The revived case could have a major impact on the continued debate over broadband regulations and net neutrality.
A federal appeals court said Tuesday that it plans to review a ruling it delivered last year, when it threw out a Federal Trade Commission lawsuit against AT&T Mobility for throttling the speeds of its unlimited data customers.
The case could have significant implications for the debate over net neutrality and the oversight of internet service providers.
In a suit filed in 2014, the FTC charged the cellular giant misled its customers about its unlimited data plans. However, last year, a three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed the case. Now, an 11-judge panel will review the case.
In last year’s ruling, the court panel ruled that AT&T should be exempt from all FTC regulatory oversight because it qualifies as a common carrier.
Before 2015, the FTC regulated internet service providers (ISPs) like AT&T and Verizon, but the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in 2015 ruled that ISPs qualify as common carriers under Title II of the 1934 Communications Act.
Congress bars the FTC from regulating common carriers, but the agency continued to regulate “non-common carrier” services provided by such companies. In October, the FTC argued that the
Ninth Circuit’s broad ruling would create an ” enforcement gap ” in which no federal agency could oversee non-common carrier services provided by common carriers. For instance, when Verizon completes its acquisition of Yahoo, Yahoo services could be exempt from FTC regulation.
In its Tuesday filing, the court said, “the three-judge panel disposition in this case shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.”
President Trump’s FCC Chairman Ajit Pai praised the Ninth Circuit’s decision to revisit the ruling, suggesting it could help his efforts to roll back net neutrality rules .
The court’s decision, he said in a statement, “strengthens the case for the FCC to reverse its 2015 Title II Order and restore the FTC’s jurisdiction over broadband providers’ privacy and data security practices. Indeed, it moves us one step closer to having the consistent and comprehensive framework for digital privacy that the American people deserve.”

Sentiment rank: -0.3

© Source: http://www.zdnet.com/article/federal-court-to-revisit-ftcs-throttling-case-against-at-t/
All rights are reserved and belongs to a source media.

Whaling, or Business Email Compromise, has exploded in popularity shown by the massive sums that Whalers are raking in., Misc Software
Whaling, or Business Email Compromise, has exploded in popularity shown by the massive sums that Whalers are raking in. The US Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has reported the continuing explosion of Business Email Compromise (BEC) attacks as the practice becomes a US$ 5 billion business. Between October 2013 and 2016 the total international reported loss from such scams is US$ 5,302,890,449, with US bodies taking up nearly US$ 1.6 billion of that number. That number is drawn together from a variety of reported sources, including complaints to the FBI’s cyber-crime body, IC3. There may be many such incidents which are unreported leaving the true global cost of BEC as yet unknown. The scam continued to be a favourite of cyber-criminals from January 2015 to December 2016, a period that witnessed the skyrocketing of identified exposed losses by 2,370 percent. At its heart, BEC or Whaling is simple. Once an attacker chooses a target, they will spoof an email address or compromise a mail server and then impersonate an individual within the targeted company or at least intimately associated with it. Attackers take a great deal of time to research their targets before crafting an intricately considered email to trick their targets. Social media often provides a great bounty of seemingly innocuous data for a cyber-criminal to cobble together and exploit. “There are daft links that you would never even dream of”, Richard De Vere, a pentester and director of The AntiSocial Engineer, said in a comment. If you post a picture of your new car on social media, a Whaler might see your licence plate and then use it to figure out all manner of information, including where you got the car from. A short spoofed email later, they’re impersonating your dealership and saying you owe them $5,000. “Having access to someone’s social media just opens up so many little variables and tangents”, said De Vere, “it’s linking it up that’s the key” That email will often be sent to a senior executive or key member of the human resources or finance department and direct its recipient to initiate a wire transfer, direct payment to a particular account or to hand over business-critical information. Messages will often be sent at the end of a week or working day to catch their recipients off guard and typically adopt a hurried tone in an attempt to get their victims to abandon their sense of scepticism. The FBI notes that scams of this variety are becoming increasingly similar, paring down in diversity to just a few predominant forms. Conmen will often pretend to be a lawyer with access to confidential information, others will pretend to be a foreign supplier chasing an invoice for services rendered and some will even attempt to initiate hurried wire transfers into ‘company accounts’. In any case, successful attacks end with compromised data or stolen funds. Asian banks are still the primary destination of those stolen funds, according to the FBI, but the United Kingdom is also a popular recipient of the ill-gotten gains. The advisory notes that the continuing popularity of the scam does not appear to be the result of wild new developments in the area. The FBI noted that the classic form of the scam has benefited from a resurgence.

Sentiment rank: 0

© Source: https://www.pcauthority.com.au/News/461154,fbi-whaling-now-a-us-5-billion-business-as-execs-targeted.aspx?utm_source=feed&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=PC+%26+Tech+Authority+Software+feed
All rights are reserved and belongs to a source media.