Language Learning Showdown: Rosetta Stone vs. Duolingo
There are so many language learning resources available now it can feel a bit overwhelming. Rosetta Stone and Duolingo are two of the most popular choices, but they each have their own perks and quirks. Let’s translate their key features so you can pick the right tool for your language studies.
This language learning showdown is truly a battle of two generations and two ideals. In one corner we have a company that has been around since the early 90s, selling effective language learning software to people for 25 years. In the other corner is the new kid on the block, championing the belief that learning language should be freely available to everyone. Let’s take a closer look at our contenders before we ring the bell:
Both options can also be used in-browser, depending on what services you choose to use. And while Rosetta Stone’s steep price tag may immediately turn you off, it doesn’t make Duolingo an automatic winner by any means. It won’t be ideal for everybody, but there are still plenty of reasons to shell out the cash.
Both platforms have more than 20 languages for you to learn, but there’s a few key differences in their offerings. Let’s break it down.
Rosetta Stone’s 28 languages include :
Duolingo’s 21 languages include :
As you can see, Duolingo has a nice set of popular languages. But do you notice anything when you compare the two? Duolingo has almost no Asian languages, save for Vietnamese. In fact, it has very few languages that use non-English, non-Latin alphabets. That means if you want to learn Arabic, Chinese, Dari, Tagalog, Hindi, Indonesian, Japanese, Korean, Pashto, Turkish, or Urdu, you’ll have to go with Rosetta Stone or another program. Granted, it’s hard to complain about it too much when Duolingo isn’t charging you a cent.
As mentioned, Duolingo’s biggest boon is the fact that it’s 100% free to use. All you have to do is make a Duolingo account and you can access just about everything it has to offer on your computer, iOS, or Android device. There are some paid offerings on Duolingo, but they’re mostly cosmetic items, or things like a “Streak Repair” when you break a lesson streak.
Rosetta Stone, on the other hand, offers two pay-to-learn options:
If you want to access lessons on the go, the subscription plan is your only option. It’s also cheaper if you think you can make your way through an entire program in a certain amount of time. If you’ll be learning casually, and don’t mind doing all of your lessons on your computer, the download/CD option is best.
No matter what, Rosetta Stone is going to be pretty expensive compared to Duolingo. But it’s not hard to find deals on Rosetta Stone that reduce the pricing quite a bit. For example, I just purchased a 12 month subscription to all levels of Japanese for only $114 instead of $179. And Rosetta Stone offers payment plans if you don’t want to pay it all up front, as well as a 30-day money back guarantee if you don’t like it. Still, Duolingo is free… Free!
The real question on your mind is probably “Which one of these works better?” Well, like most forms of education, it depends on how much effort you put in. They’re both very effective tools for learning language. But if you want something more concrete, a study in 2012 found that people actually learned faster with Duolingo. The study suggests it takes 34 hours of Duolingo lessons to learn the equivalent of one college semester, but 55 hours of study with Rosetta Stone. However, the study included only one language, Spanish, and both tools dramatically increased the Spanish speaking ability of participants.
Before you stop reading and choose Duolingo because it’s free and won in a single comparative study, it’s important to consider how they teach. Both share some similarities, but they teach differently, and one style may be more conducive to your learning preferences.
Duolingo’s gamified lessons focus on direct translation of words and phrases, and your studies remain primarily in the bilingual field—meaning you’re almost always translating from one language to your native language, or vice versa. This makes learning quicker and simpler, but less immersive. Rosetta Stone stops holding your hand almost immediately, forcing you to piece together and describe what’s happening in various photos. It can be frustrating at times, but it’s the closest thing to a real life scenario and it forces you to start thinking with the language you’re learning. And using the target language in the thought process is one of the major cornerstones of learning it.
Rosetta Stone is also a bit more feature rich than Duolingo. For example, it has an adjustable speech recognition engine you can tweak to increase or decrease the difficulty of pronunciation tests. As you progress through your lessons, you can make the speech recognition judge harder. Rosetta Stone is also particularly useful when you’re learning a language with a different alphabet because it will abandon the English alphabet right from the start. Not only are you deciphering what’s in a photo, when you see the words, you see them the way you need to know them. You learn to decipher, pronounce, and identify words and characters.
If you’re not sure which approach you’d like more, you can try both. Duolingo is free to use, and Rosetta Stone offers a free trial to give you a taste for the way it teaches. Give them both a go and see if one grabs you more.
Truth is, both of these tools are great for different reasons. In my opinion, it all depends on why you’re interested in learning a language.
