Домой Блог Страница 76629

WH Pushes Back Health Questions Trump Will Have Physical Walter Reed

0

«The president’s throat was dry, nothing more than that.»
White House Press Secretary Sarah Sanders on Thursday said President Donald Trump’s “throat was dry” at the end of his Jerusalem speech on Wednesday, which resulted in many questioning the president’s health.
Sanders called these concerns “pretty ridiculous,” explaining that “the president’s throat was dry, nothing more than that.”
It was also revealed that, like his predecessors, Trump will undergo a full physical early next year and the results will be made public by the doctor.
“The full physical that most presidents go through, that will take place at Walter Reed, and those records will be released by the doctor following that taking place,” Sanders said.
During Trump’s major speech on Wednesday announcing that the U. S. would recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel, the president appeared to start slurring his words, leading many online to speculate what could be the causing the impairment. “The official term for slurred speech is dysarthria, when the muscles you use to speak weaken or you have a hard time completely controlling their use,” CNN noted in an article discussing the moment.
Multiple Twitter users wondered if Trump was slurring his speech:
Why is Trump slurring his speech?
— Mia Farrow (@MiaFarrow) December 6,2017
Was he slurring?
— Walter Shaub (@waltshaub) December 6,2017
During the 2016 presidential campaign, Trump’s personal physician, Dr. Harold Bornstein, released two statements on Trump’s health. One was a one-page summary deeming the president in “excellent physical health,” and one in 2015 he noted that Trump “would be the healthiest individual ever elected to the presidency.”
Watch Sander’s comments below, via MSNBC.

© Source: http://ijr.com/2017/12/1030770-wh-pushes-back-on-ridiculous-health-questions-following-trump-slurred-speech/
All rights are reserved and belongs to a source media.

Arrest of Former President of Argentina Ordered for Covering up Iran's Role in Attack Killing 85 Jews

0

«There is no way it can be described as something other than anti-Semitic.»
A federal judge in Argentina has indicted former leftist President Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner for treason, ordering her arrest for trying to cover up Iran’s possible role in a 1994 bombing killing 85 people, according to Reuters.
“In January 2015, the prosecutor who initially made the accusation, Alberto Nisman, was found shot dead in the bathroom of his Buenos Aires apartment,” Reuters reported. “Nisman said Fernandez worked behind the scenes to clear Iran and normalize relations to clinch a grains-for-oil deal with Tehran.”
The death was classified as a suicide, according to Reuters. “[A]n official investigating the case has said the shooting appeared to be a homicide. Nisman’s body was discovered hours before he was to brief Congress on the bombing of the center.”
The timing of the shooting casts doubt on the circumstances regarding his “suicide.”
Kirchner is currently a senator, so Argentina’s Congress would vote to strip her of parliamentary immunity before her arrest can occur. Judge Claudio Bonadio also ordered the house of arrest of Hector Timerman, who has been foreign minister under Kirchner.
Removing immunity for legislators is rare in Argentina. Congress voted on October 25 to remove immunity for Kirchner’s former planning minister, Julio de Vido, who was arrested that same day, according to Reuters.
The attack occurred on July 18,1994, at the Argentine Israelite Mutual Association’s headquarters. A suicide bomber drove a van full of explosives into the building in Buenos Aires, killing 85 people and wounding hundreds more, according to Haaretz.
The association, founded in 1894, is a non-political, Jewish communal organization with employees and possessed a library of rare Jewish books.
At the time of the 1994 attack, the association served a community of 250,000 Jews, the second largest Jewish population in the Americas, second only to the U. S. The headquarters contained 100 years of historical archives. Everything was destroyed in the bombing.
“There is no way it can be described as something other than anti-Semitic,” Haaretz said.
The bombing occurred just two years after 29 people were killed in a car bombing at the Israeli embassy in Buenos Aires.
Bonadio, in his ruling, wrote that evidence “in the case showed Iran, with the help of Argentine citizens, had appeared to achieve its goal of avoiding being declared a ‘terrorist’ state by Argentina,” according to Reuters.
The maximum sentence for treason in Argentina is punishable up to 10 to 25 years in prison.
Kirchner denies all claims of wrongdoing.

