things that would have brought Clapper back to the media, including a sit down with Jake Tapper on “State of the Union, ” but the President telling tales about him may be one of them.
Clapper, though, isn’t back just to defend himself. He has now raised the stakes for the White House. It turns out that Comey told Clapper of his own discomfort with an invitation to dinner he received from Trump just a day after Yates told the White House about Flynn’s potential compromise.
And he is again, as he did as a long-serving intelligence operative, defending America. He is on the news circuit, speaking of his concern about how the institutions of our governance are being undermined and assaulted. There is a stress on our checks and balances that has seen no equivalent in our democracy, he warned. America is under threat “externally and internally, ” Clapper noted. “Internally from the President?” Tapper asked. “Exactly, ” Clapper replied.
There should be little doubt now that President Trump fired Comey to hinder the investigation of the Russia links; any suggestion it had to do with Comey’s conduct regarding the Clinton campaign has been debunked. Little doubt, indeed, because Trump admitted it himself when he told Lester Holt he had to put an end to the “Russia thing.” There may be plenty of evidence to question Trump’s veracity. But, in this, he is telling the truth. The President wants this investigation to end.
It is that assault on our norms, processes and constitutional order that make the week we just had so historic. How extraordinary? Clapper began that week testifying the enemy was Russia. He ended it, unwittingly it seemed, by telling us that the enemy was also within.

© Source: http://edition.cnn.com/2017/05/15/opinions/clapper-wins-week-opinion-kayyem/index.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+rss%2Fcnn_latest+%28RSS%3A+CNN+-+Most+Recent%29
All rights are reserved and belongs to a source media.

US accuses Syrian regime of mass executions

0

The Trump administration is accusing the Syrian government carrying out mass killings of thousands of prisoners and burning the dead bodies in a large crematorium outside the capital. (May 15)
The Trump administration is accusing the Syrian government carrying out mass killings of thousands of prisoners and burning the dead bodies in a large crematorium outside the capital. (May 15)

© Source: https://www.usatoday.com/videos/news/nation/2017/05/15/us-accuses-syrian-regime-mass-executions/101720896/
All rights are reserved and belongs to a source media.

White House: Cyberattack has not affected U. S. gov’ t

0

Washington — President Donald Trump’s homeland security adviser said Monday that the malware that has infected 300,000 computers in 150 countries is “in the wild, ” but so far has not infiltrated U. S. government
Washington — President Donald Trump’s homeland security adviser said Monday that the malware that has infected 300,000 computers in 150 countries is “in the wild, ” but so far has not infiltrated U. S. government systems.
Tom Bossert, assistant to the president for homeland security and counterterrorism, said three variants of the malware have been discovered and the U. S. government was closely monitoring the situation with officials in Britain.
“Overall, the U. S. infection rate has been lower than many parts of the world, but we may still see significant impacts in additional networks as these malware attacks morph and change, ” Bossert told reporters at the White House. “We had a small number of affected parties in the U. S., including FedEx. As of today, no federal systems are affected.”
Computers across the world were locked up Friday and users’ files held for ransom when dozens of countries were hit in a cyber-extortion attack that targeted hospitals, companies and government agencies. Cybersecurity experts say the unknown hackers who launched the “ransomware” attacks used a hole in Microsoft software that was discovered by the National Security Agency and exposed when NSA documents were leaked online.
The Department of Homeland Security is taking the lead on the investigation in the United States.
The Cyber Threat Intelligence Integration Center is keeping the U. S. government informed about classified information concerning the investigation, he said.
If Americans follow the patching information issued by the FBI, Microsoft and the Homeland Security Department, they will be protected from the malware and the variants, Bossert said.
“While it would be satisfying to hold accountable those responsible for this hack — something that we are working on quite seriously — the worm is in the wild, so to speak at this point, and patching is the most important message as a result, ” he said. “Despite appearing to be criminal activity intended to raise money, it appears that less than $70,000 has been paid in ransoms and we are not aware of payments that have led to any data recovery.”
Neither the FBI or NSA would comment Monday.

© Source: http://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/nation/2017/05/15/united-states-global-cyberattack/101721038/
All rights are reserved and belongs to a source media.

