According to the statement, Moscow and Beijing urge all those involved in the system’s deployment to consider the escalation in tensions it would lead to, and to exercise restraint. But the two also reaffirm their commitment to a nuclear-free North Korea, and believe diplomacy should be the way forward.
The statement comes shortly after a Thursday meeting co-chaired by Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Igor Morgulov and Chinese Assistant Foreign Minister Kong Xuanyou.
The Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) system is to be deployed on a golf course in South Korea, prompting worries from Russia and China about their security being compromised by the anti-missile system’s powerful radar.
One of the concerns the two have with the US system is its radar’s ability to peer into Russian and Chinese territory.
The decision to deploy was first announced in July, promising a system by the end of the year. This led to strong opposition from Russia and China, as well as a 100,000-strong petition by American activists urging the US to reconsider. Reassuring people that the system would “not undermine China’s or Russia’s strategic deterrent,” the Obama administration shot the petition down.
The thinking over the summer was that the North Korean threat to its southern neighbor must be kept in check. Pyongyang’s rising number of ICBM tests and its escalating rhetoric against Seoul contributed to this. Brushing aside criticism by China and Russia, Washington said that its hardware in Korea will be focused “solely” on countering the North Korean nuclear and ballistic missile threat.
Less than a week ago, Seoul reaffirmed its commitment to deploying THAAD, leading to another chorus of protest from Beijing, which complained that it “repeatedly expressed” its concerns, and that the system was “no good to peace and stability on the Korean Peninsula.”
“We also hope that a proper solution that accommodates each other’s concerns can be found through communication and consultation between China and the ROK,” Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Geng Shuang also told journalists at the briefing.
Seoul responded almost immediately by saying that THAAD deployment is “a sovereign and self-defensive measure.”
South Korea has also complained about China taking what it sees as “retaliatory measures” over the decision to deploy. These included a partial ban on Korean TV, as well as some pop artists. The automotive industry was also targeted, and an investigation was launched into Korean retail giant Lotte, which does business in China.
Once again this Thursday, South Korea warned that it may complain to China over the effect its indirect response to THAAD has had: “We plan to present the relation between China’s actions that have been pointed out by our companies and the THAAD deployment during a meeting on Friday regarding the free trade agreement between South Korea and China,” Trade Minister Joo Hyung-hwan told parliament.

© Source: https://www.rt.com/news/373549-russia-china-us-korea/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=RSS
All rights are reserved and belongs to a source media.

Ecstatic Koreans tried to hand him bouquets of flowers and shake his hands as he made his way through a human tunnel that literally collapsed around him as he tried to exit the airport. The crowd looked so tight at times that the 72-year-old may have been unable to lift an arm to offer those greatly desired handshakes.
Many people were there to cheer Ban on to the South Korean presidency — an office he has yet to officially say he’s seeking. But he again hinted at the prospect in an address to his fans after arriving in the terminal.
Ban said a decision would be coming soon about how he plans to serve his country. If the turnout at the airport is any indication of support, Ban won’t be lacking advocates if he runs.
One of Ban’s fan clubs, Bansamo, which literally means “a group that loves Ban,” was there to cheer on their returning champion.
“We came here because Ban did something great for the world and now is coming back. So we came here to welcome him,” said Kang Seok-jun, the head of Bansamo.
Kang said they founded the group in 2010 solely to support the UN secretary general, and Bansamo is “pure” without political or religious bias.
Ban has long enjoyed support at home. He rose from poverty as a young man to become leader of the UN. South Korea’s own improbable growth runs parallel to his success.
Aidan Foster-Carter, an Honorary Senior Research Fellow in Sociology and Modern Korea at Leeds University, said Ban’s humble roots may help a bid for the Blue House.
But he believes it’s Ban’s image as an outsider that’s driving his current popularity.
“There’s a kind of yearning for a white knight, somebody who is thought to be outside the system and unsullied,” said Foster-Carter.
“There doesn’t seem to be an issue that he wasn’t a particularly good UN secretary general, and he certainly has his critics. He is his own guy, he’s famous, he’s known, and he’s allegedly not corrupted.”
Ban was quick to address corruption once back home. During his airport address, he said there’s no truth to rumors now circulating about him in the press.
Rhee Jong-hoon, a political commentator at iGM Consulting, said the allegations could damage a campaign. But they’re not “crucial faults” when compared to other South Korean presidential candidates who have fought through similar allegations.
“The most important thing about unfavorable factors is how frankly and well he explains them. We have to see how it goes,” said Rhee.
Ban also faces scrutiny from fractured political parties hoping the well-liked diplomat will bear their flag as a presidential candidate.
Currently, Ban has no party to call home; Foster-Carter called him a centrist. He served as foreign minister under a liberal administration. Lately, he’s been courted by parties on both sides, including the ruling Saenuri Party and its defectors , the new Barun Party.
Some political analysts suggest he may create his own party. Others say it’s too late considering their may be a special election in the coming months to replace impeached President Park Geun-hye.
South Korea’s opposition, meanwhile, has a strong candidate in Moon Jae-in, the former head of the Democratic People’s Party who lost the 2012 election to Pres. Park.
It’s this tug-of-war over the famous Ban that may draw the 72-year-old into a race for the presidency in a country facing political and economic crises.
“There has been a common view that Ban is the conservative camp’s hope. He seems to have accepted their view,” said Rhee.
Foster-Carter said people have a sense that if someone “tells you you’re their country’s savior, it must be a pretty siren song.”
He also agreed the frayed party lines encourage a run.
“It helps the conservatives don’t really have any particular any good or prominent candidates anymore, do they? Whereas the liberals have got quite a few,” Foster-Carter said. “So all that sort of means he’s the man of the moment, isn’t he? Ban the man.”

© Source: http://thediplomat.com/2017/01/ban-ki-moon-south-koreas-white-knight/
All rights are reserved and belongs to a source media.