© Source: http://ijr.com/the-declaration/2017/12/1030699-arrest-former-president-argentina-ordered-covering-irans-role-attack-killing-85-jews/
All rights are reserved and belongs to a source media.

After Wavering, White House Says U. S. to Attend Winter Olympics

0

White House Press Secretary Sarah Sanders confirmed U. S. plans to go to the 2018 Winter Olympics shortly after raising questions about whether American athletes would participate in the games in South Korea, where North Korea’s nuclear ambitions have raised security concerns about the event.
White House Press Secretary Sarah Sanders confirmed U. S. plans to go to the 2018 Winter Olympics shortly after raising questions about whether American athletes would participate in the games in South Korea, where North Korea’s nuclear ambitions have raised security concerns about the event.
“UPDATE: The U. S. looks forward to participating in the Winter Olympics in South Korea,” Sanders said Thursday on Twitter. “The protection of Americans is our top priority and we are engaged with the South Koreans and other partner nations to secure the venues.”
The tweet came less than an hour after Sanders said at the White House daily press briefing that the U. S. government — and President Donald Trump — had yet to decide whether to participate, appearing to raise doubts about the safety of visitors to South Korea, a key ally.
“No official decision has been made on that,” Sanders told reporters. “We’ll keep you guys posted as those decisions are made.”
Sanders said the decision would be made through an inter-agency process, with Trump weighing in on whether the athletes should go to South Korea.
“The goal is to do so but that will be a decision made closer to the time,” she said.
Sanders comments come a day after U. S. Ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley said it was an “open question” whether the U. S. athletes would attend.
“In the talks that we have — whether it’s Jerusalem or North Korea — it’s always about, how do we protect the US citizens in the area?” Haley said Wednesday on Fox News. “And so those are conversations that are happening.”
The 2018 Winter Olympics are set to take place in February in PyeongChang, South Korea.
If the U. S. were to stay away from the Winter Olympics, it would be a major blow to Comcast Corp., which paid $4.4 billion in 2011 for the rights to broadcast the games on NBC through 2020.
Mark Jones, a spokesman for the U. S. Olympic Committee said the organization expects to participate.
“We have not had any discussions, either internally or with our government partners, about the possibility of not taking teams to the 2018 Olympic and Paralympic Winter Games,” Jones said. “We plan on supporting two full delegations in PyeongChang.”
— With assistance by Gerry Smith, and Eben Novy-Williams

© Source: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-12-07/after-wavering-white-house-says-u-s-to-attend-winter-olympics
All rights are reserved and belongs to a source media.

Trump takes credit for ISIS defeats. Does he deserve it?

