Array
A federal district court has rejected Joe Biden’s scheme to simply change federal law by redefining „sex“ to mean „gender ID,“ „sexual orientation“ or a myriad other alternatives that contemporary society has created.
The ruling will protect not only female athletes but also doctors who have been under attack by the Biden administration as it tries to vastly expand the reach of the very narrow Bostock decision that allows same-sex „marriages.“
„In his Bostock dissent, Justice Alito foresaw how litigants would stretch the majority opinion like an elastic blanket to cover categories, cases, and controversies expressly not decided,“ the opinion from the court in Amarillo, Texas, said.
Alita had warned courts would be „mired for years“ in fights about the reach of the court’s ruling.
„And here we are…“ the district court said.
Officials with the ADF, which had filed in support of the athletes and doctors, said it is a victory for them.
WND is now on Trump’s Truth Social! Follow us @WNDNews
„In Neese v. Becerra, two Texas-based physicians are challenging the administration’s mandate in Section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act that forces health care professionals to perform harmful medical procedures that seek to alter a patient’s biological sex even if the procedure violates the doctor’s medical judgment or religious beliefs,“ the ADF explained. „That mandate depends on Title IX, a federal statute that the administration is also attempting to interpret to require women to compete against men on women’s sports teams. In its ruling Friday, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Amarillo Division, determined that ‚because Title IX does not protect ’sexual orientation‘ or ‚gender identity‘ status, neither does Section 1557.
