Leader: Trump and an age of disorder The Women's March against Trump matters – but only if we keep fighting
The US presidency has not always been held by men of distinction and honour, but Donald Trump is by some distance its least qualified occupant. The leader of the world’s sole superpower has no record of political or military service and is ignorant of foreign affairs. Throughout his campaign, he repeatedly showed himself to be a racist, a misogynist, a braggart and a narcissist.
The naive hope that Mr Trump’s victory would herald a great moderation was dispelled by his conduct during the transition. He compared his country’s intelligence services to those of Nazi Germany and repeatedly denied Russian interference in the election. He derided Nato as “obsolete” and predicted the demise of the European Union. He reaffirmed his commitment to dismantling Obamacare and to overturning Roe v Wade. He doled out jobs to white nationalists, protectionists and family members. He denounced US citizens for demonstrating against him. Asked whether he regretted any part of his vulgar campaign, he replied: “No, I won.”
Of all his predilections, Mr Trump’s affection for Vladimir Putin is perhaps the most troubling. When the 2012 Republican presidential nominee, Mitt Romney, warned that Russia was the “number one geopolitical foe” of the US, he was mocked by Barack Obama. Yet his remark proved prescient. Rather than regarding Mr Putin as a foe, however, Mr Trump fetes him as a friend. The Russian president aims to use the US president’s goodwill to secure the removal of American sanctions, recognition of Russia’s annexation of Crimea and respect for the murderous reign of the Syrian president, Bashar al-Assad. He has a worryingly high chance of success.
Whether or not Mr Trump has personal motives for his fealty (as a lurid security dossier alleges), he and Mr Putin share a political outlook. Both men desire a world in which “strongmen” are free to abuse their citizens’ human rights without fear of external rebuke. Mr Trump’s refusal to commit to Nato’s principle of collective defence provides Mr Putin with every incentive to pursue his expansionist desires. The historic achievement of peace and stability in eastern Europe is in danger.
As he seeks reconciliation with Russia, Mr Trump is simultaneously pursuing conflict with China. He broke with precedent by speaking on the telephone with the Taiwanese president, Tsai Ing-wen, and used Twitter to berate the Chinese government. Rex Tillerson, Mr Trump’s secretary of state nominee, has threatened an American blockade of the South China Sea islands.
Mr Trump’s disregard for domestic and international norms represents an unprecedented challenge to established institutions. The US constitution, with its separation of powers, was designed to restrain autocrats such as the new president. Yet, in addition to the White House, the Republicans also control Congress and two-thirds of governorships and state houses. Mr Trump’s first Supreme Court appointment will ensure a conservative judicial majority. The decline of established print titles and the growth of “fake news” weaken another source of accountability.
In these circumstances, there is a heightened responsibility on the US’s allies to challenge, rather than to indulge, Mr Trump. Angela Merkel’s warning that co-operation was conditional on his respect for liberal and democratic values was a model of the former. Michael Gove’s obsequious interview with Mr Trump was a dismal example of the latter.
Theresa May has rightly rebuked the president for his treatment of women and has toughened Britain’s stance against Russian revanchism. Yet, although the UK must maintain working relations with the US, she should not allow the prospect of a future trade deal to skew her attitude towards Mr Trump. Any agreement is years away and the president’s protectionist proclivities could yet thwart British hopes of a beneficial outcome.
The diplomatic and political conventions embodied by the “special relationship” have endured for more than seven decades. However, Mr Trump’s election may necessitate their demise. It was the belief that the UK must stand “shoulder to shoulder” with the US that led Tony Blair into the ruinous Iraq War. In this new age of disorder, Western leaders must avoid being willing accomplices to Mr Trump’s agenda. Intense scepticism, rather than sycophancy, should define their response.
Arron Banks, UKIP-funder, Brexit cheerleader and Gibraltar-based insurance salesman, took time out from Trump’s inauguration to tweet me about my role in tomorrow’s Women’s March “ Conservative values are in the ascendancy worldwide. Thankfully your values are finished. . good ”.
Just what about the idea of women and men marching for human rights causes such ill will? The sense it is somehow cheeky to say we will champion equality whoever is in office in America – or around the world. After all, if progressives like me have lost the battle of ideas, what difference does it make whether we are marching, holding meetings or just moaning on the internet?