0

Trump hasn’t reversed Obama’s counter-ISIS strategy, but he has accelerated ISIS setbacks.
WASHINGTON — President Trump said this week that the military has “knocked the hell” out of the Islamic State, adding that the battlefield success is based on his decision to give commanders more latitude in fighting the terror group.
“I want to thank Gen. Mattis for doing such a great job with respect to ISIS,” Trump said, turning to Defense Secretary Jim Mattis at Wednesday’s cabinet meeting. “He’s knocked the hell out of them. Of course, I’ve made it possible with what I’ve let you do.”
It’s true that the Islamic State has lost its grip on nearly all the terrain it controlled when it first came on the scene three years ago in Iraq and Syria, but pinpointing credit for that success is more complicated.
What Trump left unsaid was that his administration is pursuing a strategy against the Islamic State, which is also called ISIS, largely formulated under Obama.
“Nothing President Trump did or authorized was a fundamental game changer in the counter-ISIS strategy,” said Jennifer Cafarella, an analyst at the Institute for the Study of War.
The Obama strategy was designed to support local ground forces in Iraq and Syria with coalition air power, advisers and training. American ground forces are not engaged in direct combat with the terror group.
The United States has deployed about 5,200 troops to Iraq and 2,000 in Syria. Most are serving in advisory or training roles.
The overall strategy hasn’t changed, but Trump’s decision to give field commanders more decision-making authority has accelerated the pace of the campaign, analysts said.
In the past year, ISIS has been driven from Raqqa, its de facto capital in Syria, and Mosul, Iraq’s second-largest city.
The Islamic State has lost most major towns and cities it once controlled and the remnants are clinging to a string of towns and villages on the Euphrates River stretching between Iraq and Syria.
There are about 3,000 militants left in Iraq and Syria, down from a peak of more than 25,000 in 2014 and 2015.
Trump “delegated authority to the right level to aggressively and in a timely manner move against enemy vulnerabilities,” Mattis said earlier this year, in explaining the president’s changes.
Analysts say the new authorities have allowed commanders to move more quickly to seize the initiative on battles. The Pentagon said it still vets requests for airstrikes carefully, but commanders closer to the battle can now approve those strikes.
Critics had said Obama was too restrictive, requiring White House clearance for even small troop increases or changes in where advisers were on the battlefield.
“Target approval was at too high a level and too slow,” said Michael Barbero, a retired Army lieutenant general who served three tours in Iraq. “That has changed.”
Still, it is nearly impossible to predict how the war with ISIS would have developed without Trump’s changes.
Even before Trump took office, U. S. officers had started making some changes.
Lt. Gen. Stephen Townsend, who recently completed a tour as the top coalition commander based in Baghdad, issued a directive in December that moved advisers closer to the combat units they were supporting to capitalize on progress Iraqi forces were having in Mosul.
“By putting the advisers further forward with the Iraqis it allowed a lot more agility and a lot more clarity to the decision making,” Col. Pat Work, a U. S. adviser in Iraq, said in an interview after returning to the United States earlier this year.
Airstrikes in Iraq and Syria increased dramatically, but it’s not clear whether that is a result of new authorities or progress ground forces would have ahd regardless. The number of bombs and other weapons dropped in both countries increased 65% to 36,351 in the first nine months of this year over the same period in 2016, according to U. S. military statistics.
Since then, bombing has tapered off as the number of targets in Iraq and Syria have declined. The Pentagon is also considering reducing the number of trainers and advisers in the region.
The chaos of war often makes it hard to identify any single factor for success or failure.
“There was a lot more to this than bombs and there was a lot more to this then any single decision,” Work said.

© Source: http://rssfeeds.usatoday.com/~/507021190/0/usatodaycomworld-topstories~Trump-takes-credit-for-ISIS-defeats-Does-he-deserve-it/
All rights are reserved and belongs to a source media.

Pantone's Color of the Year for 2018 is a Princely purple – Los Angeles Times

0

The choice is not too surprising, given that Pantone and the late pop star’s estate designated “Love Symbol #2” as his official color in August.
In a move that would have delighted Prince, the Pantone Color Institute has named Ultra Violet as Color of the Year for 2018.
In other words, Pantone’s Color of the Year for 2018 is purple.
The choice is not too surprising, given that Pantone and the late pop star’s estate designated “Love Symbol #2” as his official color in August. The distinctive purple, inspired by Prince’s custom Yamaha purple piano, was designed to be a part of Prince’s tour before he died in April 2016.
In a press release issued Thursday morning, Pantone described the hue as a “dramatically provocative and thoughtful purple shade,” that “communicates originality, ingenuity, and visionary thinking that points us toward the future.”
Laurie Pressman, vice president of the Pantone Color Institute, described the color — a lot like Sherwin-Williams’ Izmir Purple SW 6825 — as “a blue-based purple that takes our awareness and potential to a higher level.”
One of the hottest color trends this year was millennial pink. Will homeowners and designers go for purple sofas, chairs and accessories?
Michael Murphy, trends and interior design producer at Lamps Plus, thinks so.
“There is a sense of optimism and confidence in this color,” Murphy said. “Having its root in two colors (red and blue), it is a color of inclusion.”
Murphy also said it will pair well with Pantone colors Lemon Zest, Monaco Blue, Hemlock and Poppy Red.
Interior designer Mark Cutler was not surprised by the color choice. “From the home décor perspective, we have been waiting for the arrival of this color,” Cutler said. “It gives an immediate sense of luxury, strength and grounding. Also, it is surprisingly versatile, in fact it’s almost a neutral. Pair it with whites for a graphic look, greys for a cool moody look or reds and yellows for a rich jewel tone explosion. Traditionally the color of royalty, it’s time we all had our turn isn’t it?”
Please consider subscribing today to support stories like this one. Get full access to our signature journalism for just 99 cents for the first four weeks. Already a subscriber? Your support makes our work possible. Thank you.
lisa.boone@latimes.com
Twitter: @lisaboone19
For an easy way to follow the L.A. scene, bookmark L.A. at Home and join us on our Facebook page for home and garden design, Instagram, Twitter and Pinterest .
ALSO:
The Pantone trendsetters have spoken: Green is the color of 2017
How, exactly, does a ‘Color of the Year’ get chosen?
Holiday Gift Guide 2017
Southern California home tours