Trump, GOP control FBI chief pick despite Democrats' calls

0

While Democrats may trot out any number of demands or maneuvers to influence the selection of the next director of the FBI, here’s a reality check: Republican President Donald Trump fired…
WASHINGTON (AP) – While Democrats may trot out any number of demands or maneuvers to influence the selection of the next director of the FBI, here’s a reality check: Republican President Donald Trump fired James Comey, and he and his party will decide who’s next. And they’re not wasting time. Trump said Monday the selection process for a nominee for FBI director was “moving rapidly.” Democrats are irate over Comey’s abrupt ouster, and demanding Trump not nominate a partisan leader. Although they can mount considerable pressure before and during the confirmation process, they don’t control enough votes to influence the outcome. Republicans hold a 52-seat majority in the Senate. “If they can keep all 52 together, then it won’t matter, ” said Michael Gerhardt, a constitutional law professor at the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill. If Republicans “start to lose a couple, or two or three look like they’re not on board, that could create more pressure on the majority leader and the president to perhaps do something other than what they were planning on doing.” The next director will immediately be confronted with oversight of an FBI investigation into possible coordination between Russia and the Trump campaign, an inquiry the bureau’s acting head, Andrew McCabe, has called “highly significant.” The person also will have to win the support of rank-and-file agents angered by the ouster of Comey, who was broadly supported within the FBI. The new director will almost certainly have to work to maintain the bureau’s credibility by asserting political independence in the face of a president known for demanding loyalty from the people he appoints. Attorney General Jeff Sessions and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein interviewed eight candidates Saturday, including some who were not among the names distributed a day earlier by the White House. The list includes current and former FBI and Justice Department leaders, federal judges and Republicans who have served in Congress. Among those interviewed was McCabe, though it’s not clear how seriously he’s being considered. It’d be highly unusual for the White House to elevate an FBI agent to the role of director, and McCabe during a Senate hearing last week broke with the White House’s explanations for Comey’s firing and its dismissive characterization of the Russia investigation. FBI directors have predominantly been drawn from the ranks of prosecutors and judges. Comey, for instance, was a former United States Attorney in Manhattan before being appointed deputy attorney general by George W. Bush. His predecessor, Robert Mueller, was U. S. attorney in San Francisco. One contender who could prove politically palatable is Michael Garcia, a former U. S. attorney in Manhattan with significant experience in terrorism and public corruption investigations. He was appointed by FIFA in 2012 to investigate World Cup bidding contests, then resigned after he said the global soccer organization had mischaracterized a lengthy investigative report he had produced. The FBI Agents Association has endorsed former Republican congressman Mike Rogers, an ex-FBI agent who led the House intelligence committee and had collegial relationships with his Democratic counterparts. The association also endorsed him in 2013 before Comey was picked. Senate Democrats have insisted that Trump should not pick a politician as the next FBI director. Minority Leader Chuck Schumer of New York said on NBC’s “Meet the Press” on Sunday that the choice should be “certainly somebody not of a partisan background, certainly somebody of great experience and certainly somebody of courage.” Given the partisan uproar over Comey’s firing, Democrats seem unlikely to support any FBI candidate put forward by Trump. But the nominee will require only a simple majority vote in the 100-member Senate, meaning Republicans can use their 52-48 majority to confirm the next director without needing Democratic votes. Democrats are demanding appointment of a special prosecutor to investigate Russia’s involvement in the 2016 election and ties to Trump’s campaign, and have discussed trying to slow down the confirmation process or other business of the Senate as a way of drawing attention to the demand. Senate rules requiring unanimous consent or 60-vote thresholds on various procedural or legislative steps give Democrats the ability to slow the Senate to a crawl and delay committee hearings. Given the Republicans’ narrow Senate majority, the larger consideration for the White House is that some GOP senators also insist on a non-partisan choice as the next FBI director. GOP Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina said on “Meet the Press” that Trump has is obligated “to pick somebody beyond reproach outside the political lane.” Graham said under the circumstances he wouldn’t be able to support his colleague Sen. John Cornyn of Texas, the No. 2 Senate Republican, who is under consideration. Some House Republicans, who technically have no role in the pick, have spoken out about the need for non-partisanship and independence. “The FBI is America’s pre-eminent law enforcement agency. As such, it needs to be led by a person of unquestioned character and completely divorced from partisan politics, ” GOP Rep. Tom Cole of Oklahoma wrote in an opinion column circulated Monday. House Democrats are weighing their own steps related to the firing. Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi is asking House Speaker Paul Ryan to join in a call for Rosenstein to brief House members, as he will do for senators Thursday. Democrats will also try to use a procedural maneuver to force a vote on legislation calling for an independent commission to investigate Russian election interference, although they’re unlikely to prevail. Copyright 2017 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

© Source: http://www.cbs46.com/story/35427227/trump-gop-control-fbi-chief-pick-despite-democrats-calls
All rights are reserved and belongs to a source media.