The only anti-democratic perspective is to argue that when someone has lost the argument they have to stop making one. When political parties lose elections they reflect, they listen, they learn – but if they stand for something, they don’t disband. The same is true, now, for the broader context. We should not dismiss the necessity to learn, to listen, to reflect on the rise of Trump – or indeed reflect on the rise of the right in the UK – but reject the idea that we have to take a vow of silence if we want to win power again.
To march is not to ignore the challenges progressives face. It is to start to ask what are we prepared to do about it.
Historically, conservatives have had no such qualms about regrouping and remaining steadfast in the confidence they have something worth saying. In contrast, the left has always been good at absolving itself of the need to renew.
We spend our time seeking the “ perfect ” candidates, the “ perfect ” policy, the “ perfect campaign ” , as a precondition for action. It justifies doing nothing – except sitting on the sidelines bemoaning the state of society.
We also seem to think that changing the world should be easier than reality suggests. The backlash we are now seeing against progressive policies was inevitable once we appeared to take these gains for granted – and became arrogant and exclusive about the inevitability of our worldview. Our values demand the rebalancing of power, whether economic, social or cultural, and that means challenging those who currently have it. We may believe that a more equal world is one in which more will thrive, but that doesn’t mean those with entrenched privilege will give up their favoured status without a fight – or that the public should express perpetual gratitude for our efforts via the ballot box either.
Amongst the conferences, tweets and general rumblings there seem three schools of thought about what to do next. The first is Marxist – as in Groucho – revisionism: to rise again we must water down our principles to accommodate where we believe the centre ground of politics to now be. Tone down our ideals in the hope that by such acquiescence we can eventually win back public support for our brand – if not our purpose. The very essence of a hollow victory.
The second is to stick to our guns and stick our heads in the sand, believing that eventually, when World War Three breaks out, the public will come grovelling back to us. To luxuriate in an unwillingness to see we are losing not just elected offices but the fight for our shared future.
But what if there really was a third way? It’s not going to be easy, and it requires more than a hashtag or funny t-shirt. It’s about picking ourselves up, dusting ourselves down and starting to renew our call to arms in a way that makes sense for the modern world.
For the avoidance of doubt, if we march tomorrow and then go home satisfied we have made our point then we may as well not have marched at all. But if we march and continue to organise out of the networks we make, well, then that’s worth a Saturday in the cold. After all, we won’t win the battle of ideas, if we don’t battle.
We do have to change the way we work. We do have to have the courage not to live in our echo chambers alone. To go with respect and humility to debate and discuss the future of our communities and of our country.
And we have to come together to show there is a willingness not to ask a few brave souls to do that on their own. Not just at election times, but every day and in every corner of Britain, no matter how difficult it may feel.
Saturday is one part of that process of finding others willing not just to walk a mile with a placard, but to put in the hard yards to win the argument again for progressive values and vision. Maybe no one will show up. Maybe not many will keep going. But whilst there are folk with faith in each other, and in that alternative future, they’ll find a friend in me ready to work with them and will them on – and then Mr Banks really should be worried.
© Source: http://www.newstatesman.com/culture/2017/01/leader-trump-and-age-disorder
All rights are reserved and belongs to a source media.
Catherine Howden of the Georgia Emergency Management Agency said the deaths occurred in Cook, Brooks and Berrien counties in southern Georgia near the Georgia-Florida line. 
Od soboty aplikacja mobilna banku Citi Handlowego umożliwia logowanie odciskiem palca dla urządzeń z systemem Android. Do tej pory oprogramowanie banku pozwalało na logowanie w ten sposób tylko w systemach iOS (stosowanym w urządzeniach Apple’a). 
Zmiana ordynacji wyborczej była jednym z głównych tematów spotkania Jarosława Kaczyńskiego z działaczami Prawa i Sprawiedliwości w Opolu. Jak poinformowała partia na swoim profilu na Twitterze, prezes podkreślił konieczność niezwłocznego podjęcia działań, które pozwolą dobrze przygotować wybory samorządowe.