© Source: http://www.latimes.com/home/la-hm-pantone-2018-htmlstory.html
All rights are reserved and belongs to a source media.

Pantone's Color of the Year for 2018 is a Princely purple

0

The choice is not too surprising, given that Pantone and the late pop star’s estate designated “Love Symbol #2” as his official color in August.
In a move that would have delighted Prince, the Pantone Color Institute has named Ultra Violet as Color of the Year for 2018.
In other words, Pantone’s Color of the Year for 2018 is purple.
The choice is not too surprising, given that Pantone and the late pop star’s estate designated “Love Symbol #2” as his official color in August. The distinctive purple, inspired by Prince’s custom Yamaha purple piano, was designed to be a part of Prince’s tour before he died in April 2016.
In a press release issued Thursday morning, Pantone described the hue as a “dramatically provocative and thoughtful purple shade,” that “communicates originality, ingenuity, and visionary thinking that points us toward the future.”
Laurie Pressman, vice president of the Pantone Color Institute, described the color — a lot like Sherwin-Williams’ Izmir Purple SW 6825 — as “a blue-based purple that takes our awareness and potential to a higher level.”
One of the hottest color trends this year was millennial pink. Will homeowners and designers go for purple sofas, chairs and accessories?
Michael Murphy, trends and interior design producer at Lamps Plus, thinks so.
“There is a sense of optimism and confidence in this color,” Murphy said. “Having its root in two colors (red and blue), it is a color of inclusion.”
Murphy also said it will pair well with Pantone colors Lemon Zest, Monaco Blue, Hemlock and Poppy Red.
Interior designer Mark Cutler was not surprised by the color choice. “From the home décor perspective, we have been waiting for the arrival of this color,” Cutler said. “It gives an immediate sense of luxury, strength and grounding. Also, it is surprisingly versatile, in fact it’s almost a neutral. Pair it with whites for a graphic look, greys for a cool moody look or reds and yellows for a rich jewel tone explosion. Traditionally the color of royalty, it’s time we all had our turn isn’t it?”
Please consider subscribing today to support stories like this one. Get full access to our signature journalism for just 99 cents for the first four weeks. Already a subscriber? Your support makes our work possible. Thank you.

© Source: http://www.latimes.com/home/la-hm-pantone-2018-htmlstory.html
All rights are reserved and belongs to a source media.

White House walks back remarks that US athletes might not participate in 2018 Olympics