China pays for Windows XP addiction as 'WannaCry' hits

0

The WannaCry ransomware has wormed its way into tens of thousands of Windows PCs in China, where Windows XP remains relatively popular.
The WannaCry ransomware has wormed its way into tens of thousands of Windows PCs in China, where Windows XP runs one in five systems, local reports said Monday.
More than 23,000 IP addresses in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) show signs of infection, the country’s National Computer Network Emergency Response Technical Team/Coordination Center (CNCERT) told Xinhua, the state-run news agency, on Monday.
“Intranets in many industries and enterprises involving banking, education, electricity, energy, healthcare and transportation have been affected in different extents, ” CNCERT said.
The Hong Kong-based Southern China Morning Post upped the ante in its report Monday, claiming that tens of thousands of businesses and organizations had been hit by the ransomware, which has been dubbed “WannaCry” by most security experts, “WannaCrypt” by a few outliers.
The China National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC) , for example, took some 20,000 gas stations offline early Saturday, forcing customers to pay in cash as credit card purchases could not be processed. By mid-day Sunday, some 20% of the stations were still disconnected from the Internet, but efforts were continuing to restore payment options, the company said in a statement.
It shouldn’t have been a surprise that PCs in the PRC were hit hard by WannaCry: Although security experts have yet to identify the original infection vector, the ransomware spreads rapidly by exploiting Windows vulnerabilities in a baked-in file sharing protocol.
Microsoft patched the flaws in March when it issued MS17-010, one of its last-ever security bulletins. But because Microsoft only supports — patches, in other words — newer editions of its operating system, the 16-year-old Windows XP and the 5-year-old Windows 8 were not bolstered with the same fix.
China is at greater risk of attacks against unpatched Windows XP PCs than most countries because a larger percentage of the nation’s systems run the obsolete OS than the global average.
According to Baidu, the PRC’s largest search provider, 19% of all personal computers using its service last month were powered by Windows XP. That was almost double the share of Windows 10, but less than a third of the share of Windows 7.
Windows XP’s worldwide share was about 7% in April, said U. S. analytics vendor Net Applications earlier this month, about one-fourth the share of Windows 10 and a seventh the share of Windows 7.
Over the weekend, Microsoft issued security updates for Windows 8, Windows Server 2003 and Windows XP, which had been banished from the patch list one, two and three years ago, respectively. “This decision was made based on an assessment of this situation, with the principle of protecting our customer ecosystem overall, firmly in mind, ” Phillip Misner, a principal security group manager at the Microsoft Security Response Center (MSRM) , said in a post to a company blog.
Misner’s post included links customers can click to download the appropriate patch for their older PC or server. Newer versions of Windows can be inoculated against WannaCry by running Windows Update and applying all outstanding patches.

© Source: http://www.computerworld.com/article/3196990/windows-pcs/china-pays-for-windows-xp-addiction-as-wannacry-hits.html
All rights are reserved and belongs to a source media.