If you’ve never tried learning a new language before, go directly to Duolingo, do not pass Rosetta Stone, do not pay $250. It is a fantastic introduction to the languages it offers and it gives you a lot to work with for no charge. It’s also a ton of fun. They’re always updating with new features , lesson types, and ways to keep you motivated. And Duolingo is super easy to use anywhere on your smartphone or tablet. It’s perfect for the on-the-go traveler that wants to get a basic grasp on a language. You’ll learn enough to get around and have simple conversations. Just try it. You have nothing to lose.
If you are super serious about becoming fluent in a language, or the language you want to learn isn’t available on Duolingo, Rosetta Stone is a solid choice. It’s immersive teaching method forces you to learn the language from the ground up instead of merely becoming a soundboard of common words and phrases. People shun it because of the price tag, but it’s effective—I’ve used it for French and now Japanese—and things like timed subscriptions and payment plans make it more affordable than the sticker price implies. It’s ideal for dedicated students who aim to know a language inside and out. And there’s something to be said about paying for your lessons. When there’s money on the line—or a time limit—you’ll be more motivated to actually go through with your lessons. Make no mistake, Rosetta Stone won’t make you fluent, but I think it provides the conceptual building blocks you’ll need on the long road to fluency.
© Source: http://feeds.gawker.com/~r/lifehacker/full/~3/HAAiPwEj_T0/language-learning-showdown-rosetta-stone-vs-duolingo-1790938306
All rights are reserved and belongs to a source media.
Nokia could be about to introduce a smart, AI-powered assistant app of its own called Viki, if a trademark application just unearthed by Dutch blog GSMinfo is anything to go by. 
Samsung’s 4D VR rides tilt you every which way — including upside down — as they simulate space racing and other demos. 
In a corner of LG’s sprawling, dripping-with-technology booth at the Las Vegas Convention Center sat a circular table populated by a group of small, futuristic snowmen. Each of them sported a black touchscreen display showing a pair of electronic eyes that would intermittently squint as if they were smiling at you. 
William A. Jacobson 
BEIJING—An official with President-elect Donald Trump’s transition team said Saturday that neither Mr. Trump nor transition officials would be meeting with Taiwanese President Tsai Ing-wen, who stopped in Houston during her trip to Central America. 
Taiwanese President Tsai Ing-wen did not meet US president-elect Donald Trump or members of his team during her stopover in the United States on the weekend, avoiding a move that would have riled a jittery Beijing. A spokeswoman for Trump’s transition team, Jessica Ditto, said in an email on Saturday there would be no meetings between Tsai and officials representing the president-elect in the US, the Associated Press reported. Tsai arrived in Houston on Saturday on her way to Honduras, Nicaragua, Guatemala and El Salvador. She will stop off in San Francisco after her visit to Central American allies before flying back to Taiwan. Analysts said any meeting between Tsai and Trump officials would have seriously angered Beijing, which is concerned Trump may abandon decades of US policy towards Taiwan when he takes office. Trump has questioned why the US should continue to abide by the one-China principle under which it does not recognise Taiwan as a sovereign state. Beijing was also angered by a telephone call between Tsai and Trump in December when she congratulated the president-elect on his win in the polls. Taiwan and the mainland have been governed separately since Kuomintang forces fled to the island in 1949 after losing the civil war to communist forces. Beijing considers Taiwan a breakaway Chinese province. Tsai kept a low profile after her arrival in Houston, with analysts suggesting this was the best strategy with the risk of the stopover increasing the ire of Beijing. Taiwanese media reported she avoided interviews in Houston and barred all people attending a dinner hosted by ethnic Taiwanese in the southern US city from bringing cameras or smartphones to try to reduce publicity. The only remarks she made to journalists waiting in freezing weather outside her hotel were, “It is too cold! Get in. Don’t stand outside,” Taipei-based Central News Agency reported. But she did meet several US dignitaries, according to Taiwanese media. Texas Republican Congressman Blake Farenthold and the chairman of the American Institute in Taiwan, James Moriarty, met her at the airport, along with Taiwan’s envoy to Washington, Stanley Kao. They accompanied her to a cancer centre and a museum displaying treasures loaned by Taiwan’s National Palace Museum. Taiwanese media also reported that Tsai met Houston’s mayor, Sylvester Turner, and Randall Schriver, a former deputy assistant secretary of state for East Asian and Pacific affairs at the State Department. They remained tight-lipped over what they had said. Chen Ming-wen, a legislator with the governing Democratic Progressive Party in Taiwan who is accompanying