0

White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders quickly wal
“The protection of Americans is our top priority and we are engaged with the South Koreans and other partner nations to secure the venues,” Sanders wrote on Twitter.
The 2018 Olympics start Feb. 9, and will take place in Pyeongchang, roughly 50 miles from the demilitarized zone with North Korea.
U. S. Ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley said Wednesday that it’s still an “open question” as to whether the U. S. will send its athletes to the Winter Olympics, citing escalating tensions with North Korea.
“I think those are conversations we’re going to have to have. But what have we always said? We don’t ever fear anything. We live our lives,” Haley said on Fox News.
White House national security adviser H. R. McMaster, meanwhile, earlier this week told Fox News that Americans should feel safe attending the games.
Haley said U. S. officials will monitor activity in the region closely and determine a way to ensure athletes are protected.
“What we will do is we’ll make sure that we’re taking every precaution possible to make sure that they’re safe, and to know everything that’s going on around them,” she said.
The U. S. mission to the United Nations later added to her comments with a similar statement as Sanders’s.
“The United States looks forward to participating in the Winter Olympics in South Korea next year. As always, the protection of American citizens overseas is our most important priority,” it said in a statement to The Washington Post. “We remain closely engaged with the South Koreans and other partner nations to secure the venues as we do every Olympics.”
Olympic and NBC officials on Thursday also responded to Haley’s comments.
U. S. Olympic Committee spokesman Mark Jones said it had “not had any discussions, either internally or with our government partners, about the possibility of not taking teams to the 2018 Olympic and Paralympic Winter Games.”
And a spokesperson for NBC, which will broadcast the Olympics, said the network is “in close contact with numerous security agencies, including the U. S. State Department, which continues to advise us that it is safe for Americans to travel to South Korea.”
Questions about Olympians’ safety in South Korea have swirled in recent weeks, as North Korea continues to expand its nuclear weapons program.
Late last month, North Korea launched a new intercontinental ballistic missile, ending a two-month hiatus for missile tests from the isolated country.

© Source: http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/363805-white-house-leaves-open-possibility-us-athletes-wont-participate-in
All rights are reserved and belongs to a source media.

„Jarosław Kaczyński ani nie pragnie być premierem, ani nie ma takich ambicji”

0

– Jarosław Kaczyński na pozycji stratega, z lotu ptaka obserwującego, co się dzieje w rządzie, jest bardziej przydatny dla Polski, niż gdyby był uwikłany w codzienne decyzje – powiedział w „Gościu Wiadomości” Marek Król z „Sieci”. – Sytuacja, gdyby premierem był Jarosław Kaczyński, byłaby z funkcjonalnego punktu widzenia bardziej transparentna – ocenił Roman Mańka z fundacji FIBRE.
– Jarosław Kaczyński na pozycji stratega, z lotu ptaka obserwującego, co się dzieje w rządzie, jest bardziej przydatny dla Polski, niż gdyby był uwikłany w codzienne decyzje – powiedział w „Gościu Wiadomości” Marek Król z „Sieci”. – Sytuacja, gdyby premierem był Jarosław Kaczyński, byłaby z funkcjonalnego punktu widzenia bardziej transparentna – ocenił Roman Mańka z fundacji FIBRE.

© Source: http://www.tvp.info/35123962/jaroslaw-kaczynski-ani-nie-pragnie-byc-premierem-ani-nie-ma-takich-ambicji
All rights are reserved and belongs to a source media.

Sarah Sanders No Discrepancy FBI Director Trump Tweets

0

«We don’t think that there is a discrepancy…»
During her press briefing Thursday, White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders refuted a reporter’s suggestion that FBI Director Christopher Wray highlighted a discrepancy in his view of his agency’s reputation and President Donald Trump’s view.
“We don’t think that there is a discrepancy,” Sanders said, before indicating the White House agreed others respected FBI employees, while the agency’s political leaders had a different reputation.
The discussion emerged from comments in Wray’s Thursday testimony, in which he appeared to push back on a tweet Trump issued Monday:
After years of Comey, with the phony and dishonest Clinton investigation (and more), running the FBI, its reputation is in Tatters — worst in History! But fear not, we will bring it back to greatness.
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 3,2017
Wray told the House Judiciary Committee that in his experience, the FBI’s reputation was “quite good.”
Sanders was likely referring to other comments Wray made about the FBI’s employees. “The FBI I see is tens of thousands of brave men and women that are working hard… The FBI that I see is people, decent people, committed to the highest principles of dignity and professionalism and respect,” he also said, according to The Los Angeles Times.
When asked whether Trump’s tweet could cause people to distrust law enforcement, Sanders said she didn’t think so. “No, and again, the president is referring to the political leaders at the FBI, particularly those that were involved in the Hillary Clinton probe,” she said.
Watch her comments below, via CNN.