Travel ban judges scrutinize Trump’s campaign statements

0

Dozens of advocates for refugees and immigrants rallied outside the federal courthouse in Seattle, some carrying “No Ban, No Wall” signs.
Federal judges on Monday peppered a lawyer for President Donald Trump with questions about whether the administration’s travel ban discriminates against Muslims and zeroed in on the president’s campaign statements, the second time in a week the rhetoric has faced judicial scrutiny.
Acting Solicitor General Jeffrey Wall, who is defending the travel ban, told a three-judge panel of the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals that “over time, the president clarified that what he was talking about was Islamic terrorist groups and the countries that sponsor or shelter them.” He argued that the executive order halting travel from six majority-Muslim nations doesn’t say anything about religion, and neither the state of Hawaii nor an imam from that state who wants his mother-in-law to visit has standing to sue.
“This order is aimed at aliens abroad, who themselves don’t have constitutional rights, ” Wall said in a hearing broadcast live on C-Span and other news stations.
Neal Katyal, who represented Hawaii, scoffed at that argument and said Trump had repeatedly spoke of a Muslim ban during the presidential campaign and after.
“This is a repeated pattern of the president, ” Katyal said.
The 9th Circuit panel was hearing arguments over Hawaii’s lawsuit challenging the travel ban, which would suspend the nation’s refugee program and temporarily bar new visas for citizens of Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen. The judges will decide whether to uphold a Hawaii judge’s decision in March that blocked the ban.
Dozens of advocates for refugees and immigrants rallied outside the federal courthouse in Seattle, some carrying “No Ban, No Wall” signs.
Last week, judges on the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals heard arguments over whether to affirm a Maryland judge’s decision putting the ban on ice. They also questioned whether they could consider Trump’s campaign statements, with one judge asking if there was anything other than “willful blindness” that would prevent them from doing so.
On Monday, Judge Richard Paez questioned Katyal about Trumps statements, calling them “profound.” But the judge wondered whether Trump is forever forbidden from adopting an executive order along the lines of his travel ban.
Katyal said no, and suggested the president could work with Congress on legitimate measures.
Monday’s arguments mark the second time Trump’s efforts to restrict immigration from certain Muslim-majority nations have reached the San Francisco-based 9th Circuit.
After Trump issued his initial travel ban on a Friday in late January, bringing chaos and protests to airports around the country, a Seattle judge blocked its enforcement nationwide — a decision that was unanimously upheld by a three-judge 9th Circuit panel.
The president then rewrote his executive order, rather than appeal to the U. S. Supreme Court, and in March, U. S. District Judge Derrick Watson in Honolulu blocked the new version from taking effect, citing what he called “significant and unrebutted evidence of religious animus” in Trump’s campaign statements.
“Again, in this court, the President claims a nearly limitless power to make immigration policy that is all but immune from judicial review, ” Hawaii Attorney General Douglas Chin wrote to the 9th Circuit. “Again, he must be checked.”
The administration’s lawyers are seeking to persuade the judges that the lower court’s decision is “fundamentally wrong, ” and that the president’s order falls squarely within his duty to secure the nation’s borders. The order as written is silent on religion, and neither Hawaii nor its co-plaintiff, the imam of the Muslim Association of Hawaii, has standing to sue, they say — arguments that were rejected in the lower court.
The travel ban cases are expected to reach the Supreme Court, but that would likely be cemented if the 4th and 9th Circuits reach differing conclusions about its legality. Because of how the courts chose to proceed, a full slate of 13 judges heard the 4th Circuit arguments last week, while just three, all appointees of President Bill Clinton, will sit in Seattle.
For that reason — with the possibility for myriad concurring or dissenting opinions — it could take the 4th Circuit longer to rule, noted Carl Tobias, a law professor at University of Richmond law school in Virginia.

© Source: http://www.cnbc.com/2017/05/15/travel-ban-judges-scrutinize-trumps-campaign-statements.html
All rights are reserved and belongs to a source media.

Trump's youngest son to attend Maryland school

0

Donald Trump’s youngest son Barron will attend a private school in Maryland after he and his mother move into the White House this summer, the first lady…
Donald Trump’s youngest son Barron will attend a private school in Maryland after he and his mother move into the White House this summer, the first lady announced Monday.
The announcement will likely save New York tens of thousands of dollars a day in police costs incurred by 11-year-old Barron and his mother Melania remaining in Manhattan while he finishes the semester at his current school.
While it was still not immediately clear when the president’s wife and youngest son would relocate to Washington, the school year at St Andrew’s starts September 5. The current school term is due to end next month.
In making the announcement, the first lady said St Andrew’s Episcopal School, 20 miles (32 kilometers) from the White House, was noted for “its diverse community and commitment to academic excellence.”
“The mission of St Andrew’s is ‘to know and inspire each child in an inclusive community dedicated to exceptional teaching, learning and service, ‘ all of which appealed to our family, ” she said.
Barron Trump is the first presidential child to attend the school, where fees start at $23,490 for pre-Kindergarten through $40,650 for grades nine to 12.
Bill Clinton and Barack Obama, the two previous US presidents with school-age children in the White House, instead chose the private Sidwell Friends School in Washington.
St Andrew’s has 580 students, with an average student-teacher ratio of seven to one, according to its website.
The costs of protecting the first lady and her son have been hugely unpopular in New York, a largely Democratic-voting city.
Officials estimate it costs $127,000 to $146,000 a day to protect Trump’s family, which includes his eldest sons Donald Jr and Eric, who run the family business.
More than half a million people signed a petition demanding the first lady move into the White House or foot the expense of living in New York herself.