W ramach nowego pakietu cyfrowych stacji naziemnych pod koniec ubiegłego roku ruszyły już cztery należące do nadawców prywatnych (Zoom TV, Nova TV, Metro TV i WP). Do pełni oferty brakuje jednak trzech (lub dwóch, gdyby jeden miał być nadawany w wysokiej rozdzielczości, czyli HD) kanałów TVP. Zarząd TVP postawił start tych stacji pod znakiem zapytania, włączając je do listy inwestycji, z których będzie zmuszony w tym roku zrezygnować, jeśli politycy nie zapewnią TVP wyższych wpływów z abonamentu. 
Aachen. Der britische Historiker Timothy Garton Ash erhält für seinen Anstoß zu einer Wertedebatte in der europäischen Krise den Karlspreis 2017. Der herausragende Wissenschaftler sei ein überzeugender und bedeutender englischer Europäer und europäischer Engländer, erklärte das Karlspreis-Direktorium in Aachen. Die Verleihung soll am 25. Mai im Krönungssaal des Aachener Rathauses stattfinden. 
Nach 3:34 Stunden war die Sensation perfekt! Die Nummer 1 der Welt, Andy Murray (29), ist bei den Australian Open ausgeschieden. Geschlagen von einem außerhalb der Szene unbekannten Deutschen, dem die großen Erfolge noch fehlen: Mischa Zverev (29). 7:5, 5:7, 6:2, 6:4 hieß es am Ende. 
In Washington können so viele Menschen demonstrieren, wie sie wollen. So lange die Demokraten nicht wieder Wahlen gewinnen, werden Trump und Gleichgesinnte an der Regierung bleiben.
Kamil Stoch znów najlepszy! Gratulujemy! — napisał na Twitterze prezydent, któremu w Zakopanem towarzyszyła małżonka Agata Kornhauser-Duda. W wywiadzie dla prezydent Duda przyznał, że przeżywał na skoczni bardzo duże emocje. Jesteśmy bardzo szczęśliwi. Myślę, że wszyscy jesteśmy bardzo szczęśliwi: i ci którzy są tutaj na skoczni, i ci którzy widzieli konkurs za pośrednictwem telewizji. Były emocje wielkie ale wszystko skończyło się pięknie. Kamil Stoch zwyciężył, nasz mistrz. Jesteśmy bardzo szczęśliwi, jest pięknie” — mówił. Prezydent zauważył, że wyniki osiągane przez Kamila Stocha to efekt jego ciężkiej pracy. Są faworyci, są lepsze, gorsze dni, dużo szczęścia, ale przede wszystkim umiejętności, talent, ciężka praca. To panu Kamilowi procentuje. Miałem tą wielką przyjemność, że mogłem go uścisnąć, wręczyć mu puchar” — powiedział. Andrzej Duda chwalił również kibiców zgromadzonych pod skocznią w Zakopanem oraz organizację zawodów. Kibice są wspaniali. Przyjechali z całej Polski. To jest żywioł. Jestem wdzięczny wszystkim, że tchnęli ducha w te zawody, a przede wszystkim w naszych zawodników” — podkreślił. Umiemy robić piękne wydarzenia, mamy świetnych zawodników, jest naprawdę dobrze” — dodał. Kamil Stoch wygrywając niedzielny konkurs w Zakopanem odniósł 20. w karierze indywidualne zwycięstwo w zawodach Pucharu Świata. Na Wielkiej Krokwi był najlepszy po raz czwarty. Dzięki temu Polak umocnił się na pozycji lidera Pucharu Świata. Ma 130 pkt przewagi nad drugim w tej klasyfikacji Norwegiem Danielem Andre Tande, który był tym razem siódmy, oraz 153 nad a zajmującym trzecie miejsce, a dziewiątym w niedzielę, Słoweńcem Domen Prevcem. Na drugiej pozycji uplasował się na Wielkiej Krokwi Niemiec Andreas Wellinger, a na trzeciej jego rodak Richard Freitag. ansa/
Washington (CNN) Prime real estate in the Trump White House, hiccups and help in filling important jobs, making sure agencies know who is boss — and a big question for the now former President Barack Obama. It’s all part of the Inside Politics forecast.