© Source: http://ijr.com/2017/12/1030719-sarah-sanders-trumps-tweet-referred-to-political-leaders-not-other-employees-at-the-fbi/
All rights are reserved and belongs to a source media.

This 1925 Novel Inspired Japan’s Attack on Pearl Harbor

0

A little known novel by a British naval analyst predicted a U. S.-Japan war, including a Japanese sneak attack on U. S. forces.
The novel predicted a Japanese surprise attack on U. S. naval forces in the Pacific, the Allies’ island hopping strategy used during the actual Pacific War, and the eventual U. S. victory over Japan. Bywater’s work of fiction is thought to have influenced Imperial Japan’s chief naval strategist and commander of the Imperial Navy’s Combined Fleet, Marshal Admiral Isoruko Yamamoto, when he was planning his naval campaign against the United States.
The war ends after six years of heavy fighting, during which the Americans slowly encroached on Japan by employing a leapfrogging strategy. In the book, U. S. naval forces defeated the Imperial Japanese Navy in a climactic battle off the island of Yap in the Western Pacific. In the battle, the Japanese lose five battleships while the U. S. Navy loses only two. Japan finally capitulates following a U. S. air raid on Tokyo where U. S. aircraft drop bombs filled with leaflets urging the Japanese population to surrender rather than risk destruction of their homeland.
The book was translated into Japanese and for a time became required reading for Japanese Navy officers (in the United States, war planners purportedly rewrote War Plan Orange to more closely resemble the operational plan described in the novel.)  According to Honan, Yamamoto read Bywater’s novel “so assiduously in both overall strategy and specific tactics at Pearl Harbor, Guam, the Philippines, and even the Battle of Midway that it is no exaggeration to call Hector Bywater the man who invented the Pacific War.” This almost certainly overstates the novel’s influence.
For one thing, many other analysts and naval planners were anticipating a future military confrontation between the two countries in the Pacific. For example, the German writer Karl Haushofer in a 1922 study discussed similar possibilities and also pre-shadowed the Allies’ island hopping campaign. Furthermore, Japanese planners scarcely needed Bywater’s novel to recognize the military benefits of a surprise attack. After all, surprise attacks had worked for the Japanese in the first Sino-Japanese War in 1894 and in February 1904 when the Imperial Japanese Navy destroyed the Russian Far East Fleet anchored in Port Arthur. Indeed, Yamamoto lost two fingers during the battle of Tsushima in 1905, a major naval engagement of the Russia-Japanese War.
Nonetheless, although the book likely did not cause Yamamoto to plan a surprise attack on U. S. forces, a strong argument can be made that the novel reinforced Yamamoto’s already held conviction — largely the result of quick victories during the First Sino-Japanese War and Russia-Japanese War — that a decisive battle between surface fleets might still produce a favorable strategic outcome for Japan even against a superior enemy like the United States. As I wrote in the September 2017 issue of The Diplomat Magazine:
Bywater also focused on decisive battles fought between capital ships as the ultimate deciding factor in his fictional war. Interestingly, the Philippine Sea is precisely where Bywater’s first naval battle between Japanese and U. S. forces also takes place in the novel.
The fact that Yamamoto’s war plan shared a lot in common with Bywater’s strategic thinking and his general outline of a future Japanese-U. S. conflict could therefore be interpreted as a curious case of cross-cultural group thinking. It could also merely illustrate that there are always a finite number of possible strategies and counter-strategies in war restricted by the prevailing military thought of the time.
What ultimately convinced Yamamoto to use aircraft carriers and airplanes armed with torpedoes to strike the U. S. fleet anchored in Pearl Harbor was the Battle of Taranto in November 1940,  during which obsolete British Fairely Swordfish biplane torpedo bombers, launched from an aircraft carrier, managed to sink one Italian battleship and heavily damage two more. Consequently, rather than art imitating life, as the axiom goes, life seems to have imitated life on the morning of December 7,1941 at Pearl Harbor.

© Source: https://thediplomat.com/2017/12/this-1925-novel-inspired-japans-attack-on-pearl-harbor/
All rights are reserved and belongs to a source media.

Timeline words data