© Source: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/wires/afp/article-4508560/Trumps-youngest-son-attend-Maryland-school.html?ITO=1490&ns_mchannel=rss&ns_campaign=1490
All rights are reserved and belongs to a source media.

How to Protect and Recover Your Business from Ransomware

0

Your business has been infected by ransomware. Now what? Follow these five steps to recovery and staying safe.
The US is bracing for the full impact of a global ransomware epidemic based on the Wanna Decryptor malware strain. It’s important to protect your business and data from this fast-spreading threat, but once we’re past it, you need to remember that Wanna Decryptor is only the noisiest example of the ransomware problem.
There are three things to know about ransomware: it’s scary, it’s growing fast, and it’s big business. According to the FBI’s Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3) , more than 992 CryptoWall-related complaints were received between April 2014 and June 2015, resulting in more than $18 million in losses. That malignant success is reflected in ransomware’s growth rate with the Infoblox DNS Threat Index, reporting a 35-fold increase in new domains created for ransomware in the first quarter of 2016 (as compared to the fourth quarter of 2015) .
In general, ransomware drops an encrypted wall between a business and the internal data and applications that business needs to operate. But these attacks can be far more serious than simply the inaccessibility of the data. If you’re not prepared, then your business could grind to a halt.
Just ask Hollywood Presbyterian Medical Center. Long before Wanna Decryptor, the hospital learned a painful lesson when staff lost access to their PCs during a ransomware outbreak early in 2016. The hospital paid the $17,000 ransom after employees spent 10 days relying on fax machines and paper charts. Or ask the Tewksbury Police Department. In April of 2015, they paid the ransom to regain access to encrypted arrest and incident records.
If there’s a silver lining to Wanna Decryptor at any level, then it’s that it serves to prove, without a doubt, that the threat presented by ransomware is real. No business or employee is immune from a potential ransomware attack. It’s important to understand how ransomware infects computers before discussing how to protect your business from it or how to respond if you’re compromised. Understanding the origin and mode of infection provides insights into staying safe.
Ransomware typically comes from one of two sources: compromised websites and email attachments. A legitimate website that has been compromised can host an exploit kit that infects your machine, typically through a browser exploit. The same methodology can be used by a phishing website. A drive-by download installs ransomware and it begins encrypting your files.
In the case of a malicious email attachment, users are tricked into opening the attachment, which then installs ransomware. This can be as simple as a fake email message with an executable attachment, an infected Microsoft Word file that tricks you into enabling macros, or a file with a renamed extension such as a file that ends in “PDF” but is really an EXE file (an executable) .
“In both of these cases, some kind of social engineering is used to lure the user into infecting themselves, ” says Luis Corrons, PandaLabs Technical Director at Panda Security . “This provides businesses with a great opportunity to educate their users to avoid these risks but, unfortunately, most small businesses neglect this and miss out on the chance to save themselves a big headache.”
Currently, there’s no silver bullet to ensure your organization’s safety from ransomware. But there are five steps every business should take that can drastically reduce their chances of infection—and also ease the pain should an attack succeed.
A key component to prepare for a ransomware attack is developing a robust backup strategy and making regular backups. “Robust backups are a key component of an anti-ransomware strategy, ” said Philip Casesa, Product Development Strategist at ISC2, a global not-for-profit organization that certifies security professionals. “Once your files are encrypted, your only viable option is to restore the backup. Your other options are to pay the ransom or lose the data.”
“You have to have some sort of backup, a real backup solution of the assets you’ve determined are essential to your business, ” continued Casesa. “Real-time backup or file synch will just back up your encrypted files. You need a robust backup process where you can roll back a few days [to before the ransomware infection] , and restore local and server apps and data.”
Panda Security’s Corrons offers a further caution: backups “are critical in case your defenses fail but be sure to have removed the ransomware completely before restoring backups. At PandaLabs, we’ve seen ransomware encrypt backup files.”
A good strategy to consider is a tiered or distributed backup solution that keeps several copies of backup files in different locations and on different media (so an infected node doesn’t immediately have access to both current file repositories and backup archives) . Such solutions are available from several small to midsize business (SMB) online backup vendors as well as most Disaster-Recovery-as-a-Service (DRaaS) vendors.
As previously mentioned, user education is a powerful yet frequently overlooked weapon in your arsenal against ransomware. Train users to recognize social engineering techniques, avoid clickbait, and never open an attachment from someone they don’t know. Attachments from people they know should be viewed and opened with caution.