Tsai on her trip, said Tsai was also expected to receive phone calls from other US political dignitaries and senators. Taiwan’s Presidential Office has declined to reveal the full itineraries for Tsai’s US stopovers in what observers see as a bid to play down the matter. William Stanton, a former director of the American Institute in Taiwan, the US representative office on the island, said Tsai was wise to maintain a low profile during her US stay. “No one wants bigger trouble now,” he said, referring to the phone conversation between Tsai and Trump that angered the mainland. Shi Yinhong, an adviser to Beijing’s State Council and director of the Centre for American Studies at Renmin University in Beijing, said Tsai was handling sensitivities over ties with the US intelligently. “Tsai Ing-wen has remained low key since that phone call with Trump. She has even ordered a ban on all members of the DPP from talking about Trump and cross-straits relations. She is smarter than you think,” he said. “She has tried her best to avoid giving [the mainland] any excuses to severely punish Taiwan.” Additional reporting by Catherine Wong
The dusty desert city of Khuzdar in southwestern Pakistan has no hospital and no commercial flights into its tiny airport, but government officials who visited recently spoke in glowing terms of its future as a hub of commerce. Pakistan’s new army chief, General Qamar Javed Bajwa, was among a flock of dignitaries who descended upon Khuzdar, a city of 400,000, to tout the benefits of the China Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) for the southwestern province of Baluchistan. How much the US$57 billion network of energy projects, roads and a deep-water port linking western China with Pakistan’s southwestern coast will benefit ordinary Pakistanis has been debated in recent months, with critics saying Chinese banks and companies will gain most. Pakistani officials, however, assured students, officials and citizens at a seminar in Khuzdar that CPEC would bring new prosperity to Pakistan’s largest, least-populous and poverty-plagued province. “Baluchistan unfortunately had been neglected in the past, for a host of reasons, but not anymore,” Bajwa told the gathering at Khuzdar’s Baluchistan University of Engineering and Technology. The head of the army is one of the most powerful positions in Pakistan, where the military not only controls security but also operates a vast business empire and often dictates key areas of foreign policy. Students in the audience were sceptical about whether CPEC would benefit the province. Baluchistan, which has rich reserves of natural gas, copper and gold, has long complained that the national government takes far more from the province than it gives back. Ire over this has contributed to a long-running ethnic separatist rebellion. A study late last year by the Applied Economics Research Centre (AERC) estimated CPEC would create 700,000 jobs in Pakistan and a Chinese newspaper recently placed the number at more than 2 million. But in Khuzdar, questions about how many jobs would come to Baluchistan from CPEC went unanswered. “I want to know what share Baluchistan will get and what the other provinces will get and on what basis?” a female student asked during a question and answer session. Concerns over how much Baluchistan will benefit were even voiced by a national official, Minister for Ports and Shipping Hasil Khan Bizenjo. “We just want to make sure that under CPEC the same thing does not happen to us as 1952, when gas was found in Baluchistan and yet in 2017 there is no gas in Khuzdar,” said Bizenjo, originally from Baluchistan and a speaker at the conference. Other speakers, however, envisioned Khuzdar as a centre of trade and industry. Baluchistan Chief Minister Sanaullah Zehri said that Khuzdar would be one of 29 Special Economic Zones under CPEC that would “greatly benefit the people of the city”. Khuzdar does not connect the provincial capital, Quetta, to the port city of Gwadar, but state representatives at the conference highlighted its significance as the second-largest city in the province and a potential transit point between Quetta and Karachi, Pakistan’s biggest city and economic hub. “We believe that Khuzdar has the ability to attract a great deal of local and foreign investment,” said Anwar Ul-Haq Kakar, a spokesman for the Baluchistan government. The Khuzdar university’s vice chancellor, Mohammad Amin, said he hoped CPEC could bring investment and jobs, because the city’s location four hours’ drive from Quetta had made it difficult to attract even faculty at the school. “No one is coming because there is no infrastructure here as yet,” Amin said of the university. “We will offer any PhD who accepts a job here a brand new Toyota Corolla and a 100 per cent pay increase.”
Volkswagen will call back 49,480 vehicles in China starting Feb. 6 due to brake design defects, the country’s quality watchdog announced on Tuesday. 
Chinese smartphone maker Huawei has announced that its latest device – the Huawei Honor 6X smartphone – will soon be available in India this coming Jan. 2 4. The device went official October last year on some selected regions in China, United States, and Europe. 