“Understanding how ransomware spreads identifies the user behaviors that need to be modified in order to protect your business, ” said Casesa. “Email attachments are the number one risk for infection, drive-by downloads are number two, and malicious links in email are number three. Humans play a significant factor in getting infected with ransomware.”
Training users to consider the ransomware threat is easier than you think, especially for SMBs. Sure, it can take the traditional form of a lengthy in-house seminar, but it can also simply be a series of group lunches at which IT gets the chance to inform users via interactive discussion—for the low price of a few pizzas. You might even consider hiring an outside security consultant to deliver the training, with some supplementary video or real-world examples.
The best place to start protecting your SMB from ransomware is with these Top Four Mitigation Strategies: app whitelisting, patching apps, patching operating systems (OSes) , and minimizing administrative privileges. Casesa was quick to point out that “these four controls take care of 85 percent or more of malware threats.”
For SMBs that still rely on individual PC antivirus (AV) for security, moving to a managed endpoint security solution lets IT centralize security for the entire organization and take full control of these measures. That can drastically increase AV and anti-malware effectiveness.
Whichever solution you choose, make sure that it includes behavior-based protections. All three of our experts agreed that signature-based anti-malware isn’t effective against modern software threats.
By paying criminals, you’re giving them an incentive and the means to develop better ransomware. “If you pay, you make it that much worse for everyone else, ” says Casesa. “The bad guys use your money to develop nastier malware and infect others.”
Protecting future victims may not be top-of-mind when you’re trying to run a business with its data held hostage, but just look at it from this perspective: that next victim could be you all over again, this time fighting even more effective malware that you helped pay to develop.
Casesa points out that “by paying the ransom, you’ve now become a riper target for the criminals because they know you’ll pay.” You become, in sales parlance, a qualified lead. Just as there is no honor among thieves, there is no guarantee that the ransomware will be completely removed. The criminal has access to your machine, and can unencrypt your files and leave the malware on it to monitor your activities and steal additional information.
If the damage caused by ransomware is all about disruption to your business, then why not take steps to increase business continuity by moving to the cloud? “The level of protection and overall security you get from the cloud is far greater than what a small business could afford yourself, ” points out Brandon Dunlap, Global CISO of Black & Veatch . “Cloud providers have malware scanning, enhanced authentication, and numerous other protections that make the odds of them suffering from a ransomware attack very low.”
At the very least, move email servers to the cloud. Dunlap points out that “email is a huge attack vector for ransomware. Move that to the cloud where providers bundle multiple security controls like malware scanning and DLP [Data Loss Prevention] into the service.” Additional security layers, such as proxy-based site reputation and traffic scanning, can be added through many cloud services and can further limit your exposure to ransomware.
Dunlap is enthusiastic about the protections the cloud offers against ransomware. “We’re at a fantastic moment in technology history with a multitude of low-friction solutions to many of the problems faced by small business, ” said Dunlap. “This makes small businesses more nimble from an IT perspective.”
If your local machine becomes infected with ransomware, it may not even matter if your data is in the cloud. Wipe your local machine, re-image it, reconnect to your cloud services, and you’re back in business.
This is not one of those situations in which a wait-and-see approach is your best tactic. Wanna Decryptor clearly shows that ransomware is out there; it’s growing in giant leaps and bounds, both in sophistication and bad guy popularity—and it’s definitely looking for you. Even after this current threat blows over, it’s critically important that you take steps to protect data and endpoints from infection.
Create regular backups, train employees to avoid infection, patch apps and OSes, limit administrator privileges, and run non-signature-based anti-malware software. If you follow this advice, then you can prevent all but the most bleeding-edge infections (and those likely aren’t targeting SMBs) . In the case in which an attack gets through your defenses, have a clear, tested plan in place for IT to clean up the infection, restore backups, and resume normal business operations.
If you don’t follow these best practices and you do get infected, then know that paying the ransom comes with no guarantees, qualifies you as a sucker to the criminals, and gives them the means to develop even more insidious ransomware (and the incentive to use it on you as often as possible) . Don’t be a victim. Instead, take the time now to reap the benefits later: prepare, prevent, protect, and stay productive.

© Source: http://uk.pcmag.com/feature/82500/how-to-protect-and-recover-your-business-from-ransomware
All rights are reserved and belongs to a source media.

Timeline words data